The big problem is when you have a route to them, but they don't have a route back. You don't get destination unreachables, but instead get timeouts, and pain, and misery (btdt). :(Having no route is not a problem, you should get a destination unreachable directly and all is fine because IPv4 should be used as a fallback.
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Owen DeLong
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Frank Habicht
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nathan Ward
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Joe Maimon
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Christopher Morrow
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Joel Jaeggli
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Christopher Morrow
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jack Bates
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jeroen Massar
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Perry Lorier
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Michael Sinatra
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Florian Weimer
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Nathan Ward
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Mohacsi Janos
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Florian Weimer
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Jack Bates
- RE: IPv6 routing /48s Tony Hain
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Niels Bakker
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Mark Andrews
- Re: IPv6 routing /48s Niels Bakker