e
fccs all over the place it's tough to remember to check for their
existence beforehand.
Anyone else find this problem?
Thanks
Chris
--
Chris Fuchs
"Random quotes can be most effecatious." -Anonymous
Hi,
How can I know for certain whether color is supported on
version 6.1 of exceed run on NT? I live on xterm sessions which
access a solaris box (Sunos 5.5.1) and color would be nice.
This works:
mono header bold Subject:
This doesn't:
color header red black Subject:
The above suggests my se
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 03:52:33PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> > How can I know for certain whether color is supported on
> > version 6.1 of exceed run on NT? I live on xterm sessions which
> > access a solaris box (Sunos 5.5.1) and color would be nice.
>
> This file contains lots of color w
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 06:12:24PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >
> > > > How can I know for certain whether color is supported on
> > > > version 6.1 of exceed run on NT? I live on xterm sessions which
> > > > access a solaris box (Sunos 5.5.1) and color would be nice.
> > >
> > > This file c
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:15:13AM -0700, Carl B . Constantine wrote:
> Is there anyway in mutt to randomize the signature? I might like to use
> a different sig for different replies which is easy enough to do using
> mutt/vim combo (del sig :r ~newsig) but how would I randomize between 4
> or 5
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 01:42:04PM -0500, Drew Raines wrote:
> * "Carl B . Constantine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > How can I tell mutt to mark email as read.
>
>
r works but n doesn't toggle the new flag for me.
Chris
--
The only joy in the world is to begin. -Cesare Pavese
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 11:35:59AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> Chris Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 07/11/2001:
> > #!/usr/local/bin/perl
> > #randsig.pl, by Don Blaheta. Released into public domain, blah, blah, blah.
> > # Generates
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 03:26:46PM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
*snip*
>
> Perl's printf is C's printf, and very fast. This is probably not
> a big deal to you, though. The real gain is that fact that you
> now can let Perl's printf Do The Right Thing, and not have to
> rely on a less tha
Hello,
I work in an MS environment and wonder if there is a document
of tips, hints, etc for mutt users having to send to either
MS exchange or outlook? I've looked in the archives without
much luck.
Some of the idiosyncracies are having to use "^\n\n$" instead of
"^\n$" for MS exchange to rea
Hello,
I currently get mail from a MUA that simply chops all lines beyond
80 characters to the nearest word. For unquoted text that's okay,
but for quoted lines you get something like this:
> extreme silliness that should not be dealt this way but is for
whatever reason.
> On t
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:06:37PM -0400, Sam Roberts wrote:
>Quoting Chris Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote:
>> I currently get mail from a MUA that simply chops all lines beyond
>> 80 characters to the nearest word. For unquoted text that's okay,
>
>
>On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:39:15PM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote:
>Thus spake Chris Fuchs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> Does anyone else get mail thus mutilated and how do you handle it?
>
>Use this in your .muttrc:
>
> set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72 com
>On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:00:09PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> Thanks, looks like I'll add vim to my mutt learning curve.
>
>Are you already using vim? No reason to start, just to get word wrap.
>par (under vi) handles this, and I'd be shocked -- shocked, I tell you
>-- if emacs does not.
Sho
on Wed,11 Jul 2001, Mr. Wade wrote:
> Anthony Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would just like to find out if its possible in mutt to setup so that
> > if you use a signature file, the signature is added to the top of the
> > email, rather than the bottom of the email below the persons origi
on Tue,17 Jul 2001, Mr. Wade wrote:
> Yeah,... only the first line of output from the
on Tue,17 Jul 2001, John Arundel wrote:
> On 2001-07-17 at 09:28:55, Chris Fuchs warbled:
> > Yes, I quite agree - unfortunately I have to deal and comply
> > with this format
>
> Why?
As a professional courtesy to some of the people I work and
deal with.
Chris
--
Be who
on Tue,17 Jul 2001, John Arundel wrote:
> For a moment I had a horrible vision of a company which dictated top-posting
> as a corporate email policy...
May as well be around here.
> RUN!!!
Just as soon as the job market allows ;-)
--
You lose it if you talk about it. -Ernest Hemingway
Hi,
I thought I saw something like this in the archive but can't seem to
find it now: keeping mail marked as new up to an arbitrary future
time/date? Ie, basically a refinement of setting mark_old=no.
If not, as I suspect, any plans for something like this?
Chris
--
You cannot mandate prod
on Tue,24 Jul 2001, Tom Foster wrote:
> I'd like a different sig and "from" line, depending on what
> folder I'm in when I reply or send.
See the following for setting up profiles:
http://www.acoustics.hut.fi/~mara/mutt/profiles.html
--
Whether you believe you can, or whether you believe yo
Hi,
The 'C' command in the index copies files to a mailbox and prompts
if it doesn't exist which isn't really the default behaviour I
prefer (would rather it copy to a file). The same command
in compose menu does copy to a file. So right now I pipe to
something like this: "tee filename > /dev/
on Wed,25 Jul 2001, David Ellement wrote:
> unset confirmcreate
> (unset confirmappend also)
Actually all I wanted to do was to save a message as a file
with a filename that I would get prompted for and not into
a directory. I'm using the MH style mailboxes.
Chris
--
An essential a
Hi,
I used to mixed text files amongst my email messages prior to
using mutt and still do so, although I wonder whether there is a
better way. Basically I use this as a means of storing notes and
other tidbits related to mail received around the same general time.
Obviously this is using mutt in
on Tue,31 Jul 2001, R. Leponce wrote:
> Sometimes I receive uuencoded attachement within the message body and mutt
> seems to be unable to decode it itself (begin ... end). And piping this
> message to the uudecode cmd line does not works (don't like email header
> ??).
>
> Any solution ??
Work
on Tue,31 Jul 2001, Dumas Patrice wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use procmail to filtrate my mails, but they are not correctly displayed. They
> are viewed concatenated by mutt in a single big mail.
This means the first 'From' line in your header is missing (ie From
without the colon) - in which case all y
on Thu,02 Aug 2001, David T-G wrote:
> I guess us mutt folks are just elitist bastards :-)
Nope just well trained mutts. Leave it up to others to soil
their own mailing lists.
> That's certainly the basis, though, and I think it's a good start. Now
> to find someone to implement it...
Let's
on Thu,02 Aug 2001, Chris Fuchs wrote:
> Nope just well trained mutts. Leave it up to others to soil
> their own mailing lists.
Opps soiled myself.
:-D
Sorry I couldn't resist.
:-D
--
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind
don't matter and those
on Thu,02 Aug 2001, David T-G wrote:
>I had long ago requested "prune" and "graft" functions to pull a
>subthread out of a thread, or to put a thread into another thread
>somewhere, but never got anything like it. With the 'e'dit-message
>function, it's easy enough to pull the top message in the
on Tue,07 Aug 2001, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
> Way cool, Thanks Cedric. I will check it out this week and provide
> feedback.
>
> Lou
>
> On 08/07/01 03:18 PM, Cedric Duval sat at the `puter and typed:
> > Hi Zack, David, Andre, Ken, Chris and Louis :-)
> >
> > Here is the patch to edit threads
on Tue,07 Aug 2001, Ricardo SIGNES wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> I'd like to set up a folder hook so that when entering a folder that looks
> like "=bar/foo", my From is set to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> While I know I can do this pretty easily with one folder hook per folder,
> I wonder if I can use r
on Wed,08 Aug 2001, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> To get these to work I had replace ~/.mutt etc with a full path to the
> file. ~ does not seem to work in mutt macros for me.
Does mutt use 'sh' when executing macros? It does for me even
though I have set the mutt 'shell' variable to bash in my mu
on Thu,09 Aug 2001, David T-G wrote:
> % I always thought that these mailbox files are just plane and simple
> % text files, that contain only the email, one after the other; and
>
> mbox-format files are just that; the status indicator you seek is
> X-Status: and if there isn't one mutt assumes
Hello,
I just replied to a message on this list and mutt saw fit to
add a space between the Re: and the rest of the subject line.
I've accidentally sent one of these messages out before and
have been meaning to fix it except I can't seem to find out
what controls this in the manual.
Thanks for
32 matches
Mail list logo
