Hi Salvatore!
In your muttrc add:
source ~/.mutt/gpg.rc
Check that .mutt/gpg.rc exists. If not it should be in the contrib section
of the tarball.
Sean
On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Salvatore Greco wrote:
> I'm appealing to the Mutt users who also use GPG for their privacy needs. I
> have installed GP
Hi Lars!
On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Lars Hecking wrote:
>> In your muttrc add: source ~/.mutt/gpg.rc Check that .mutt/gpg.rc exists.
>> If not it should be in the contrib section of the tarball.
>>
>> On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Salvatore Greco wrote:
>>
>>> I'm appealing to the Mutt users who also use GPG
Hi Lars!
On Sun, 13 Feb 2000, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
>> You are correct Lars, I thought he was having a problem using GPG and not
>> the warning, DOH!
>
> I thought so too, but because the original poster's error description was
> unclear and incomplete, I focused on the warning part instead
Hi Edmund!
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> I attach a public key with k, then I sign the message (with the
> same key). Why is the signature then bad? Attaching an ordinary file
> doesn't cause the same problem.
>
> Is it because I replace gpg-2comp by gpg in gpg.rc? If so, w
Hi Scott!
Use:
text/html; w3m -T text/html -dump %s; copiousoutput
Works for me.
Sean
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Scott A . McIntyre wrote:
> Has anyone gotten mutt (1.1.4i) to work with text/html attachments and
> the w3m browser? I've found w3m to be superior to lynx for things like
> forms and t
use
> without sacrificing the integrity of netscape's mailcapcan someone
> please send a mailcap file to me... i created one and it's not working
> at all...trying to work through some issues when i have time, and do any
> of us!
>
> ! Sean F Rima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Thomas!
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-02-22 13:01:39 -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
>
> > What type of macro could I set up so if I am in a specific folder
> > I could do a List Reply, when hitting r?
>
> folder-hook a "bind index r list-reply; bind pager r list-reply;
Hi Bennett!
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Bennett Todd wrote:
> 2000-01-29-19:41:36 Christopher Uy:
> > In the mean while, adding that 'h' flag to your rule should get
> > you by until then.
>
> Since the "h" makes it more efficient, it seems like a good idea to
> include anyway.
>
> Here's what I'm us
