On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Check: http://www.space.net/~gert/RIPE/ipv6-filters.html for a list of
suggested filter expressions that cover all of these correctly.
Unfortunately, the JunOS version of the strict filter is blocking
/32's from APNIC region as well. The offending lin
GRE.
The problem we have (I think) is that the tunnel goes to something other
than the direct router we have the DS3 on.
The tunnel goes:
vzb->ds3 router->ethernet->another router
We aren't able to do more than a 1500 byte MTU, so when they send
packets larger than 1380 or so, the packets never
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Paul Timmins wrote:
You too, huh?
Is your IPv6 tunnel with vzb using GRE or 6-in-4 encapsulation?
Antonio Querubin
whois: AQ7-ARIN
On 11/18/08 9:59 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Michael Sinatra wrote:
On 11/18/08 9:26 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Nathan Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wish them good luck in reaching the DNS root servers.
They are in "critical infrastructure" space, whi
Christopher Morrow wrote:
GRH is too slow to get me an answer on what it thinks the v6 table
size should be :( Geoff says though:
1627 routes
(http://bgp.potaroo.net/v6/as2.0/index.html)
route-views6 is another good place to look. 1481 is the max
seen there. Perhaps there are some internal/c
You too, huh?
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 10:05 -1000, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
> > traceroute6 to the ISC's v6 allocation(s) for f-root ... (from inside
> > 701) oh, not working...
> > traceroute6 to ipv6.google.com from inside 701, oh... not working e
Having no route is not a problem, you should get a destination
unreachable directly and all is fine because IPv4 should be used as a
fallback.
The big problem is when you have a route to them, but they don't have a
route back. You don't get destination unreachables, but instead get
timeou
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Christopher Morrow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Nathan Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I wish them good luck in reaching the DNS root servers.
>> They are in "critical infrastructure" space, which is a single /32 with
>
> t
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Christopher Morrow wrote:
traceroute6 to the ISC's v6 allocation(s) for f-root ... (from inside
701) oh, not working...
traceroute6 to ipv6.google.com from inside 701, oh... not working either.
vzb's v6 table is far from complete :( which is pretty painful.
That's not all
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Crist Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >>> On 11/18/2008 at 11:03 AM, "Tim Durack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> Not
>>> On 11/18/2008 at 11:03 AM, "Tim Durack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Not long ago, ARIN changed the IPv6 policy so that
>>> residential subscribers could be i
On 19/11/2008, at 4:26 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Nathan Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wish them good luck in reaching the DNS root servers.
They are in "critical infrastructure" space, which is a single /32
with
traceroute6 to the ISC's v6 alloc
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Not long ago, ARIN changed the IPv6 policy so that
>> residential subscribers could be issued with a /56
>> instead of the normal /48 assignment. This was done
>> so t
>
> Try out the GUI thing.
>
> I know people will go "GUIs are for idiots!" and all that.
>
Agree, the SAM is excellent, esp the XML interface to it.
Regards,
Neil.
--
Neil J. McRae -- Alive and Kicking.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:26:36PM -0500, Christopher
> Morrow wrote:
>> traceroute6 to the ISC's v6 allocation(s) for f-root ... (from inside
>> 701) oh, not working...
>> traceroute6 to ipv6.google.com from inside 701, oh... not working either.
>>
>> vz
Michael Sinatra wrote:
> On 11/18/08 9:26 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Nathan Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I wish them good luck in reaching the DNS root servers.
>>> They are in "critical infrastructure" space, which is a single /32
>>> with
>>
>>
In a message written on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:26:36PM -0500, Christopher
Morrow wrote:
> traceroute6 to the ISC's v6 allocation(s) for f-root ... (from inside
> 701) oh, not working...
> traceroute6 to ipv6.google.com from inside 701, oh... not working either.
>
> vzb's v6 table is far from com
Christopher Morrow wrote:
if you want v6 adoption... latency, path length, jitter, performance
all should closely match v4 specs. Expecting a US customer to be 'ok'
with 300ms to reach a US site 30 miles (as the crow flies) via
Germany... not good.
V6 so far doesn't have the same $$ and interest
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Michael Sinatra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/18/08 9:26 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Nathan Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>I wish them good luck in reaching the DNS root servers.
>>> They are in "critical i
Michael Sinatra wrote:
> On 11/18/08 9:26 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Nathan Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I wish them good luck in reaching the DNS root servers.
>>> They are in "critical infrastructure" space, which is a single /32
>>> with
>>
>>
On 11/18/08 9:26 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Nathan Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wish them good luck in reaching the DNS root servers.
They are in "critical infrastructure" space, which is a single /32 with
traceroute6 to the ISC's v6 allocation(s)
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Nathan Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wish them good luck in reaching the DNS root servers.
> They are in "critical infrastructure" space, which is a single /32 with
traceroute6 to the ISC's v6 allocation(s) for f-root ... (from inside
701) oh, not worki
Having a mail issue looking for hotmail contact.
Thanks,
Jason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are there any parties out there routing /48 IPv6 networks globally? I ran
> into a supposed Catch-22 with Verizon and IPv6 address space and was
> looking for clarification.
Let them signup to GRH (http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/) then it will be
very easy to see whi
Nathan Ward wrote:
I'd prefer to
make my routers respond from loopback or something.
Wouldnt we all...how is that done again?
ated-afrinic-20081118 | grep -w 48
afrinic|TZ|ipv6|2001:43f8::|48|20070711|assigned
afrinic|KE|ipv6|2001:43f8:10::|48|20070713|assigned
afrinic|ZA|ipv6|2001:43f8:20::|48|20070726|assigned
afrinic|ZA|ipv6|2001:43f8:30::|48|20070730|assigned
afrinic|ZA|ipv6|2001:43f8:40::|48|20070921|assigned
afrinic|ZA|ip
This 100-line document contains 62% of what you need to know to avoid annoying
10,000 people in your email to the NANOG list. It also containers pointers
to another 23%. Please take 5 minutes to read it before you post [again].
General Information
===
About NANOG:http:
27 matches
Mail list logo
