Basic(?) Aliasing

2000-04-19 Thread Steffan Hoeke
^ allways the quotes ... for example alias shoeke"Steffan Hoeke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> etc... How come they don't show whent i get the sorted alias list??? Am i missing something basic, or TIA, Steffan

Re: Basic(?) Aliasing

2000-04-19 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 06:35:03PM +0200, Bodo Moeller muttered: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 06:25:58PM +0200, Steffan Hoeke wrote: > > > some of the adresses have the form > > "My name" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > others, on the other hand have

Re: Basic(?) Aliasing

2000-04-20 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 11:19:41PM -0400, David T-G muttered: > Steffan -- > > ...and then Steffan Hoeke said... > % On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 06:35:03PM +0200, Bodo Moeller muttered: > % > On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 06:25:58PM +0200, Steffan Hoeke wrote: > % > > % > &

source $TERM ?

2000-04-21 Thread Steffan Hoeke
Hi, I remember seeing a page / muttrc which used source "~/$TERM" to load a color scheme depending on the terminal used.. I forgot to bookmark it :-( Any ideas which one this could have been ? TIA, Steffan -- http://therookie.dyndns.org

no saved 'sent-mail' after upgrade to 1.1.11i

2000-04-21 Thread Steffan Hoeke
Hi all, Maybe it's a stupid question but: i upgraded to 1.1.11i and 'all of a sudden' my sent mail is no longer saved in the sent-mail folder :-( i see the fcc-hook active as ~/Maildir/sent-mail but : no new mail appears I also set the record variable to ~/Maildir/sent-mail, but to no avail..

Re: source $TERM ?

2000-04-22 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 01:58:30PM -0400, David T-G muttered: > Steffan -- > > I don't know which page you saw, but the theory is simple: just reference > $TERM where you'd like to have your particular terminal flavor. [snip] > source $HOME/.mutt.$TERM > in your .muttrc. I know, but I copied a

2 mutt-users lists ?!?!?!

2000-04-25 Thread Steffan Hoeke
I noticed there are 2 mailing list addresses in use : [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can anyone tell me what's the difference between the 2 ? TIA, Steffan -- http://therookie.dyndns.org

Re: 2 mutt-users lists ?!?!?!

2000-04-25 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 06:12:48PM -0400, David T-G wrote: > Steffan -- > > ...and then Steffan Hoeke said... > % > % [EMAIL PROTECTED] > % [EMAIL PROTECTED] > % > % Can anyone tell me what's the difference between the 2 ? > > It is the supposition of some t

Re: 2 mutt-users lists ?!?!?!

2000-04-25 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 03:18:03PM -0700, Drew Bloechl muttered: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 12:08:56AM +0200, Steffan Hoeke wrote: > > I noticed there are 2 mailing list addresses in use : > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > and > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > It's actual

Re: Multiple attachments

2000-04-29 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Sat, Apr 29, 2000 at 07:10:08PM +0100, Lars Hecking muttered: > Scott and Suzanne Cooley writes: > > How can I send multiple attachments using mutt? > > From the command line: you can use multiple -a options, although the > man page doesn't explicitly say so. > > From the send menu: just t

upgrade to 1.1.12i -=> strange behaviour :-(

2000-05-02 Thread Steffan Hoeke
Hi, After an upgrade to 1.1.12i I get the strange behaviour that every now and then I get the message "Mailbox externally modified, flags may be wrong" I don't know what's modifying my Maildir :-( The only change AFAIK is the mentioned upgrade ... TIA, Steffan -- http://therookie.dyndns.org

Re: Looking for a nice color scheme

2000-05-08 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 08:24:56PM +0200, Marius Gedminas muttered: > On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 11:40:55PM -0500, Corey G. wrote: > > Mutt Group, > > > > I am looking for what I would call a nice color scheme for Mutt. I > > currently use the scheme listed below but I would like to see what other

Re: Still alive?

2000-05-15 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 01:48:29AM +0200, clemensF muttered: > > Mikko Hänninen (Mon 15.0500-00:40): > > clemensF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 14 May 2000: > > > can this be done: everyone may optionally supply a "backup" email-address > > > which unsubscribe notification are forwarded to, s

Re: Still alive?

2000-05-15 Thread Steffan Hoeke
Sorry, But i'm not exactly sure what you want/mean :-( Bye, Steffan On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 06:39:05PM +0200, clemensF muttered: > > Steffan Hoeke (Mon 15.0500-12:02): > > > > EZMLM (http://www.ezmlm.org/) warns users for which messages bounce and > > eve

Re: Controlling default in save command?

2000-05-15 Thread Steffan Hoeke
You could use save-hook with, for example save-hook "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" +target or save-hook "~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]" +target or save-hook "~C [EMAIL PROTECTED]" +target Take a look at http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-3.html#ss3.14 HTH, Steffan On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 01:51:19PM -0

Re: Still alive?

2000-05-16 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 08:03:20AM +0200, Dennis Stosberg muttered: > Am 15.05.2000 um 12:02:54 schrieb Steffan Hoeke: > > > EZMLM (http://www.ezmlm.org/) warns users for which messages bounce and > > eventually removes them from the subscriber list ... > > > >

Re: DSN

2000-05-17 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 04:09:20PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian muttered: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > > > >How could I do to make mutt use this field : > > Return-Receipt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >to confirm the user [EMAIL PROTECTED] that I have read his mail ? >

Re: mutt and .signature

2000-05-17 Thread Steffan Hoeke
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 06:36:01PM +0100, Justin Megawarne muttered: > how do I stop mutt adding that annoying -- thing? > -- (yes this one right here) > __ _ __ _ > IMHO it's not something you'd really want to do... Part of an RFC states that the mes