Hello Dear Mutters,
I am using version 1.3.28i.
I have defined a folder-hook as:
folder-hook !Trash "push unset maildir_trash"
But the error coming is 'push too many arguments'
How can I resolve this. Please point me where I am wrong.
Thanks in advance.
vikram...
--
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:17:29PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> Please do NOT reply to random messages, create a new thread instead.
>
Sorry for the goof up.
> try
> folder-hook !Trash "push 'unset maildir_trash'"
>
This problem is solved. But now I am having a problem further down in
the ho
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 11:39:01AM +0200, Cedric Duval wrote:
> Vikram Goyal wrote:
> > How can I prevent the action of saving messages if their are no tagged
> > messages according to the pattern.
>
> Nicolas has a patch for this.
>
> http://www.rachinsky.de/nic
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 04:23:31PM +0200, Cedric Duval wrote:
Hello Cedric,
> > Also I think that it should be the default of tag-prefix i.e
> > if the tag-pattern isn't there tag-prefix should abort
>
> Yes, I also think this would be better, at least for all these automatic
> operations deali
On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 07:35:43AM -0500, Patrick wrote:
> * Vikram Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-21-02 07:33]:
> > On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 05:17:58PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > > people who hide their name on purpose
> > > usually are a pita. they do not
>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:50:20PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> to write these to a file so he can monitor them.
> a menu would be nicer, of course, but... bloat?
>
> Sven
of-course not but an added functionality.
--
Vikram Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
people who experiment with
these features and can see what they are supplying to mutt and what its
getting.
Sven - just think about it.
--
Vikram Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t from
> netiquette guardians.', I was taught some lessons by the guardians. :-)
>
> Thank you.
> Bo
Also remember some people have taught their editors to remove sigs
automatically while replying. Just imagine what would happen to the
message with a top signature.
--
Vikram Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
kind of option, because when it's set or reset,
other options are also changed as a side effect.
CAREFUL: Setting or resetting this option can have a lot of
unexpected effects: Mappings are interpreted in another way, undo
behaves differently, etc. If you set this option in your vimrc
file, you should probably put it at the very start.
Hence put it at the top of your vimrc.
--
Vikram Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
^^
> -The Quiz Show
Well for that matter even if you bark you will get worshipped.
They just respect all of God's creation lock, stock & barrel.
Kinda OT but couldn't resist
--
Vikram Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
My query is not related to mutt as such but sendmail, so please excuse
me if it bothers you.
I need to tweak sendmail in such a way that it does not sends back
rejection messages back to one of the sending machine. The mails are all
for local domain but the sending software is proprietary
11 matches
Mail list logo
