* On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 Kyle Wheeler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> On Thursday, October 4 at 06:14 PM, quoth Joseph:
> >I am trying to access mail on a remote pop server and it seems like a
> >simple procedure:
> >type: c
> >pop://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> >
> >it should ask me for a password, instead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 5 at 08:06 AM, quoth M. Fioretti:
>Besides some MTA-level filtering, I am using bogo instead of
>spamassassin because of one simple reason: lack of maintenance.
>
>I've read several times that SA rules must be constantly updated and
Hi Everyone. Thank God for this list. I have been searching for a way to
import addresses from my alias
folder to Abook. I know there is a way to do it, but so far I have been unable
to find the solution. A
heads up will be most appreciated.
Rem
* On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 Rem P Roberti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> Hi Everyone. Thank God for this list. I have been searching for a
> way to import addresses from my alias folder to Abook. I know there
> is a way to do it, but so far I have been unable to find the solution.
> A heads up will
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 07:56:44 AM +0200, Christian Kuka ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> At the moment I'm using bogofilter, razor, pyzor, dcc, spamassassin
> and clamassassin and the following procmail rules:
This (cascading several filters, lightest to heaviest) is what inmy
other reply I said I'
I just posted a message that I can not access pop server on my provider
so some folks asked question if I have pop compiled IN. I did not. And
I quickly recompile mutt with "pop" and "mobx" support and when I tried
to start it I got:
Reading /home/joseph/.maildir/inbox...Segmentation fault
I wen
* Eyolf Østrem on Friday, October 05, 2007 at 01:07:39 +0200
a lilyponder ;)
> On 04.10.2007 (13:13), Gary Johnson wrote:
>> On 2007-10-04, David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> $ cat external-reply
>>> #!/bin/sh
>>> DRAFT="$1"
>>> # hard-link our own copy of the draft so that mutt ca
Hi,
* Joseph [07-10-04 20:20:20 -0600] wrote:
I rung mutt:
strace -ff -o mutt.trace mutt
If anybody know how to read this file I appreciate the help.
I've tried to attached the file 26Kb but the list complained it too big.
If nothing else helps it would be nice if you could put the file
so
* On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 Joseph ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> I just posted a message that I can not access pop server on my provider
> so some folks asked question if I have pop compiled IN. I did not. And
> I quickly recompile mutt with "pop" and "mobx" support and when I tried
> to start it I
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 14:25:43 PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> Have you got any documents describing the process of integrating
> bogofilter with mutt ?
I just used these:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6439
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7436
Another approach, valid also on Imap and
* On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 M. Fioretti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 14:25:43 PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> Another approach, valid also on Imap and compatible with webmail, is
> to just move all the spam missed by bogofilter in a predefined with a
> macro,
When imap is inv
On 05.10.2007 (02:08), Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Friday, October 5 at 08:06 AM, quoth M. Fioretti:
> >Besides some MTA-level filtering, I am using bogo instead of
> >spamassassin because of one simple reason: lack of maintenance.
> >
> >I've read several times that SA rules must be constantly updat
hi,
Eyolf ?strem wrote:
>I've been using bogofilter ever since I first installed KDE/Kmail and the
>potentially hassle-free configuration of SpamAssassin led to constant
>crashes. I belive it has been solved by now, and in any case Kmail is
>ancient history, but I was wondering what experiences t
* Eyolf Østrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-05 13:22]:
> On 05.10.2007 (02:08), Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> > The real criticism I'd level against SpamAssassin as compared to
> > bogofilter is that SpamAssassin's bayesian classifier is relatively
> > simple.
Yes. Also, SpamAssassin is terribly slow.
>
* M. Fioretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-05 08:19]:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 07:56:44 AM +0200, Christian Kuka ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > At the moment I'm using bogofilter, razor, pyzor, dcc, spamassassin
> > and clamassassin and the following procmail rules:
>
> This (cascading several fi
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 02:08:26 AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Bah; SpamAssassin is the swiss-army-knife of spam filters. It includes
> a bayesian filter (not to mention things like razor and dcc, which are
> constantly up-to-date), and as such, does not require updating the
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 14:48:09 PM +0200, Michal Vitecek ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> hi,
>
> Eyolf ?strem wrote:
> >I've been using bogofilter ever since I first installed KDE/Kmail and the
> >potentially hassle-free configuration of SpamAssassin led to constant
> >crashes. I belive it has been s
On 05.10.2007 (15:30), Holger Weiss wrote:
> * eyolf østrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-05 13:22]:
> > It's not that I'm dissatisfied with my current situation. My #1
> > concern is actually with false negatives; I've since long given up
> > browsing through the CapturedSpam folder to check for
* Christian Kuka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-05 07:56]:
> I also read from a scanner called "crm114" in the linux magazine that
> should be realy good, but never checked that.
I use OSBF-Lua[1] which is a port of CRM114. It's a Bayesian classifier
which uses a more sophisticated algorithm than B
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 11:09 +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> * On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 Joseph ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > I just posted a message that I can not access pop server on my provider
> > so some folks asked question if I have pop compiled IN. I did not. And
> > I quickly recompile mutt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 5 at 01:22 PM, quoth Eyolf Østrem:
> So this does in fact mean that without that extra time tending the
> rules, SA may actually let more spam through?
As in most cases, the answer is "it depends". It *may* let more spam
through
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 5 at 04:02 PM, quoth M. Fioretti:
> 0) Do I have a flat rate fast connection, where I wouldn't notice SA
> contactly doing network checks?
Indeed! Not all solutions are perfect for all situations.
> 1) after the whole message ha
On 2007-10-05, Christian Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Eyolf Østrem on Friday, October 05, 2007 at 01:07:39 +0200
>
> a lilyponder ;)
>
> > On 04.10.2007 (13:13), Gary Johnson wrote:
> >> On 2007-10-04, David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> $ cat external-reply
> >>> #!/bin
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-05 09:38]:
> I will say, though, it is true that SpamAssassin is really slow, but
> not for the reason many people claim.
My claim is that spamd requires an order of magnitude more CPU and
memory ressources than Bogofilter and others do. Of course, that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 5 at 07:58 AM, quoth Joseph:
>So it seems the problem was caused by the statement header_cache
>below
>
>I had in muttrc:
>set header_cache="~/.mutt_headercache/"
>
>Is the header cache build into mutt or do I need to activate it w
* Gary Johnson on Friday, October 05, 2007 at 07:40:03 -0700
> On 2007-10-05, Christian Ebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The following works in a dirty way -- you are prompted for
>> address and subject both in the old and new instances of Mutt,
>> but this should be solvable by macro. I made it
On 2007.10.05 09:15:19 +, Michael Tatge wrote:
> * On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 Rem P Roberti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > Hi Everyone. Thank God for this list. I have been searching for a
> > way to import addresses from my alias folder to Abook. I know there
> > is a way to do it, but so far
Hi,
here's an interesting hack I'd like to share (thanks to Rado for the
initial prototype):
When I'm using a in the index, I always try to hit 'q' to get
back to the index view, but of course there's nothing to quit. The
macro below changes l such that 'q' will unlimit, and a subsequent 'q'
wil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 5 at 05:14 PM, quoth Holger Weiss:
>> As for impact, it chunks through on the order of 5000 emails a day,
>> of which over 86% is spam (according to my logs), and I think the
>> last time I got a message that was incorrectly class
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 05:46:30PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> When I'm using a in the index, I always try to hit 'q' to get
> back to the index view, but of course there's nothing to quit. The
> macro below changes l such that 'q' will unlimit, and a subsequent 'q'
> will then quit mutt:
>
>
Where does mutt get the address for a mailing list reply?
I've just been chided for replying twice to a mailing list, where
I used the list-reply function.
Replies went to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and to
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' - and I can't see where the mail. part
comes from. Is it from the List-Id hea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 5 at 10:03 AM, quoth Breen Mullins:
> Where does mutt get the address for a mailing list reply?
>
> I've just been chided for replying twice to a mailing list, where
> I used the list-reply function.
Heh. That may actually be the f
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 09:47:26 AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Friday, October 5 at 04:02 PM, quoth M. Fioretti:
> > 0) Do I have a flat rate fast connection, where I wouldn't notice SA
> > contactly doing network checks?
>
> Indeed! Not all solutions are perfect for all
I have "set ispell="/usr/local/bin/ispell"" appended to my .muttrc file, and
"map : !ispell %: e
%" appended to my .exrc file. But I am unable to get ispell to play. Is
this set up incorrect?
Rem
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-05 12:44 -0500]:
How are you specifying in your muttrc that you're subscribed to that
list? If you're doing it like this:
subscribe listname@
Then you may be being too general (that subscribe line matches both
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PRO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 5 at 11:42 AM, quoth Breen Mullins:
> After more digging, I understand a bit more about what's going on.
>
> ChangeLog:
> 2004-07-20 08:17:21 Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (roessler)
>
> * imap/message.c, mutt.h, p
* On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 Rem P Roberti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
>
> I have "set ispell="/usr/local/bin/ispell"" appended to my .muttrc file
So hit "i" in the compose menu to run $ispell.
As of lately I use vim's built-in spellchecker which is quite neat IMO.
HTH,
Michael
--
BOFH excuse #356
On 2007.10.05 21:55:32 +, Michael Tatge wrote:
> * On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 Rem P Roberti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> >
> > I have "set ispell="/usr/local/bin/ispell"" appended to my .muttrc file
>
> So hit "i" in the compose menu to run $ispell.
> As of lately I use vim's built-in spellcheck
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-05 14:10 -0500]:
So, have you tried making it this:
subscribe '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
That way the only address that is recognized as a list is the one the
list specifies in the List-Post header. Unless something else is going
on, that should prev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 5 at 01:15 PM, quoth Rem P Roberti:
>On 2007.10.05 21:55:32 +, Michael Tatge wrote:
>> * On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 Rem P Roberti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
>> >
>> > I have "set ispell="/usr/local/bin/ispell"" appended to my .mut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 5 at 01:10 PM, quoth Breen Mullins:
>> So, have you tried making it this:
>>
>> subscribe '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>>
>> That way the only address that is recognized as a list is the one the list
>> specifies in the List-Post header
On 2007.10.05 16:15:42 +, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday, October 5 at 01:15 PM, quoth Rem P Roberti:
> >On 2007.10.05 21:55:32 +, Michael Tatge wrote:
> >> * On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 Rem P Roberti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> >> >
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 5 at 02:43 PM, quoth Rem P Roberti:
> On 2007.10.05 16:15:42 +, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>> On Friday, October 5 at 01:15 PM, quoth Rem P Roberti:
>>> On 2007.10.05 21:55:32 +, Michael Tatge wrote:
* On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 Re
> > Believe it or not, I actually do know where the "i" key is, but what
> > I couldn't figure out was how to use it.
>
> I know; I was having fun at your expense. I suppose humor doesn't
> translate well in email, even with smileys. Sorry, I didn't mean to
> offend.
>
> > What I expected t
Rem P Roberti wrote:
> What I expected to be able to do was to invoke the spell checker
> directly from within vi, which is no doubt possible, but which so
> far eludes me.
If your vi is vim >= 7, then you can use the built-in spellchecker in
vim. To do this, you type :set spell while in normal m
On 2007-10-05, Rem P Roberti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, ispell works well enough (although I have heard that aspell
> is better), but you have motivated me to look into vim. I have
> become rather attached to vi, and have taken some pains to
> learn to use it. Unfortunately, there is now
Is it possible to show in index display which email has an attachment?
I was looking for a solution but it seems to me I need to install a
patch in order to show this information in index_format.
This page indicate I would need this patch in order to show this
information:
http://home.uchicago.e
47 matches
Mail list logo
