On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Andrew Elliott wrote:
> How much are SP's charging and what are the thresholds? What are default
> allocations based on? (ie: size of the circuit, type of product, etc...)
For IPv4, there are policies provided by ARIN for this; they come
from RFC 2050.
To be i
should i be surprised that this hasn't been discussed much? anyone care to
elaborate and/or expand on the real telecom damage done in japan?
re: http://on.cnn.com/h8wiYg
.rL
I have been a happy Google Business Apps user for a good year now. I cannot
think of a single outage myself, although I have had an employee complain a
time or two. As I work quite a bit more, and use the services quite a bit
more, and have noticed nothing I am chalking there "issue" up to user e
The pop server had some problems today for my account. Cleared about an
hour later. The web version of the email worked fine.
Roy
On 3/15/2011 5:43 PM, Joe Renwick wrote:
I have a personal gmail account and several Google Apps accounts for email
and other services for my business. Been u
I have a personal gmail account and several Google Apps accounts for email
and other services for my business. Been using them constantly without
issue. Please follow up if you find an issue on their end...
Joe
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Atticus wrote:
> Odd. I haven't had any problems
On 3/15/2011 2:07 PM, Michael Loftis wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Anyone seeing gmail issues ? I checked at
http://www.google.com/appsstatus#hl=en
I've been having massively delayed incoming mail since about Sunday
(2011/03/13) some email taking days to come in,
Odd. I haven't had any problems at all.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> Anyone seeing gmail issues ? I checked at
> http://www.google.com/appsstatus#hl=en
I've been having massively delayed incoming mail since about Sunday
(2011/03/13) some email taking days to come in, some still hasn't
(Amazon Order status upda
Yes, I have issues with IMAP at the moment.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:m...@sentex.net]
Sent: 15 March 2011 21:13
To: NANOG list
Subject: gmail issues ?
Anyone seeing gmail issues ? I checked at
http://www.google.com/appsstatus#hl=en
and it says all ok. Yet I either ge
On Mar 15, 2011, at 4:09 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:47:22 CDT, Andy Ringsmuth said:
>> Any chance there's someone on here from Microsoft that could reply to me
>> off-list?
>
> Always helps to say what *part* of Microsoft - the OS guys, the sales guys,
> the
> i
Anyone seeing gmail issues ? I checked at
http://www.google.com/appsstatus#hl=en
and it says all ok. Yet I either get an RST, or it just times out, or
the 3 way handshake completes, and then just FINs my connection. I tried
a number of different source IPs inside my network as well as some
outside
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:47:22 CDT, Andy Ringsmuth said:
> Any chance there's someone on here from Microsoft that could reply to me
> off-list?
Always helps to say what *part* of Microsoft - the OS guys, the sales guys, the
infrastructure guys, the WindowsUpdate , the HotMail guys, the
pgpJSw
Any chance there's someone on here from Microsoft that could reply to me
off-list?
Thanks in advance.
---
Andy Ringsmuth
andyr...@inebraska.com
On Mar 15, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Andrew Elliott wrote:
>> "Larger than default"? There are rules about allocating IP space, it has to
>> do
>> with justification, not default sizes.
>
> Right, by "default" I was referring to a default minimum size block assigned
> to
> a particular product (I w
On Mar 15, 2011, at 6:27 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Andrew Elliott wrote:
>
>> Looking for information on the current standard practices for charging
>> customers
>> for larger than default v4 assignments.
>>
>> Especially with the rapidly depleting v4 space,
In a message written on Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:13:51AM -0400, Patrick W.
Gilmore wrote:
> As for your first sentence, it is true, I Am Not An Isp. :)
> However, I do get space from providers, and it is not at all normal
> for the provider to ask us for money. But then, maybe we are
> special.
I
I sent this as an official announcement to several RIPE mailing lists, and I am
sending it to you because I think you would appreciate this information too.
The RIPE NCC announced today the launch of "DNS vulnerabilities", the second
module of our DNSSEC E-Learning course.
This module explains
Does anyone know which CDN(s) will be used for this year's March
Madness On Demand?
On Mar 15, 2011, at 10:02 AM, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> On Mar 15, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Andrew Elliott wrote:
>>
>>> Looking for information on the current standard practices for charging
>>> customers
>>> for larger than default v4 assignments.
>>>
>>> Es
NANOG Folks -
Apologies for the cross post from ARIN-Announce, but I believe there is a
potential for indirect operational impact for networks otherwise unaware.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
To: ARIN-Announce
Posted: Wed, 9 March 2011
On 19 March, ARIN will deploy the
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Mar 15, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Andrew Elliott wrote:
Looking for information on the current standard practices for charging customers
for larger than default v4 assignments.
Especially with the rapidly depleting v4 space, how are SP's handling thes
> "Larger than default"? There are rules about allocating IP space, it has to
> do
>with justification, not default sizes.
Right, by "default" I was referring to a default minimum size block assigned to
a particular product (I would guess this would normally be in the range of /29
to /27). I
On Mar 15, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Andrew Elliott wrote:
> Looking for information on the current standard practices for charging
> customers
> for larger than default v4 assignments.
>
> Especially with the rapidly depleting v4 space, how are SP's handling these
> requests? Is it safe to assume cu
Hello,
Looking for information on the current standard practices for charging
customers
for larger than default v4 assignments.
Especially with the rapidly depleting v4 space, how are SP's handling these
requests? Is it safe to assume customers requesting larger blocks are willing
to pay a p
Morning all - anyone here responsible for any of the following:
213.123.192.0/20 (BT-ADSL)
193.179.160.0/22 (KULAJ-NET)
174.132.0.0/15 (NETBLK-THEPLANET-BLK-15)
65.75.128.0/18 (MSG-65-75-128-0)
Abuse/Technical contacts gone unanswered for each (mailed 1 - 2 months
ago). *sigh*
Getting multiple br
25 matches
Mail list logo