I've started using Sven Gluckes configuration files, and mutt seems to
crash much more frequently (enough to make it unusable). I get:
---
Detected an attempt to write across stack boundry
Terminating /usr/bin/mutt
"libsafe violation for /usr/bin/mutt, pid=1981; overflow caused by
memcopy()"
N
* Ricardo SIGNES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-19 20:46 -0400]:
[...]
> I can't find a way to force not to move, nor can I find a way to
> get "back to where I was," taking into account the move that may result from
> .
>
> Is there a solution other than hacking the source?
Yes.
>From the fine m
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020920 02:07]:
> ">_" is the de-facto standard. period.
> making this an option was a bad idea.
Note the space after the > (i e >_) which makes things a lot easyier to
read than just > (which I also consider broken)
> Sven [using sed as the display_filter
>
I am currently using mutt 1.5.1 and the S/MIME functions have proved to
work without problems. But today I received an encrypted and signed
S/MIME message which could not be neither verified nor decrypted by mutt
(openssl). Here are the significant headers from two different mails,
the first mail
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 10:20:18AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Ricardo SIGNES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-19 20:46 -0400]:
> [...]
> > I can't find a way to force not to move, nor can I find a way
> > to get "back to where I was," taking into account the move that may result
> > from .
>
* Timo T. Rajala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One difference is that the "smime-type=enveloped-data;" row is missing
> from the MS mail. I inserted this row in the MS mail and opened the
> mail in mutt: now both signature check and decrypt works.
>
> My question is: Is the MS MUA not following t
Hi, all.
Could some friendly soul describe the differens between these two
settings ($mail_check and $timeout)? I've read the manual but I still
don't quite understand. Does one overwrite the other one? Is there a
reason why I wouldn't want these to be set equalent?
Regards, Johan Svedberg
Hi, all.
Could some friendly soul describe the differens between these two
settings ($mail_check and $timeout)? I've read the manual but I still
don't quite understand. Does one overwrite the other one? Is there a
reason why I wouldn't want these to be set equalent?
Regards, Johan Svedberg
Cedric Duval [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> 'a' attaches a file, not a message (of course, the message can be in one
> file like with the mbox format - but not with maildir).
>
> There is a more appropriate function for what you want to do:
> ('A').
Right, I didn't know about the attach-message c
You are right. If you look at smime.c you will see that Mutt desperatly
needs either smime-type or (to satisfy Netscape 4.x mailers) a
Content-Description.
As s/mime is in development, we all have to wait or find some
workarounds for it. See my mail from 18-09-02 for my current solution.
I'm sur
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020920 02:07]:
> ">_" is the de-facto standard. period.
> making this an option was a bad idea.
* Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 09:18]:
> Note the space after the > (i.e. >_) which makes things a lot
> easier to read than just > (which I also c
* MindFuq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 07:27]:
> I've started using Sven Guckes configuration files, and mutt seems
> to crash much more frequently (enough to make it unusable). [..]
> It looks like I'll have to dump his config files..
well, i have been using mutt 1.4 for quite a while -
but n
* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 11:33]:
> Could some friendly soul describe the differens
> between these two settings ($mail_check and $timeout)?
the timeout counts down after your last key press.
mail_check works continuously.
> I've read the manual but I still don't quite und
How do I upgrade mutt? I tried using rpm with the upgrade option, and
it had a dependancy on libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2). Then when I tried to
upgrade GLIBC, I got several screenfulls of other programs that require
the old version that I'm using. I got the feeling I would have scrap
everything and
I can't seem to get set pop_checkinterval=60 to work. Is mutt suppose to
get the new messages or just check for them. In any case I am not notified
by mutt of any new messages available ever. I prefer to use mutt to
check mail as I only have one pop account and its much simpler to use
mutt instead
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002, Markus Garschall wrote:
> Since I'm using Netscape beside Mutt as Mailer, I wanted to know whether
> the old way to quote things in an E-Mail is the only correct one.
>
> e.g.:
> > foo
> > foo
>
> In the default-install Netscape does following:
>
> | bar
> | bar
Actually,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 01:23:15PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote:
> Could some friendly soul describe the differens between these two
> settings ($mail_check and $timeout)? I've read the manual but I still
> don't quite understand. Does one overwrite the other one? Is there a
> reason why I wouldn'
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 16:40 +0200]:
> * Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 09:18]:
> > > Sven [using sed as the display_filter
> > >to correct incorrect quoting]
> >
> > Care to share?
>
> guckes.net/setup - as usual.
I don't see anything in there tha
- On Fri, 20.Sep.2002, 11:42EDT, MindFuq uttered:
> How do I upgrade mutt? I tried using rpm with the upgrade option, and
> it had a dependancy on libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2). Then when I tried to
> upgrade GLIBC, I got several screenfulls of other programs that require
> the old version that I'm
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 12:11:27PM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> * Alex Polite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-17 08:22]:
> > How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list? What I
> > usually do now is push "L" for list-reply the remove the body and
> > appropriate headers.
>
> I h
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:59:32AM -0400, Ken Weingold wrote:
> Actually, send a mail from Netscape Mail to mutt and you might find
> that those '|'s are actually '> 's. I saw this on some mailer, maybe
> Apple Mail. Really confusing, but that was the case.
Now I found out what confused me. I o
Hello Mutt Users,
what can I do in order to display all (and complete) threads which are
initiated by myself && which are containing messages from me.
I thought about the limit(l)-feature (e.g. l ~L my@email), but I didn't
succeed... :-(
--
Best regards
Heiko
Hi,
I have some trouble here getting Mutt to recognize non
ASCII characters. Displaying them works wonderfully, other
console programs work fine, too (bash, vi, mc, irssi, ...).
The facts:
Environment:
* FreeBSD 4-stable *
LANG=de_DE.ISO8859-1
LC_* unset
Mutt:
* Mut
* On 2002.09.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Heiko Heil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Mutt Users,
>
> what can I do in order to display all (and complete) threads which are
> initiated by myself && which are containing messages from me.
I'm not sure how to add in the second part of th
* MindFuq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-20 15:43]:
> How do I upgrade mutt?
http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/install.php3
> I tried using rpm with the upgrade option, and
> it had a dependancy on libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2).
> Then when I tried to upgrade GLIBC,
> I got several screenfulls of o
25 matches
Mail list logo
