* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-05 12:44 -0500]:
How are you specifying in your muttrc that you're subscribed to that
list? If you're doing it like this:
subscribe listname@
Then you may be being too general (that subscribe line matches both
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED], so if mutt sees
both of those available in your message, it will reply to both of
them). Try this:
subscribe '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
That way only the one address matches, so it'll only be sent to the
one that matched.
After more digging, I understand a bit more about what's going on.
ChangeLog:
2004-07-20 08:17:21 Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(roessler)
* imap/message.c, mutt.h, parse.c, send.c, url.c: Use List-Post
headers when doing list-reply.
And indeed, there's a List-Post header present that specifies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've changed my .muttrc as you suggested, to delimit the subscribed
address properly.
But the list-reply still picks up both versions of the list address
when I try to reply. (The 'normal' one is in the address used by the
person I was replying to.) There are no followup headers in the message.
This looks like a bug: mutt usually gives us the flexibility to work
around eccentric configurations by a listowner, but it doesn't seem to
work here.
Comments?
Breen
--
Breen Mullins
Menlo Park, California
