Hello,
We are working on a research project that is trying to identify
the root cause of some stray network traffic we are seeing.
If you run any software from Tobit and are willing to spare some
time to help us track down the root cause of this traffic we would
really appreciate your help.
Pl
this is obviously no news and the attachment as you all probably know
is a trojan executable.
The interesting part and kind of a test to determine who is more
stupid, the one sending the message or the one opening and executing
the attachment, the message is supposedly sent by UPS but signed as
DH
> -Original Message-
> From: ML
> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 1:44 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Surcharge for providing Internet routes?
>
> Has anyone here heard of or do they themselves charge extra for
> providing a complete internet table to customers?
>
> Waive the surcharge
> I don't think there is a universally agreed upon definition of what
> transit means other than it involves someone paying someone else.
Uhh, "transit" is an English word which comes from the Latin word
meaning "it goes across". Transit has nothing to do with payment
at all. The only thing that e
On Tue, 4 May 2010 16:44:06 +0200 (CEST)
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Tue, 4 May 2010, Chris Boyd wrote:
>
> > Most of the ADSL installations I've seen in SBC 13 state area had
> > interleaving turned on, which significantly increases latency. I
> > suspect that's why many cable MSOs in the
--- swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
From: Mikael Abrahamsson
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Scott Weeks wrote:
> "Interleaved" turned on to correct errors. This adds ~25msec between
> the CPE and the nearest router. Sometimes folks ask for it to be
> changed to "Fast". We explain that errors may cause resync
We're an ISP that has four access technologies. Both cable and DSL modem
link times are affected by configured rate and sync rate, respectively.
My home CM is at 15/1 Mbps and one-way latency is 4 to 5 msec. My home DSL
modem is at 15/1 Mbps (with interleaving) and has a one-way latency of 15
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
Thai SPs are required by law to block sites deemed objectionable by the
government of Thailand; common reasons given include lese majeste and/or
other materials deemed injurious to 'national security'.
+1.
When I was in thailand the (my guess) URL i
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Scott Weeks wrote:
"Interleaved" turned on to correct errors. This adds ~25msec between
the CPE and the nearest router. Sometimes folks ask for it to be
changed to "Fast". We explain that errors may cause resyncs to happen
and then make the change if the customer still w
Our sincere apologies if you receive multiple copies of this
announcement.
---
-
CALL FOR PAPERS
The 7th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and
Computing
- Building Smart Worlds in R
** Apologies if you receive multiple copies of this CFP. **
Dear Colleagues:
Please disseminate this message in your networks / subscribed lists.
We also invit
I've had no problems with it. Seems to be much better than the
residential service. The /29 was only $10? I must be getting jipped,
I'm paying $20.
Tim Burke
630.617.1300 Cell
t...@tburke.us Email
Sent from my iPhone
On May 4, 2010, at 12:52 PM, "Owen DeLong" wrote:
> LoL... I'm using that
LoL... I'm using that same service (without the /29 for $10/month) as transport
for my
tunneled setup.
Owen
On May 4, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Tim Burke wrote:
> I'm using Comcast's business-class service. ~$110 per month for 22mbit down,
> 5mbit up and a /29.
>
> This would definitely be your best
--- cb...@gizmopartners.com wrote:
From: Chris Boyd
On May 4, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> I am not sure what the point is in mixing in speed of light
> latency. If your "typical sites" are, say, Indian cricket
> blogs, you will typically have a high latency from the US.
> What
I'm using Comcast's business-class service. ~$110 per month for 22mbit down,
5mbit up and a /29.
This would definitely be your best bet as opposed to trying to rig up a
tunneled setup. You can also get their 12mbit down, 2mbit up service with a /29
for $79, iirc.
__
On May 4, 2010, at 11:03 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Is anyone aware whether or not Thailand has a centralized firewall on
> Internet access?
Thai SPs are required by law to block sites deemed objectionable by the
government of Thailand; common reasons given include lese majeste and/or other
mat
Hi,
Is anyone aware whether or not Thailand has a centralized firewall on Internet
access?
We've had reports from several folks in Thailand that they are unable to get to
some IP addresses in our network (this problem is reproducible on the
traceroute.org Thailand sites as well).
It seems to
On May 4, 2010, at 8:42 AM, isabel dias wrote:
> Is cable better for gamming?
All the LAN party places I know of use Metro Ethernet solutions. Gamers like
low ping times to their servers, and are willing to spend $$ to get them. So
if your target market includes people who play a lot of fir
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Chris Boyd wrote:
Most of the ADSL installations I've seen in SBC 13 state area had
interleaving turned on, which significantly increases latency. I
suspect that's why many cable MSOs in the same territory have "cable is
better for gaming" marketing campaigns running all t
On Tue, 04 May 2010 06:42:59 PDT, isabel dias said:
> Is cable better for gaming?
Depends on the game and the gamer. Personally, it doesn't matter to me, as
even if I was on my employer's 10GE uplink, I'd still lose to some snot-nosed
brat with fast reflexes on a 56kb modem. So till they invent
Is cable better for gamming?
- Original Message
From: isabel dias
To: Chris Boyd ; NANOG
Sent: Tue, May 4, 2010 2:41:48 PM
Subject: Re: Emulating ADSL bandwidth shaping
same as in the HFC and QAM modulation values and so on and so forth .
services that are requiring a connection
same as in the HFC and QAM modulation values and so on and so forth .
services that are requiring a connection-oriented service such as a gaming
clan/cloud are highly affected when working in latency and jitter network based
environments such as the ethernet based ones and SMDS ...
--
On May 4, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> I am not sure what the point is in mixing in speed of light latency. If your
> "typical sites" are, say,
> Indian cricket blogs, you will typically have a high latency from the US.
> What does that tell
> you about your DSL or Cable system,
On May 4, 2010, at 8:02 AM, Dave Hart wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 08:54 UTC, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote, quoting
Patrick:
For emulating cable traffic, latencies (in the USA) will be about
60-80ms to typical sites.
[...]
For DSL, I seem to recall latency being about 90-110ms (note, I
haven'
Hi!
Either you're looking only at the loop contribution, or you're in the
SF bay area and nearly every "typical site" is available locally.
Here in the relatively backwater Seattle suburbs, unless it's served
by Microsoft or a content distribution network, there are substantial
latencies to typi
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 08:54 UTC, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote, quoting Patrick:
>> For emulating cable traffic, latencies (in the USA) will be about
>> 60-80ms to typical sites.
[...]
>> For DSL, I seem to recall latency being about 90-110ms (note, I haven't
>> used DSL in many years).
[...]
> The lat
Hi!
- do ISPs typically use token bucket filters with large bursts to shape traffic?
- what kind of burst sizes and latencies/limits are typically used for
the filter?
You will definitely have to account for latency.
For emulating cable traffic, latencies (in the USA) will be about
60-80ms t
27 matches
Mail list logo
