Hi,
* Christoph Bugel [02-06-12 11:23:05 +0200] wrote:
> On 2002-06-11, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> > * Christoph Bugel [02-06-11 22:21:30 +0200] wrote:
[ wrong In-Reply-To from mutt 1.2.5.x ]
> > The problem is that mutt cannot reliably distinct between a
> > message-id and a mail adress if both are g
On 2002-06-12, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> * Christoph Bugel [02-06-12 11:23:05 +0200] wrote:
> > On 2002-06-11, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> > > * Christoph Bugel [02-06-11 22:21:30 +0200] wrote:
[...]
> > still, I thought that *anything* after the In-Reply-To: is
> > supposed to be a message-id?
[...]
> It dep
* Christoph Bugel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-12]:
>
>
> > And the difference between In-Reply-To and References is
> > also trivial for the case that you reply to multiple
> > messages at once: it can't be handled within References
>
> hmm, I never understood the concept of replying to multip
Since I'm on this list and using mutt it's obviously a safe assumption
that MS products are not my first choice in software. However, many of
my friends use these products, in particular Outlook Express.
Recently I started GPG signing most of my emails, and have found that
the recipients usin
Kevin --
...and then Kevin Coyner said...
%
% Since I'm on this list and using mutt it's obviously a safe assumption
I know what you mean.
% that MS products are not my first choice in software. However, many of
% my friends use these products, in particular Outlook Express.
Friends don't
>
> % that MS products are not my first choice in software. However, many of
> % my friends use these products, in particular Outlook Express.
>
> Friends don't let friends use Outlook :-)
>
LOL !
>
> %
> % Recently I started GPG signing most of my emails, and have found that
> % the re
Kevin --
...and then Kevin Coyner said...
%
% > % that MS products are not my first choice in software. However, many of
% > % my friends use these products, in particular Outlook Express.
% >
% > Friends don't let friends use Outlook :-)
%
% LOL !
*grin*
%
...
% > % the recipients usi
* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-11 23:16]:
> I was just wondering if it's possible to have "two word" aliases?
> Like alias foo bar John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
let's assume mutt allowed two-word-aliases.
let's look at the following alias command:
alias Johan Svedberg Johan Sved
I'd like to transition to a setup where most incoming mail gets procmailed
into three folders: archive-, archive, and either INBOX or whatever
other mailbox the procmail rules determine.
That part i can take care of myself. But, as usual, there's the spam
problem. When i go into my inbox and see
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:52:34AM -0400, Mike Schiraldi wrote:
> I'd like to transition to a setup where most incoming mail gets procmailed
> into three folders: archive-, archive, and either INBOX or whatever
> other mailbox the procmail rules determine.
>
> That part i can take care of myself.
Mutters,
In my muttrc I have the following macro:
# Add a macro to prepend a default directory
macro attach s ~/public_html/
So obviously, I want to download my attachments from a web
browser. The problem is that my umask isn't lenient enough, and the
attachments end up with 060
Mike --
...and then Mike Arrison said...
%
% Mutters,
% In my muttrc I have the following macro:
%
% # Add a macro to prepend a default directory
% macro attach s ~/public_html/
Right.
%
% So obviously, I want to download my attachments from a web
% browser. The problem is
> spamassassin (http://spamassassin.org/) works well for me and it is
> set up for use w/ procmail. you add a recipe to run spamassassin.
> spamassassin tags it and then you can do whatever you want with the
> spam with another recipe.
Yeah, spamassassin is very cool, but unfortunately it's not
Mike --
...and then Mike Schiraldi said...
%
% I'd like to transition to a setup where most incoming mail gets procmailed
% into three folders: archive-, archive, and either INBOX or whatever
% other mailbox the procmail rules determine.
Wow. That sounds like a big pain, IMHO. What's the purp
Hi,
* Christoph Bugel [02-06-12 16:34:28 +0200] wrote:
> So I guess the conclusion is:
> mutt-1.2.5 users break threading for everyone else on a mailing
> list! They should stop doing so immediately!
No. Because it's mutt we're talking about:
,[ ~/docs/software/mutt/manual-1.2.5.1.txt ]-
> What's the purpose of having two archives
I should clarify that when i say "archive-" i really mean
"archive-". So it's not like i'd have thousands of archive
folders. Just 12 per year.
The reason i want two is because sometimes i'll know approximately when a
message came in, and so i can go s
Another observation. 1.4 seems to do a MUCH better job of check mail
folders and setting new ("N") flags than was 1.2.5. As I've got both
installed on this machine, I'd doing some side by side comparisons.
Seems to be a lot of nice fine tuning in 1.4.
I am using mutt to access a IMAP account, and I have sort by date.
However, it sorts it by the date of sender, and not the date on which
it was received. In other words, if a user has the wrong time or date
on their machine, it will get reflected in my mailbox when mutt sorts
it. Other IMAP clie
You want to sort by (r)ecv (that is, date RECeiVed),
rather than sort by (d)ate, which sorts by the Date: header.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:46:07AM -0400, Lane Brooks wrote:
> I am using mutt to access a IMAP account, and I have sort by date.
> However, it sorts it by the date of sender, and not
> Is there a way to have mutt sort it by the date received instead of
> the date sender marks it with?
Sure is:
Sort (d)ate/(f)rm/(r)ecv/(s)ubj/t(o)/(t)hread/(u)nsort/si(z)e/s(c)ore?:
^^
--
Mike Schiraldi
VeriSign Applied Research
msg28925/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:46:07AM -0400, Lane Brooks wrote:
> I am using mutt to access a IMAP account, and I have sort by date.
> However, it sorts it by the date of sender, and not the date on which
> it was received. In other words, if a user has the wrong time or date
> on their machine, it
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:11:40AM -0700, Peter Gelbman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:46:07AM -0400, Lane Brooks wrote:
> > I am using mutt to access a IMAP account, and I have sort by date.
> > However, it sorts it by the date of sender, and not the date on which
> > it was received. In ot
* On 2002.06.12, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Mike Schiraldi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That part i can take care of myself. But, as usual, there's the spam
> problem. When i go into my inbox and see eighteen pieces of spam, i'd like
> to tag them all, run a macro, and have those message
> You might try saving them to a trash folder whne you delete them, and
> running an asynchronous daemon that periodically captures message-ids
> from the trash folder, prunes them from other folders, and removes them
> from trash. But that's not a quick hack.
That actually gives me a terrific id
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 07:16:14PM -0600, Dave Price wrote:
> ok,
>
> I finally got it working right. I am using mutt and
> lynx Version 2.8.1rel.2
>
> In ~/.muttrc I put:
>
> auto_view text/html text/enriched
>
> and I made a ~/.mailcap with:
>
> text/html;/usr/bin/lynx -dump -force_html
For reasons that you really don't want to know, I need to patch and compile
mutt on Cygwin. Unfortunately, I can't compile either the Cygwin sources of
1.2.5 nor mutt 1.4.0 with a stock
./configure --with-homespool=/foo/var
make
it freaks out (1.4) with
gcc -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/local/share/mutt\
Gerhard --
...and then Gerhard Haering said...
%
% For reasons that you really don't want to know, I need to patch and compile
Are you *really* sure you need to?
...
% I'd prefer to have a mutt 1.4, anyway. Has anybody compiled this sucessfully on
% Cygwin, yet?
You should ask on the cygwin
Tim Freedom wrote:
>
[snip snip]
>
> Once I invoke mutt and view my sample mbox with utf-8 characters in it
> (which a friend is able to see without a problem on FreeBSD) I see some
> correct glyphs and lots of octals,
>
> \207
>
> \206\203
>
> so in all, there are a few correct glyphs but
Hello Christoph,
On Wednesday, June 12, 2002 at 2:08:17 PM +0300, Christoph Bugel wrote:
> mutt-1.2.5 users break threading for everyone else on a mailing list!
> They should stop doing so immediately!
Calm down! ;-) Situation is not *so* critical:
First: many readers use more "Refere
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-12 14:59 -0500]:
> ...and then Gerhard Haering said...
> > For reasons that you really don't want to know, I need to patch and
> > compile
>
> Are you *really* sure you need to?
Yes, because
1) I can recompile mutt, but I can't recompile M$ Exchange or LA
Hello.
On Wed 2002-06-12 at 10:37:21 -0400, Mike Schiraldi wrote:
[...]
> I think what i'll do is filter probable spam as if it were just regular mail
> and write a script that i can call on each piece of spam. The script will
> count the number of bytes in the message (call it N) and then look t
Gerhard --
...and then Gerhard H?ring said...
%
% * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-12 14:59 -0500]:
% > ...and then Gerhard Haering said...
% > > For reasons that you really don't want to know, I need to patch and
% > > compile
% >
% > Are you *really* sure you need to?
%
% Yes, becaus
Tim --
...and then Tim Freedom said...
%
% Tim Freedom wrote:
% >
...
% I was able to resolve my own problem (thanks to the few people that
% replied and helped). It related to setting a correct locale value.
Oh, locale... Right. I just got bitten by that with the GNU fileutils.
What a pain
Tim --
...and then Tim Freedom said...
%
% Tim Freedom wrote:
% >
...
% >
% > Once I invoke mutt and view my sample mbox with utf-8 characters in it
% > (which a friend is able to see without a problem on FreeBSD) I see some
% > correct glyphs and lots of octals,
% >
% > \207
% >
% > \206
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:29:16AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % have to wait for packagers, etc. I do that regularly on Linux and
> % FreeBSD, so I thought (silly me) that it would compile OOTB on Cygwin,
> % too.
>
> And theoretically it should. The cygwin list should have some pointers
> (or ma
Gerhard,
Gerhard Haering wrote:
> For reasons that you really don't want to know, I need to
> patch and compile
> mutt on Cygwin. Unfortunately, I can't compile either the
> Cygwin sources of
> 1.2.5 nor mutt 1.4.0 with a stock
>
> ./configure --with-homespool=/foo/var
> make
>
> it freaks out
Hi,
after i received new messages I start mutt and open my mbox (per
default) ... typing command c I can change to the folder view or to a
list of my mailboxes specified in my .muttrc file ... o.k., in folder
view with folder_format default settings I get the N flag for mailboxes
that have new me
* Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-13 06:48]:
> after i received new messages I start mutt and open my mbox (per
> default) ... typing command c I can change to the folder view or
> to a list of my mailboxes specified in my .muttrc file ... o.k.,
> in folder view with folder_format defaul
38 matches
Mail list logo
