> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Mark Kosters wrote:
>> ARIN is now signing the /8 zones that it is authoritative for (eg
>> 192.in-addr.arpa, etc).
> Thanks!
indeed!
randy
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Mark Kosters wrote:
> Hi
>
> ARIN is now signing the /8 zones that it is authoritative for (eg
> 192.in-addr.arpa, etc).
Thanks! (in case no one else mentioned it)
-Chris
>
> This the phase two of a three-phase process. Given that in-addr.arpa is
> not yet signed,
>
>
>> Without continuing the L3 pile-on, one can easily glean from their public
>> filings that they have never properly filled out their management depth in
>> acquisition absorption and/or sufficiently empowered those folks. The
>> billions in revenue lost from acquisitions like Genuity and othe
I could not agree with the points below more.
Prior to the mergers, I had multiple services each with Looking Glass,
Wiltel and Broadwing and Level3. After Level3's round of acquisitions
the service level for all four of them went way down.
I've had the experience of not being able to resol
Without continuing the L3 pile-on, one can easily glean from their public
filings that they have never properly filled out their management depth in
acquisition absorption and/or sufficiently empowered those folks. The billions
in revenue lost from acquisitions like Genuity and others have told
Will Orton wrote:
We have an old Wiltel DS3 homed from their Anaheim POP... all traffic that's
not going to destinations on the old 7911 backbone seems to be backhauled to
Level3 in San Jose before getting anywhere else, like so:
1 (internal)
2 (internal)
3 (internal)
4 anhmca1wcx1-a
We have an old Wiltel DS3 homed from their Anaheim POP... all traffic that's
not going to destinations on the old 7911 backbone seems to be backhauled to
Level3 in San Jose before getting anywhere else, like so:
1 (internal)
2 (internal)
3 (internal)
4 anhmca1wcx1-atm10-0-0.wcg.net (64.2
Is anyone experiencing AT&T issues with their ANIRA service. We are getting
a vague "infrastructure issues" answer from AT&T. This is affecting us
nationwide.
Michael
We were a former Wiltel customer that was bought out by Level 3. Wiltel
service had been great, and then as soon as level 3 took over, things
went downhill. We had GigE service, and wanted another line, but Level
3 said they didn't want to sell any more ports on Wiltel gear. We also
had seri
Hi
ARIN is now signing the /8 zones that it is authoritative for (eg
192.in-addr.arpa, etc).
This the phase two of a three-phase process. Given that in-addr.arpa is
not yet signed, we have published a list of trust anchors that you can
download to configure on your local recursive resolvers.
Add
From: nanog@nanog.org
>
> We're not very happy with Level3 anymore either, terrible support, no
> RFO is ever given, tickets are closed with no explanation at
> all. They
> bought so many providers close together that they have a lot
> of work to
> do to integrate everything into a workable
We're not very happy with Level3 anymore either, terrible support, no
RFO is ever given, tickets are closed with no explanation at all. They
bought so many providers close together that they have a lot of work to
do to integrate everything into a workable set of products.
George Carey wrote:
As a Level 3 customer who had connectivity to some legacy Wiltel equipment I
can also attest that service levels were pretty bad following that merger.
We had a few memorable outages where escalations were necessary to get
things resolved and folks familiar with the equipment were hard to find.
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Scott Howard wrote:
We're looking at getting connectivity via Level 3 in a particular
datacenter, but we're being told that it's "legacy Wiltel/Looking Glass"
rather than "true" Level 3.
Given that both of these acquisitions occurred years ago should I be
worried, or is this
14 matches
Mail list logo
