Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses

2011-06-21 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Jun 15, 2011, at 12:47 PM, James Grace wrote: > Are there any horrific consequences to picking up this practice? --- Roland Dobbins //

Re: Cogent depeers ESnet

2011-06-21 Thread Cameron Byrne
On Jun 20, 2011 9:47 AM, "Christopher Pilkington" wrote: > > On Jun 20, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Jon Lewis wrote: > > > internet connectivity, and that much $ is at stake, you're stupid if you don't have some redundancy. Nothing works all the time forever. > > I can't consider Cogent even a redundant

coresite in reston?

2011-06-21 Thread Christopher Morrow
apparently had a bad day? fbi raid? (happy to lend a hand if folk who aren't local need assistance getting things put back together... wkumari used to run a list at: newhere.co

Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

2011-06-21 Thread brunner
> I was talking about public perception and the ability to change it > through marketing; not any actual security. > > It's like the difference between ".com" and ".biz", "people" don't > understand when something isn't a ".com" and don't trust it. When I > say "people" I'm talking about the avera

Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

2011-06-21 Thread Jorge Amodio
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Ray Soucy wrote: > I was talking about public perception and the ability to change it > through marketing; not any actual security. > > It's like the difference between ".com" and ".biz", "people" don't > understand when something isn't a ".com" and don't trust it.

RE: VMware ESX LACP Support

2011-06-21 Thread Thomas Magill
I have to agree with this. Port-channels add no value with the way ESX load-balances. In fact, we had a few issues arise because of them and converted everything to native ESX LB. -Original Message- From: Jimmy Hess [mailto:mysi...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 3:01 PM To: Ma

Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

2011-06-21 Thread Kyle Creyts
Or .inc? On Jun 21, 2011 10:57 AM, wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:39:00 MDT, Joel Maslak said: >> I wonder what sort of money .wpad would be worth... > > I was thinking .gbmh myself... >

Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

2011-06-21 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:39:00 MDT, Joel Maslak said: > I wonder what sort of money .wpad would be worth... I was thinking .gbmh myself... pgpRDYInukJWY.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

2011-06-21 Thread Ray Soucy
I was talking about public perception and the ability to change it through marketing; not any actual security. It's like the difference between ".com" and ".biz", "people" don't understand when something isn't a ".com" and don't trust it. When I say "people" I'm talking about the average non-tech

Re: Address Assignment Question

2011-06-21 Thread Steve Richardson
Meant to send this to the list. On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, John Levine wrote: >>They have inquired about IPv6 already, but it's only gone so far as >>that.  I would gladly give them a /64 and be done with it, but my >>concern is that they are going to want several /64 subnets for the >>same

Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

2011-06-21 Thread Tony Finch
On 21 Jun 2011, at 00:29, Mark Andrews wrote: > > I will repeat my assertion. There is no such thing as glue records > for the nameservers at the top of the zone within the zone itself > be they in-baliwick or not. Glue records live in the parent zone > and are there to avoid the catch 22 situa