Hi,

I used to mixed text files amongst my email messages prior to
using mutt and still do so, although I wonder whether there is a
better way.  Basically I use this as a means of storing notes and
other tidbits related to mail received around the same general time.
Obviously this is using mutt in a manner for which it wasn't
designed and there are arguments for and against it - which I
would like to solicit (being new to mutt and not familiar with
the relevant RFCs):

1) Right now I send myself a blank email.  This ends up in my spool
mailbox after which I edit it, leaving the header intact except for
the Subject:, and then save it in the appropriate mailbox/maildir; ie,
the From: and To: fields both have my address.  This works but is
ugly.  I would rather not have to bother the mail server.

2) An alternative, which I haven't yet gotten to work yet would be
to create a template text file with a header which has my address
in both the From: and To: fields and then get it into mutt by using
"cat textfile | procmail".  I could make a macro out of this - but
it is still butt ugly.  Right now when I save to something other
than the spool mailbox the resultant time displayed for the message
in the index menu is 'Jan 1'.

3) An extension to the 'alternates' configuration variable in which
'to_chars' would have another flag say 'M' which can stand for memo,
message, etc.  The flag turns on when mutt detects that the From: and
the To: field contain your address but all other fields are blank
(ie Cc:, Bcc:, Fcc: etc). In response mutt would go to a new
configuration variable which would contain a string that it would
display as the receipient - if not set it would just show the default
"To <address_in_from_field>".  Was this already considered when
'to_chars' was set up?  If so what's the background?

Adding this feature would require more than meets the eye - I'm not
up enough on mutt to know precisely what... has anyone's bloat
detector gone off yet?  Does anyone else do something like this?

Chris

--
   "To ask the hard question is simple. -W. H. Auden

Reply via email to