How is the state of arts of NETCONF (RFC 4741) protocol?
Is there any Network Management System Deployed which is base on NETCONF?
Do you think security products (like Firewall, IDS/IPS and Security
Operation Centre) can benefit from NETCONF?
Thanks in advance,
Devin
___
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:51 AM, Deepak Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are there any good (published) BCPs for building out Municipal WiFi
> networks? Particularly in the security/authentication/scaling areas?
>
Ask Earthlink, they just announced pulling out of Philly .. and I
guess they had
Are there any good (published) BCPs for building out Municipal WiFi
networks? Particularly in the security/authentication/scaling areas?
Thanks in advance,
DJ
___
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Steven M. Bellovin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 13:30:52 -0400
> "Christopher Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Oh, how do you know you can trust the VPN folks anymore than the
>> cable-modem folks though? eventually the same cost issues
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Luke S Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Christopher Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Oh, how do you know you can trust the VPN folks anymore than the
>> cable-modem folks though? eventually the same cost issues are going to
>> arise for the VPN folks as
On Thu, 15 May 2008 13:30:52 -0400
"Christopher Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Oh, how do you know you can trust the VPN folks anymore than the
> cable-modem folks though? eventually the same cost issues are going to
> arise for the VPN folks as did for cable-modem/dsl folks (downward
> p
"Christopher Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, how do you know you can trust the VPN folks anymore than the
> cable-modem folks though? eventually the same cost issues are going to
> arise for the VPN folks as did for cable-modem/dsl folks (downward
> pressure on pricing and infra/opex/cape
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Steven M. Bellovin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 09:46:05 -0400
> The other day, the Wall Street Journal ran a brief piece on VPN
> providers... The threat they had in mind was wireless hotspots, but
> any sort of on-link evil can be dealt with
On May 15, 2008, at 12:38 AM, Erich Hohermuth wrote:
> Dear members,
>
> I just want to ask if anyone else have major troubles to install new
> or
> upgrade services with Global Crossing ?
>
> The story:
>
> Last year on December we ordered two layer2 point to point connections
> based on gigab
On Thursday 15 May 2008 16:23, Jay Hennigan wrote:
> Someone via nanog@nanog.org spammed:
> > Tired of
>
> [snip]
>
> Can anyone suggest a faster way to get yourself blackholed than to spam
> this list?
Spammers still spam our abuse address, that might do it.
_
Someone via nanog@nanog.org spammed:
> Tired of
[snip]
Can anyone suggest a faster way to get yourself blackholed than to spam
this list?
--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/
Your local telephone and internet
On Thu, 15 May 2008 09:46:05 -0400
Jared Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 15, 2008, at 9:34 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > I've found that using SSL for all my SMTP and IMAP transactions
> > and not entering personally identifying information into non-SSL
> > web pages greatly reduces t
On May 15, 2008, at 9:34 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I've found that using SSL for all my SMTP and IMAP transactions
> and not entering personally identifying information into non-SSL
> web pages greatly reduces the amount of harvesting results I see.
>
> As to Charter, I opt out by simply not purch
I've found that using SSL for all my SMTP and IMAP transactions
and not entering personally identifying information into non-SSL
web pages greatly reduces the amount of harvesting results I see.
As to Charter, I opt out by simply not purchasing anything from them.
It seems to work far better than
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:47:22PM +0100, Simon Lockhart wrote:
> There's a company called Phorm (www.phorm.com) trying to do this in the UK,
> running some trials with some of the large broadband providers.
Phorm has been linked to the Russian Business Network (RBN), which
is unsurprising given t
I noticed this as well with a windows mobile device and activesync over the
ail. Enforcing SSL communication seems to have fixed it, as I no longer get
these after doing that. Of course this assumes that your mail server does not
need plain text authentication. I noticed this a lot when I was
Dear members,
I just want to ask if anyone else have major troubles to install new or
upgrade services with Global Crossing ?
The story:
Last year on December we ordered two layer2 point to point connections
based on gigabit ethernet connections. The main idea was to directly
connect to the peer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- wrote:
>Tired of overpaying for meds at your local pharm store? Here is the one
>stop solution for you:
>
Wow. How timely.
- - ferg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017)
wj8DBQFIK+GYq1pz9mNUZTMRAgbtAKCqkDM
18 matches
Mail list logo
