I will sugest to test the throughput when a BGP peer is flapping.
-Original Message-
From: Michael J McCafferty
Sent: 23 iulie 2009 03:05
To: nanog
Subject: What else shall we test?
All,
We are putting together a test plan to test a pair of Cisco 7206 VXR's,
each with with NPE-G
On Jul 22, 2009, at 7:41 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:27:39 +0100
From: "andrew.wallace"
Big up the Nanog community, you do the net proud...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8163190.stm
First showed up on NANOG 7 hours ago, but it was a fun read.
Clearly the arti
All,
We are putting together a test plan to test a pair of Cisco 7206 VXR's,
each with with NPE-G2. The purpose of the test is just to make sure we
know where their realistic limits are with a real configuration, full
route tables from two providers, etc. We have one JDSU T-Berd 8000 test
s
> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 21:27:39 +0100
> From: "andrew.wallace"
>
> Big up the Nanog community, you do the net proud...
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8163190.stm
First showed up on NANOG 7 hours ago, but it was a fun read.
Clearly the article has little connection with reality. I
Big up the Nanog community, you do the net proud...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8163190.stm
We've been using Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold for many years. Their recent
improvements to the product have been mainly system monitoring stuff.
The product has grown in capabilities hugely since version 4 when we started
with them (they are on version 12 now), and with that improvement in
capabiliti
It's neither open source, nor free, but I moved from Nagios/Groundwork
to Solarwinds ipMonitor 9.
Solarwinds recently cut the price down to under $1000 for unlimited
monitors. Up until about a year ago, the unlimited license ran about
$5K.
So for a large nationwide environment like ours, our R
Why are you a "small start-up" and needing 600M-1G of pipe, and from
3x carriers? You can't use 150-200M via GigE ports and scale as needed
(assuming you aren't bound to a SONET loop)?
We started our IP backbone in 2005 with 3x 300M connections on
6509/maxed-Sup2s with 85% BGP tables and 6516-GBIC
Matthew Huff wrote:
Some of our requirements:
. Native agents for Windows 2003/2008, Linux, Linux x86_64, Solaris Sparc
and Solaris x86_64. Either binaries or source code.
. Ability to send alerts via email, pager and/or snmp
. Monitoring of OS properties like memory, disk, cp
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:08:29 -0400
Matthew Huff wrote:
> I apologize for not starting a new thread before, I didn't realize that the
> nanog mailing list created a thread-index rather than using the subject.
It's not the nanog mailing list, it's your own email client (and ours)
that keeps the th
I apologize for not starting a new thread before, I didn't realize that the
nanog mailing list created a thread-index rather than using the subject.
Even though NANOG is primarily for network operators, I know that a number of
members work in NOCs where there is also monitoring of servers/applic
It really depends on your application server configuration.
Most people just uses SNMP for this purpose.
Something like net-snmp installed in servers, then monitor the info via
SNMP MIB polling.
Alex
Matthew Huff wrote:
> I think all of these comments are useful. but we are looking for NMS for
Matthew Huff wrote:
> Just an FYI, I didn't hijack this thread, I'm the one that started it. If
> you look at the Subject line it says NMS for Server hardware / Application
> monitoring not for router/switch monitoring. Regardless, the suggestions and
> info is good for everyone, I just wanted to p
Just an FYI, I didn't hijack this thread, I'm the one that started it. If
you look at the Subject line it says NMS for Server hardware / Application
monitoring not for router/switch monitoring. Regardless, the suggestions and
info is good for everyone, I just wanted to push a bit back towards the
o
Matthew Huff writes:
> Nagios http://www.nagios.org
http://www.icinga.org/ - a (very current) fork of Nagios
http://software.uninett.no/stager/ - another netflow tool
http://nedi.ch - For those with larger campus networks
http://nipper.titania.co.uk/ - audit tool for different netw
I think all of these comments are useful. but we are looking for NMS for
server/application monitoring, not snmp/dmi based polling. We will need a
system that runs custom scripts to monitor our servers (CPU, OS syslogs,
Windows Event logs, hardware, memory, etc) and our in-house applications
runnin
Eric Gauthier wrote:
Hello,
As for server / application / random other stuff (like printers and
ups's and IP camera and the like), Zenoss is great -- its clean,
simple, fast(ish), easy and pretty -- the last one happens to be
important for some folks (esp in the enterprise world...)
Hello,
> As for server / application / random other stuff (like printers and
> ups's and IP camera and the like), Zenoss is great -- its clean,
> simple, fast(ish), easy and pretty -- the last one happens to be
> important for some folks (esp in the enterprise world...)
We've looked at Zen
Graeme Fowler wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8163190.stm
Some of it is right. Some of it is wrong. All of it makes for
interesting reading from the point of view of a layperson.
We are all, apparently, unsung heroes...
Graeme
PS Yes, there's plenty to tear apart in the article. Do
On 7/22/09 9:48 AM, Jim Wininger wrote:
> What do you consider a "small start-up ISP"? What kind of upstream
> connectivity are you considering (or at least falls under the category
of
> small isp) bandwidht, bgp etc?
two or three upstreams - OC-12 to 1G to each (BGP full tables)
three "POPs" me
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 09:39:25AM -0400, R. Benjamin Kessler wrote:
> There has been a lot of good feedback regarding the deficiencies of the
> 7600 platform...
>
> So, the new question is: what platforms should a small, start-up ISP
> consider when looking to provide Ethernet services to their c
Juniper M10i versus Cisco ASR 1000
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Jim Wininger wrote:
> What do you consider a "small start-up ISP"? What kind of upstream
> connectivity are you considering (or at least falls under the category of
> small isp) bandwidht, bgp etc?
>
>
> On 7/22/09 9:39 AM, "R. B
What do you consider a "small start-up ISP"? What kind of upstream
connectivity are you considering (or at least falls under the category of
small isp) bandwidht, bgp etc?
On 7/22/09 9:39 AM, "R. Benjamin Kessler" wrote:
> There has been a lot of good feedback regarding the deficiencies of the
Warren Kumari wrote:
As for server / application / random other stuff (like printers and
ups's and IP camera and the like), Zenoss is great -- its clean, simple,
fast(ish), easy and pretty -- the last one happens to be important for
some folks (esp in the enterprise world...)
Just expect i
There has been a lot of good feedback regarding the deficiencies of the
7600 platform...
So, the new question is: what platforms should a small, start-up ISP
consider when looking to provide Ethernet services to their customers?
- Scalability - 100M, 1G, 10G access speeds (backplane limitations,
For networking stuff, see Joe Abley and Stephen Stuart's NANOG 26
Tutorial "Managing IP Networks with Free Software" -- http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog26/abstracts.php?pt=Nzg1Jm5hbm9nMjY=&nm=nanog26
Direct link to PDF: http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog26/presentations/stephen.pdf
-- it'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8163190.stm
Some of it is right. Some of it is wrong. All of it makes for
interesting reading from the point of view of a layperson.
We are all, apparently, unsung heroes...
Graeme
PS Yes, there's plenty to tear apart in the article. Don't shoot the
messenger
27 matches
Mail list logo
