Re: Re: Is linewrap dead?

2022-08-30 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-08-29 19:07, Tavis Ormandy wrote: > On 2022-08-29, Logan Rathbone wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:43:45AM EDT, Tavis Ormandy wrote: > >> No, format=flowed sounds like the perfect solution but I've tested and > >> as far as I can tell it's ignored by gmail on Android, for example. > >

Re: Re: Is linewrap dead?

2022-08-30 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-08-30 14:58, Kurt Hackenberg wrote: On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:09:34AM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: I would consider f=f an acceptable compromise, because while it looks nicer on (some) mail clients, it breaks automatic list indentation created in vim (fo-n). The following is

Re: Postponing and forwarding

2022-08-31 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-08-31 11:51, X Tec wrote: When composing an email, I decided to postpone instead of immediately send. It got saved in Drafts folder, but when deciding to send it, I opened the draft, but there's no "send" option; just the usual respond, new email, and the other options when opening any

Re: Re: Is linewrap dead?

2022-09-03 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-09-03 00:46, Derek Martin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 07:45:05PM -0400, John Hawkinson wrote: > > Derek Martin wrote on Wed, 31 Aug 2022 > > at 19:35:15 EDT in <20220831233515.gf13...@bladeshadow.org>: > > > > Evaluating the strength of a SHOULD requires looking at pragmatic > > rea

Handling multiple From addresses

2022-09-04 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi, I use a couple of From addresses, and currently change the default From address and BCC address manually, and select the matching PGP key for signing afterwards (PGP menu → sign as → [From address] → select key). This can probably be done much more efficiently, so my questions are: - Can I de

Re: Re: Is linewrap dead?

2022-09-04 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-09-04 20:37, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 04Sep2022 15:34, raf via Mutt-users wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 01:51:25PM +1000, Cameron Simpson > > wrote: > > > The `md2html` script is my personal script, which wraps `pandoc` > > > and post munges the HTML to indent the code blocks, w

Re: Re: Handling multiple From addresses

2022-09-06 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-09-05 19:16, Ofer Inbar wrote: > What I did for this was select a few esc-capital hotkey combos > and define macros like this in my muttrc: > > macro generic \eF ":source ~/.mutt/headers.f...\r" > macro generic \eH ":source ~/.mutt/headers.h...\r" > > And so on. (I replaced the actual fi

Re: Re: Handling multiple From addresses

2022-09-06 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-09-07 08:04, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 06Sep2022 09:26, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > Thank you! This is exactly what I needed. I tweaked your version a bit > > to use the standard parameters for setting the required values: > > > > set from="x...@e

Re: Re: [Mutt] Is linewrap dead? Now: Self hosted SMTP

2022-09-13 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-09-12 21:59, bastian-muttu...@t6l.de wrote: > On 12Sep22 21:07+0200, Mihai Lazarescu wrote: > > Given the cheap VPS, I can mirror the setup on a second VPS from a different > > provider with quick DNS switch in case of issues. > > I just did that approx half a year ago. Before, everything

Re: Re: Handling multiple From addresses

2022-09-13 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-09-13 20:07, Robert wrote: > Hi there, > > On 2022-09-04 17:17, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > - Can I define multiple From addresses to select them from a list? > > - Can mutt be configured to switch the default BCC address to a changed > > From addres

Re: Re: Two doubts about POP3 and IMAP

2022-09-14 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-09-12 13:37, Kurt Hackenberg wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 01:32:25PM +0200, meine wrote: > > > on the POP3: it is my favourite because mails are on my own hard disk > > after downloading -- both for security and archiving. I have to dive > > into the possibilities of having the same fo

Re: Re: Loading several intialisation files at startup

2022-09-15 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-09-15 10:23, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > Hello, > > Many thanks for your reponse! > > Cameron Simpson (2022/09/15 08:27 +1000): > > I thought the common approach was what you next outline: a single muttrc > > which sources the appropriate account-specific muttrc. > > [...] > > For files

Re: Re: Re: Loading several intialisation files at startup

2022-09-15 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi Sébastien, On 2022-09-15 20:26, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > Hello Jan, thanks a lot for your response and the link! > > Jan Eden via Mutt-users (2022/09/15 11:42 +0200): > > I defined aliases for my accounts in .zshrc, because I do not mind > > restarting mutt when swi

Re: Re: Re: Re: Loading several intialisation files at startup

2022-09-15 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-09-15 21:23, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > Jan, > > I think I got it. > > Am I correct that, for each account, you have actually two files: one > that you use in your alias and one that you use in your macro. Is that > right? More or less: For three of my accounts, there is only a single

Re: Re: Loading several intialisation files at startup

2022-09-19 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-09-15 08:27, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 13Sep2022 16:50, Sébastien Hinderer > wrote: > > I would like to have a nice way to deal with several accounts in mutt. I > > am talking just about the .muttrc file aspect here. > > > > My present configuration is that each account has its own mut

Re: Recognizing alternative reply prefixes

2022-09-21 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi Jaron, On 2022-09-21 15:53, Jaron Kent-Dobias via Mutt-users wrote: > Hello, > > I am frequently exchanging emails with Italians, whose mail clients often > use the format 'R: [Subject]' in replies instead of 'Re: [Subject]'. Mutt > in my locale does not recognize the leading 'R:' as a reply

Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-08 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi, I recently configured mutt on a Linux system, and cannot display HTML messages in the default browser. mailcap contains the following lines: text/html; open %s; text/html; w3m -I %{charset} -T text/html; copiousoutput application/pdf; open %s; copiousoutput w3m is used automatically (auto_vi

Re: Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-08 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-10-08 09:34, Chris Green wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 10:25:29AM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I recently configured mutt on a Linux system, and cannot display HTML > > messages in the default browser. mailcap contains the followin

Re: Re: Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-08 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-10-08 11:52, Chris Green wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 12:06:52PM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > On 2022-10-08 09:34, Chris Green wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 10:25:29AM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > &

Re: Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-09 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-10-09 08:18, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 08Oct2022 21:55, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > Thank you! This works well with Epiphany, but Firefox still fails (which > > I do not care about, as long as I have a working browser option). > > My recollection is that t

Mailcap and MS Word documents

2022-10-09 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi, after Chris Green's and Cameron Simpson's helpful advice regarding HTML messages, I dare to post another mailcap question. My mailcap contains the following lines: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document; ~/.mutt/view_attachment %s "-" application/vnd.openxml

Re: Mailcap and MS Word documents

2022-10-09 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-10-09 10:20, Jan Eden wrote: > Hi, > > after Chris Green's and Cameron Simpson's helpful advice regarding HTML > messages, I dare to post another mailcap question. > > My mailcap contains the following lines: > > application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document; >

Re: Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-10 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-10-10 08:58, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 09Oct2022 09:35, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > Yes, I did use Chris Green's helper script, and it does work with > > Epiphany, but not with Firefox. > > Maybe it would prefer a "file:///path/to/file.html&quo

Re: Re: Re: Viewing HTML message with Firefox

2022-10-10 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2022-10-10 08:42, José María Mateos wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 12:27:52PM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > The problem was related to the target dir (/tmp/mutt_attach). Although > > it was accessible by the current user, Firefox was not able to display > >

PGP signed messages and MS Outlook

2022-12-05 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi, a couple of days ago, people using MS Outlook started complaing that my messages looked "strange". I asked for an example and received this: > > Subject: Re: Finanzierung > > > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; > > protocol="application/pgp-signat

Profiles and mutt-notmuch

2023-01-20 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi, I configured notmuch for my mail stores, and use mutt-notmuch according to the man page[1]: macro index "unset wait_key~/bin/mutt-notmuch --prompt search~/.cache/mutt_results" mutt is started with the -F parameter, and each parameter (work, personal etc) refers to a different mail store.

Re: Re: Forward with attachments

2023-04-22 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2023-04-22 14:58, Akkana Peck wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 04:02:36PM -0500, Jason wrote: > > > Is there a configuration that will make mutt's forwarding behavior more > > > like other clients I have used: body is quoted in the message, and > > > attachments are automatically attached? >

[OT] Terminal redraw issues / isync launchctl job in macOS 13.5

2023-08-07 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi, I recently upgraded to macOS 13.5, and for the first time, there are redraw issues in the Terminal with mutt (2.2.10, installed via Homebrew). Also, the launchctl job for isync/mbsync (1.4.4, also installed via Homebrew) fails since the upgrade. Has anyone else experienced similar issues with

Re: Re: [OT] Terminal redraw issues / isync launchctl job in macOS 13.5

2023-08-07 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2023-08-07 16:29, Dennis Preiser wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 03:47:53PM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > I recently upgraded to macOS 13.5, and for the first time, there are > > redraw issues in the Terminal with mutt (2.2.10, installed via > > Homebrew). Al

Re: Re: [OT] Terminal redraw issues / isync launchctl job in macOS 13.5

2023-08-07 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2023-08-07 15:59, Claus Assmann wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2023, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > I recently upgraded to macOS 13.5, and for the first time, there are > > redraw issues in the Terminal with mutt (2.2.10, installed via > > "Terminal" broke scree

Re: Re: Re: [OT] Terminal redraw issues / isync launchctl job in macOS 13.5

2023-08-09 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2023-08-07 19:18, Dennis Preiser wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 06:16:39PM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > On 2023-08-07 16:29, Dennis Preiser wrote: > >> Maybe it is sufficient to install a newer ncurses with homebrew. > > > > Even with ncurses 6.4

Re: Re: Re: Re: [OT] Terminal redraw issues / isync launchctl job in macOS 13.5

2023-08-10 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2023-08-10 09:37, Dennis Preiser wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 08:14:23AM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > On 2023-08-07 19:18, Dennis Preiser wrote: > >> Not surprising. You must somehow tell homebrew that for mutt > >> --with-curses=PATH/TO

Re: Re: [OT] Terminal redraw issues / isync launchctl job in macOS 13.5

2023-08-14 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2023-08-14 14:16, Will Yardley wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 03:47:53PM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > I recently upgraded to macOS 13.5, and for the first time, there are > > redraw issues in the Terminal with mutt (2.2.10, installed via > > Homebrew). Al

Avoiding S/MIME

2023-09-01 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi, my configuration sets a PGP default key: set pgp_default_key = ... and outgoing messages are signed accordingly. But every time I reply to a message signed using S/MIME, mutt tries to add an S/MIME signature, too (which fails, as there is no S/MIME key available via GPGME). How can I preven

Re: Re: Avoiding S/MIME

2023-09-02 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2023-09-01 16:15, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Hi, > > Jan Eden wrote: > > my configuration sets a PGP default key: > > > > set pgp_default_key = ... > > > > and outgoing messages are signed accordingly. But every time I reply > > to a message signed using S/MIME, mutt tries to add an S/MIME sign

Re: DKIM fails depending on Content-Transfer-Encoding

2023-09-06 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2023-09-06 13:33, f...@igh.de wrote: > Dear Mutt Users > > recently I experienced DKIM fails that depend on the > Content-Transfer-Encoding of messages text part. > > Being a german I use to write my messages in german with UTF-8 > encoding. I prefer plain text. My e-mails are DKIM signed. I

Re: Profiles and mutt-notmuch

2023-10-29 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi, for several years, I have used mutt with msmtp, and issues with sending messages were usually returned to mutt and displayed as an error. Recently, though, mutt displays "Mail sent" even when there is a problem (and the mail is not sent). I always used a simple msmtp configuration, and could

Re: Re: Profiles and mutt-notmuch

2023-10-29 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2023-10-29 14:17, Michael Kjörling wrote: > On 29 Oct 2023 14:44 +0100, from mutt-users@mutt.org (Jan Eden via > Mutt-users): > > for several years, I have used mutt with msmtp, and issues with sending > > messages were usually returned to mutt and displayed as an error.

Re: sending automated GPG signed mails from batch job

2024-05-21 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi Matthias, On 2024-05-21 07:45, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Hello, > > Our Library Management System sends mails to patrons and media vendors > which are assembled in a shell script with all data (Subject, body, To, > attachments, etc) by a call to the MUA mutt 2.1.1 which pipes the mail > to send

Display links in w3m output

2024-06-17 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi, I currently use the following entry in my mailcap to display HTML messages in mutt: text/html; w3m -dump -I %{charset} -T text/html -o display_link_number=1 %s; copiousoutput; This works well for me - with a numbered list of links at the end of the parsed message - but replying to such mess

Re: Re: Display links in w3m output

2024-06-18 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2024-06-18 05:59, Michael Kjörling wrote: > On 18 Jun 2024 07:25 +0200, from mutt-users@mutt.org (Jan Eden via > Mutt-users): > > Is there any way to display the links inline (e.g. > > Markdown-style) with w3m (or lynx)? > > lynx has -dump -list_inline which looks us

Re: Re: Handing on attempt to send

2024-06-20 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2024-06-20 01:20, Andrew D Arenson wrote: > Just to add -- I have, indeed, tried both port 587 and port 465 -- same > results. > > Point about this being SMTP and not IMAP is noted. Thanks! Could it be that the SMTP server's certificate changed, so the TLS connection fails because mutt refers

Re: Re: Display links in w3m output

2024-06-20 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2024-06-19 15:31, Will Yardley wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 07:25:48AM +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > text/html; w3m -dump -I %{charset} -T text/html -o display_link_number=1 > > %s; copiousoutput; > > Aside from the lynx suggestion that someone posted,

Non-ascii characters in recipient names

2024-06-21 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi, I noticed that non-ascii characters in recipient names become garbled recently (in Mutt 2.2.13, installed via Homebrew): "Basi´c, P." becomes "Basi´c, P." The effect is not visible when composing the message in mutt, but in the sent message (in the Sent mailbox), so it is not caused furt

Re: Non-ascii characters in recipient names

2024-06-21 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2024-06-21 09:44, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that non-ascii characters in recipient names become garbled > recently (in Mutt 2.2.13, installed via Homebrew): > > "Basi´c, P." > > becomes > > "Basi´c, P." > >

Re: Re: Non-ascii characters in recipient names

2024-06-24 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2024-06-21 10:34, Michael Kjörling wrote: > On 21 Jun 2024 09:52 +0200, from mutt-users@mutt.org (Jan Eden via > Mutt-users): > >> I noticed that non-ascii characters in recipient names become garbled > >> recently (in Mutt 2.2.13, installed via Homebrew

Re: Re: bouncing email and "from" address

2024-07-25 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2024-07-24 17:49, Ofer Inbar wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 09:17:13PM +0100, > Peter Flynn wrote: > > >However .. when I use the "bounce" feature, mutt is not using my From: > > >header. It's generating a From: address using the actual name of the > > >individual host, hy...@alfred.nasali

Filetype not set in vim after brew upgrade

2024-09-08 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi, this is a little off-topic, but maybe other mutt users are affected, too: Since upgrading to vim 9.1.700 this morning via homebrew, the filetype is not set automatically anymore when calling vim from mutt. I worked around this by setting the filetype explicitly in .muttrc – set editor='/opt/

Re: Re: Filetype not set in vim after brew upgrade

2024-09-09 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2024-09-09 00:41, Akshay Hegde via Mutt-users wrote: > On 2024-09-09 08:42 +0200, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this is a little off-topic, but maybe other mutt users are affected, > > too: Since upgrading to vim 9.1.700 this morning via homebrew,

Re: Re: Filetype not set in vim after brew upgrade

2024-09-09 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2024-09-09 11:32, Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Mo, 09 Sep 2024, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > The filename created for this reply looks like this – > > > > "/var/folders/ps/4v3k3hwj1jd9bdyq8sc4kptrgn/T/mutt-snafu-501-5821-14318527686633908551" >

Re: Re: mailcap on Windows WSL

2024-10-08 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2024-10-08 09:38, José María Mateos wrote: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024, at 08:55, Jan Eden via Mutt-users wrote: > > with open('/var/tmp/htmlfile', 'w', encoding='iso-8859-1') as tmp_file: > > ... > > > > but this only changed the e

Re: Re: mailcap on Windows WSL

2024-10-08 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
On 2024-10-08 08:26, Michael Kjörling wrote: > On 8 Oct 2024 08:55 +0200, from mutt-users@mutt.org (Jan Eden via Mutt-users): > > I need to use mutt within the WSL of MS Windows. To display HTML > > mails via mailcap, I created a small script which reads from STDIN, > > wr

mailcap on Windows WSL

2024-10-08 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Good morning, I need to use mutt within the WSL of MS Windows. To display HTML mails via mailcap, I created a small script which reads from STDIN, writes a temporary file and opens it with the Edge browser: # ~/.mutt/mailcap text/html; ~/.mutt/htmlviewer html # ~/.mutt/htmlviewer with open('/var

Re: Re: DKIM signature rejected

2025-02-21 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi Matthias, On 2025-02-21 13:28, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día jueves, febrero 20, 2025 a las 08:40:46a. m. -0800, > googly.negotiator...@aceecat.org escribió: > > > > I've got a reject of an email to a public PostgreSQL mailing list > > > due to an issue with my DKIM signature. Attached belo

Re: DKIM signature rejected

2025-02-20 Thread Jan Eden via Mutt-users
Hi Matthias, in most cases, the DKIM signature is applied by the mailserver, so mutt is not involved. The relationship between DKIM signatures and mailing lists is specified in RFC 6377[1], and it has always been rocky. That said, I was not aware that a signature could forbid an email being resen