Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

As of RFC 821 the local part of an e-mail address can consist of other characters than a-z0-9 and should then be quoted (see local-part and quoted-string). It seems though, that the mutt client does not support the use of an address like "address with spaces"@x42.com whi

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 11:30:14AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Magnus Bodin proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > >As of RFC 821 <http://rfc821.x42.com/> the local part of an e-mail address > >can consist of other characters than a-z0-9 and should then be quote

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 01:23:10AM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:05:05AM +0200, Magnus Bodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > As of RFC 821 <http://rfc821.x42.com/> the local part of an e-mail address > > can consist of other characters tha

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > Magnus Bodin muttered: > > > > As of RFC 821 <http://rfc821.x42.com/> the local part of an e-mail address > > can consist of other characters than a-z0-9 and should then be quoted (see > > local-par

Re: Mutt not following RFC822 strictly?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 09:43:28AM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 11:21:42AM +0200, Magnus Bodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 01:23:10AM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:05:05AM +0200, Magnus Bodin

Re: Mutt not following RFC821 strictly?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 03:37:11PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > > Magnus Bodin muttered: > > > > > > As of RFC 821 <http://rfc821.x42.com/> the local part of an e-mail address > > > can c

Re: Mutt not following RFC821/822 strictly?

On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 03:37:11PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote: > > > Look further down the thread. It is an error that may be qmail-inject > specific with arguments on the command line. And the solution seems to queue mail with a wrapper program. Attached is muttqmail.c that fix

Re: important flag

On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 06:20:26PM +0100, Marco Ahrendt wrote: > hi list, > > I searched the archive for any clues for this issue: > adding a headerfield for the importance of a mail. is there any patch > out yet? I found the ! flag in mutt but why does this flag isn´t set > automatic if the mail

Re: How can I see the entire e-mail?

On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 11:32:21AM -0800, Corina Cerbu wrote: > Hello! > I want to see the entire e-mails.With subject,text and attachement. > How can I do this? pipe the mail to less. like this: |less will show mail in pager totally unparsed and unformatted. Regards, /magnus -- http://x42.

Advanced searching revisited

Couldn't it be left as an exercise to the witted user or 3rd-party-developer to write a good search-enginge (probably based on grepmail) and PROVIDE A HOOK for invoking this search-function in conjunction with "limit". I'd like to press a key, invoke the search program which gets two arguments;

Re: threads, annoying threads

On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:47:58AM +0100, Jesper Holmberg wrote: > > Subject: Re: Konstituerande =?iso-8859-1?Q?m=F6te?= , FRV > > My guess would be that this means there is something wrong with the > character encoding between the systems. But how would one correct > this, apart from manually e

Re: Advanced searching revisited

On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:05:49PM +0100, Daniel González Gasull wrote: > Hi! :-) > > * Magnus Bodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote To [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > Couldn't it be left as an exercise to the witted > > user or 3rd-party-developer to write a good &g

Re: reply_regexp

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:39:29AM -0700, David T-G wrote: > specifically (yes, it's a really good time to be able to say > > set BASE_REGEXP='^((blah blah ...' > folder-hook linux set reply_regexp "\[linux\] $BASE_REGEXP" > folder-hook other set reply_regexp "\[OtherList\] $BASE_REGEXP" >

[yes/no] vs. [y/n]

I upgraded from 1.2.5i to 1.3.19i and the only awkward thing I find is that all question now goes ([yes] / no) and if i type 'n' it interprets as a YES, and I keep forgetting pressing 'N' Of course there must be information about this somewhere in the distribution 'Muttrc', but just try a sea

Re: [yes/no] vs. [y/n]

On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:27:06AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2001-07-11 08:22:09 +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote: > > >I upgraded from 1.2.5i to 1.3.19i and the only awkward thing I > >find is that all question now goes ([yes] / no) and if i type 'n' > >

Re: Simple mutt question ... I think?

of the message that you don't respond to. It's ok to send a message atop another when FORWARDING to a third party that is not the sender or a recipient of the original message. /magnus -- :::. Magnus Bodin ::. http://x42.com/ :::.

Re: [yes/no] vs. [y/n]

On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:40:13AM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 09:27:06AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > > On 2001-07-11 08:22:09 +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote: > > > > >I upgraded from 1.2.5i to 1.3.19i and the only awkward thing I > > >f

Re: MailDir vs. mbox (was: Re: vfolders)

orrectly followed the specification for maildirs, > duplicates would be impossible. No it's not. > http://cr.yp.to/proto/maildir.html "A unique name can be anything that doesn't contain a colon (or slash) and doesn't start with a dot." /magnus -- :::...

Re: MailDir vs. mbox (was: Re: vfolders)

On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:03:36PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 08:31:44PM +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 07:51:18PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote: > > > Procmail is severely broken in its creation of file names for maildirs. > >

Re: [yes/no] vs. [y/n]

On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 09:20:36AM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 08:22:09 +0200, Magnus Bodin wrote: > > I upgraded from 1.2.5i to 1.3.19i and the only awkward thing I find is that > > all question now goes ([yes] / no) and if i type 'n' it interp

Keywords? Filter-on-condition-when-sending?

send? OK. The easiest way may be to set "sendmail" to a wrapperscript that does everything and then piping, but is there any other way? E.g. when you mail to a certain mailadress? /magnus -- : Magnus Bodin . http://x42.com/ :::

Re: [Q] mutt with qmail

On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 10:32:26PM +0900, YOON, Joo-Yung wrote: > > I like using mutt. > > Recently I changed the MTA from exim to qmail, and experience a little > bit of confusing because it now does not move the read mails to other > mailbox. What do you mean by that? > Is there any one wh

Re: reply_regexp question

On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 08:32:33PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > > I'd be willing to bet that perl's implementation of regex is starkly > different than mutt's. mutts regexp == POSIX? Is it gnu or classic Henry Spencer? /magnus

Re: MUA statistics

On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 05:20:07PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 10:32:14AM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan (dis)graced my inbox >with: > > > Is this program something you wrote? I would love to run it on my > > > stuff, since I am on a lot of car and music related lists.

Re: how to decode mime encoded subjects?

On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 01:18:59AM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote: > Thus spake Andy Spiegl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Is there a unix tool (or another method) to convert something like this > > Subject: Para =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Carlos_Lavalle_?= > > into this > > Subject: Para José Carlos Lav

Re: save all outgoing messages to Fcc _and_ =sent

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:17:11PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Eric -- > > ...and then Eric Smith said... > % > % so that I may look in one place to check all the outgoing mail > % regardless of where is is fcc'ed? > % > % a simple (mutt) solution? > > Why not just set sent=+sentmail or such? D

Re: Mutt and Tiff's

On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:38:47PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > Hello, > I receive faxes in my mail these days but I cannot find anywhere > (and I have looked) for a viewer I could use in Mutt to read them > since they come in as tiff files. > > Any pointers ---> mailcap: image/x-fax-g3; v

Re: --without-iconv doesn't work?

On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 07:20:14AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote: > System: OpenBSD 2.8 > ./configure --without-iconv > doesn't work: > checking for catalogs to be installed... de ru it es uk fr pl nl cs id sk ko el >zh_TW zh_CN pt_BR eo gl sv da lt tr ja hu et ca > configure: error: Unable to find

Re: \222 instead of "'"

On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:04:56PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > Hi there, > > looks like Outlook (specifically: X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build > 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)) does something wrong when it base64-encodes a > message: single quote becomes "\222". Instead of "I'm not sure", mutt

Re: merging mailboxes

On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 03:36:01PM +0100, giorgian wrote: > hi all, > > if i have two mail folders and want to merge them in one avoiding > repetitions, how can i do? using this script: Uses memory for the Message-ID-hash at the moment. Should be easy to tweak for support for Maildir and then

Re: M$ Exchange Server

On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 02:54:33PM +0100, René Clerc wrote: > > Am I missing the point? I'm no Exchange guru, but can't you just use > pop, IMAP or fetchmail? Does Exchange honor the usual mail retrieval > protocols? They have to EXPLICITLY enable IMAP and/or POP3. Outlook uses a proprietary pr

Re: charset="ks_c_5601-1987" -> ???

On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:47:15PM +0300, Im Eunjea wrote: > * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-08 19:22]: > > Mutt decodes messages with the following > > charset to only a bunch of question marks: > > > > Content-Type: text/html; > > charset="ks_c_5601-1987" > >[...] > > If

Re: my-hdr entry disappears after editing headers

On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 02:10:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > > > > I wanted to achieve that outgoing messages are sent to my alternate > > address which I use at work. There I use the X-Label entry to filter > > the mails with procmail and move them to a seperate folder. > > Gaack! That means t

Re: my-hdr entry disappears after editing headers

On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 08:19:40AM +0100, Magnus Bodin wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 02:10:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > > > > > > I wanted to achieve that outgoing messages are sent to my alternate > > > address which I use at work. There I use the X-Label e

Re: Scripted GPG-encrypted mails

On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:23:49PM +, Dave Smith wrote: > Hi all. > > I'm trying to write a script which will mail any file specified as an > argument, to a specific user. However, I need the mail to be sent > GPG-encrypted. It will at some point either require you to 1. Have an e

Re: POP New Messages

On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 12:05:40AM -0800, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote: > > OK, I'll bite. How do you tell fetchmail to download only new mail? You don't tell fetchmail anything. If you care to read the manfile; "Disposal Options -a, --all (Keyword: fetchall) Retrieve both ol

Re: Converting mbox to Maildir

On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 09:38:42AM -0800, Tyrin R. Price wrote: > Are any tools or guidance available for converting mailboxes > from mbox to Maildir? Mutt will do. 1. Create a maildir. 2. Open the mbox in mutt. 3. Tag all, save to Maildir. or if you want to batch it;

Re: Saving encrypted

On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:20:56AM +1100, David Clarke wrote: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Alan Batie wrote: > > > > > Sooo, before I waste too much more time on this, I thought I'd see if > > anyone else has solved this problem... > > > > The way I got around this problem was to put "encrypt-to " i