On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:31:42PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > If this verifies, I just figured it out.
Still a bad signature here. I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that your signature is 159 bits, and not 160? -- . o . o . o . . o o . . . o . . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
