Re: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-03-15 Thread David Champion
* On 15 Mar 2011, Joseph wrote: > The addition in mailcap I just added in, but it makes no difference. > I know before it used to ask me if I want to view the signature but some how > it doesn't any more. What is the value of $pgp_verify_sig? What you describe sounds like it used to be ask-yes

Re: [OT] GPG signature fails

2011-03-15 Thread Aaron Toponce
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:31:42PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > If this verifies, I just figured it out. Still a bad signature here. I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that your signature is 159 bits, and not 160? -- . o . o . o . . o o . . . o . . . o . o o o . o . o

Re: [OT] GPG signature fails

2011-03-15 Thread Simon Ward
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 01:48:26PM +0100, Remco Rijnders wrote: > Possibly... but it consistently is with only Derek's emails. Your > signature validates fine for example. > > Using mutt and gpg as available in / from Debian Squeeze. It’s not just you as I am seeing it too, with both gpg and gpg2

Re: Is it possible to add a margin at the left side of pager?

2011-03-15 Thread Simon Ruderich
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 04:27:03PM +0800, Yue Wu wrote: > Hi, list, > > As the title, I feel too tight for eye when the left side of the pager > is at the most left of the fringe of a xterm window, is it possible to > add a margin between the left side of xterm window and pager? > > Regards, > Yue

Re: [OT] GPG signature fails

2011-03-15 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 07:28:21AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:31:42PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > > If this verifies, I just figured it out. > > Still a bad signature here. I wonder if it has anything to do with the > fact that your signature is 159 bits, and not 160

Re: sign plian text messages only

2011-03-15 Thread Simon Ruderich
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:15:32PM +0100, tim smy wrote: > I would like to set up mutt to sign plain text messages. please > advise if the lines below are relevant to be placed in the > muttrc and if some lines are missing please let me know. > > set pgp_clearsign_command="gpg --no-verbose --batch

Re: [OT] GPG signature fails

2011-03-15 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:25:47AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 07:28:21AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:31:42PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > > > If this verifies, I just figured it out. > > > > Still a bad signature here. I wonder if it has any

Re: getmail starts too many processes

2011-03-15 Thread Simon Ruderich
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 07:26:02PM +0800, chris M. sprite wrote: > I find that one that i start getmail to download mails, then > the getmail will starts too many process so that it will use > too many RAM. > > [snip] Hi, I've never encountered something similar. getmail is just one python proces

Re: [OT] GPG signature fails

2011-03-15 Thread Simon Ruderich
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:34:37AM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > Actually, do either of these last two messages (this one, and the one > I'm replying to) verify correctly? I upgraded OpenSSL, and now I see > this: > > $ gpg --list-packets foo4.txt > :signature packet: algo 17, keyid 1C49C048DFBEAD0

Re: [OT] GPG signature fails

2011-03-15 Thread David J. Weller-Fahy
* Derek Martin [2011-03-15 09:42 -0500]: > Actually, do either of these last two messages (this one, and the one > I'm replying to) verify correctly? I upgraded OpenSSL, and now I see > this: > > $ gpg --list-packets foo4.txt > :signature packet: algo 17, keyid 1C49C048DFBEAD02 > version

Re: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-03-15 Thread Joseph
On 03/15/11 08:11, David Champion wrote: * On 15 Mar 2011, Joseph wrote: The addition in mailcap I just added in, but it makes no difference. I know before it used to ask me if I want to view the signature but some how it doesn't any more. What is the value of $pgp_verify_sig? What you descr

Re: rsync removes the "N" from mailboxes with new mail

2011-03-15 Thread Nathan Stratton Treadway
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 07:13:33 -0700, Dan McDaniel wrote: > Just to point out that rsync v2.6.4 is pretty old. Current is 3.0.7. > Even my Debian Lenny system (Lenny was released two years ago) is > running 3.0.3. Perhaps there was a change in rsync's behavior since > 2.6.4. Version 3.0.7 does no

Re: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-03-15 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:09:15AM -0600, Joseph wrote: > I tried all combinations: > set crypt_verify_sig=ask-no > set crypt_verify_sig=ask-yes > set crypt_verify_sig=yes > > Makes no difference, I always get [-- application/pgp-signature is > unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --] Almost s

Re: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-03-15 Thread Joseph
On 03/15/11 16:21, Derek Martin wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:09:15AM -0600, Joseph wrote: I tried all combinations: set crypt_verify_sig=ask-no set crypt_verify_sig=ask-yes set crypt_verify_sig=yes Makes no difference, I always get [-- application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use 'v' to v