On Tue, Apr 23, 2002, Alain Bench wrote:
> Hello Sven,
>
> On Sunday, April 21, 2002 at 5:37:05 AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
>
> > telnet.exe sucks. use putty.exe. nuff said.
>
> Thanks for the advice, Sven! It solved a half of my problem: I now
> get nice charset and nice thread tree. You
Am 24.04.2002 um 04:34:38 -0400 schrieb Ken Weingold folgendes:
> If you like putty and want a REALLY nice ssh client, check out
> SecureCRT from VanDyke. www.vandyke.com . For Windows I really
> couldn't ask for more, and VanDyke is a perfect example of how a
> company should be run.
What abo
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Am 24.04.2002 um 04:34:38 -0400 schrieb Ken Weingold folgendes:
>
> > If you like putty and want a REALLY nice ssh client, check out
> > SecureCRT from VanDyke. www.vandyke.com . For Windows I really
> > couldn't ask for more, and VanDyke is a per
if i have ignore_list_reply_to set, shouldn't mutt honor a
mail-followup-to header?
take the following example:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Will Yardley)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Luser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Admin List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Luser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ken Weingold wrote:
> You get what you pay for. Putty sucks ass compared to SecureCRT.
> Putty vs. SecureCRT in functionality is like vi vs. vim, csh vs. tcsh,
> sh vs. bash, etc. Both will do the job, but
well sh and vi are sometimes better for a task than their "improved"
counterparts (l
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Ken Weingold wrote:
> If you like putty and want a REALLY nice ssh client, check out
> SecureCRT from VanDyke. www.vandyke.com . For Windows I really
> couldn't ask for more, and VanDyke is a perfect example of how a
> company should be run.
I tested it a few months ago (t
is there any way to have the line editor keep some sort of history /
cache? (the editor you use when typing addresses, executing shell
commands or what not)?
i know most people probably never leave mutt or just open subshells, but
i do occasionally exit mutt, and it would be really cool if you c
* JimO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-23 19:43]:
> I don't find a specification for Mutt's threading
> algorithm in the docs I have, manual and faq.
which manual explains algorithms, anyway? ;-)
> Maybe it's a moving target, but I bet it's pretty
> stable at this point. As I understand it, Mutt
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> I have many different e-mail addresses on my machine, all of which get
> read at a single account.
> When I reply to the list I have to manually type in the address that
> the mail was sent to. My MTA puts a header at the top with the
> delivery ad
* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-22 14:23]:
> I want to send (say from a script),
> the same way i may send like this:
> mutt whoever -ssubject
> But with the -H and a draft that contains
> all the header info and a complete body,
> it always prompts me.
>
> Can I avoid the prompt?
The
* Nik Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-22 15:55]:
> What kind of folder hooks are you using for Mailinglists.
folder-hook MUTT "set display_filter=$HOME/.mutt/netways.sed"
> I think of something like:
> Show initally only unread (limit ~U) but if there is..
mutt's config files do not have "
* Nik Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-22 15:57]:
> How can i set X-Headers of this type :
it's just as easy as this:
hope this helps
Sven
Sorry to continue this off-topic thread, but Volker Kuhlmann pointed
out a bug and some things to improve in the script I sent out, so I'm
sending out a new version for the record (i.e. people searching the
list archives with Google).
> :0
> md5sum=| perl -e 'while (($_ = <>) && !/^\r?\n$/) { if
Hi everybody,
i want ldbd-fetchaddr to collect email addresses from outgoung
email. Therefore I
set sendmail="tee >(lbdb-fetchaddr -a)|/usr/lib/sendmail -oem -oi"
in muttrc. But when I send mail, there is an exec error 127.
On the command line
cat email | tee >(lbdb-fetchaddr -a)|/usr/lib/send
Patrick --
First, you shouldn't just reply to any old email and start a new thread.
That is a Very Bad Thing and will get you heartily flamed. You've been
warned :-)
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% Can mutt copy the contents of one header to another one? I have man
Will --
...and then Will Yardley said...
%
...
% am i missing something here?
I don't know about this part; good luck.
%
% also, is there any way to manually set a m-f-t header to the list, even
% if you're ccing someone on the message itself? i'm pretty sure there
% isn't, but just asking.
Will --
...and then Will Yardley said...
%
% is there any way to have the line editor keep some sort of history /
% cache? (the editor you use when typing addresses, executing shell
% commands or what not)?
Hmmm... Yeah, if we're talking about the same thing; just hit the colon
and then hit y
Gregor --
...and then Gregor Zattler said...
%
% Hi everybody,
Hello!
%
...
% set sendmail="tee >(lbdb-fetchaddr -a)|/usr/lib/sendmail -oem -oi"
% in muttrc. But when I send mail, there is an exec error 127.
%
% On the command line
% cat email | tee >(lbdb-fetchaddr -a)|/usr/lib/sendmail -
> This is a permanent URL. The site will move soon.
Which is it?
--
Mike Schiraldi
VeriSign Applied Research
msg27590/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> The history will only save mutt commands and not anything you do in your
> shell
I don't think that's what he's saying. Some programs (like PostgreSQL's psql
tool) remember their history across invocations. The request (and i think
it's a great one) is for mutt to do the same.
--
Mike Schira
Mike, et al --
...and then Mike Schiraldi said...
%
% > This is a permanent URL. The site will move soon.
%
% Which is it?
It could be both if it has a nice go.to or PURL redirector. He probably
means that you should remember the URL provided and not the URL where you
end up.
%
%
% --
%
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:23:43PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > I want to take that delivery address and put it into the From: header
> > automatically without having to type each one in by hand.
>
> set alternates (see manual)
> set envelope_from
> set reverse_name
This message is both a tes
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 07:40:01AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % I want to take that delivery address and put it into the From: header
> % automatically without having to type each one in by hand.
>
> ... what you really want is to set your $alternates variable to recognize
> any addresses you may
I am amazed that this list gets absolutely no spam.
How is this accomplished?
Perhaps some tricks cam be passed on to zsh-users,
which isn't nearly as air-tight when it comes to
spam-infestation.
--
// [EMAIL PROTECTED] //
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:16:52PM -0400, Russell Hoover wrote:
> I am amazed that this list gets absolutely no spam.
> How is this accomplished?
> Perhaps some tricks cam be passed on to zsh-users,
> which isn't nearly as air-tight when it comes to
> spam-infestation.
Because it only allows peo
Patrick --
...and then Patrick Draper said...
%
% On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 07:40:01AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > % I want to take that delivery address and put it into the From: header
% > % automatically without having to type each one in by hand.
% >
% > ... what you really want is to set you
> I am amazed that this list gets absolutely no spam.
> How is this accomplished?
Maybe its magic ;) Actually even on lists that have a higher spam level
I still don't get them, I run spamassassin+razor to make sure that spam
lands in its own folder before procmail processes any other rules.
Wo
* On 2002.04.22, in <20020423004208.GA10973@bernard>,
* "Bernard Massot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I managed to do it, with this ugly hack :
> ...
> but I feel it's not the best solution ;)
Did you try my patch? It should make it pretty easy.
set attribution="if [ %[%w] = 1 ]; then e
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:37:01AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> I can say from experience that you can even set it to "pdrap.org" and be
> done with it. That would work for me except for where my wife and I get
Thanks, setting it to pdrap.org also seems to work well.
But, I still have a puzzling
Patrick --
...and then Patrick Draper said...
%
% On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:37:01AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > I can say from experience that you can even set it to "pdrap.org" and be
% > done with it. That would work for me except for where my wife and I get
%
% Thanks, setting it to pdrap.
* Russell Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-24 16:17]:
> I am amazed that this list gets absolutely no spam.
> How is this accomplished?
mutt-dev and mutt-users are closed lists.
mails from non-subscribers need
to be approved by moderators.
> Perhaps some tricks cam be passed on to zsh-users,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-24 02:54]:
> Can mutt copy the contents of one header to another one?
"Can mutt change the contents of messages? No."
> I have many different e-mail addresses on my machine, all of
> which get read at a single account. Some of those addresses
> a
* Paul Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-19 12:20]:
> On Friday, Apr 19, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > X-Mailer: ZipLip Sonoma v3.2
> >
> > great - yet another broken mailer
> > which gets added to my killfile.
>
> Isn't ziplip webmail? Not saying that
> it
* Johannes Berth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-19 17:43]:
> Btw, am I right that there is no possibility to score by mailer
> with the score function since ~h is not allowed? So is there any
> other way to score (not only kill) by mailer? I searched in the
> mailing list archive and asked google,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
> perhaps you could explain what functionality is missing in Putty that
> SecureCRT has? for certain functions, SecureCRT is a lot better, but for
> many users, Putty is easier to use and provides the desired
SecureCRT is just a lot more robust in pretty
Hello,
how can I tell mutt to keep the sent mails?
When the mail is sent, it is gone - for ever:(
Unfortunately I can't see what I sent to somebody
sometime ago.
Can you help me?
Thanks
Peter
--
Der Mensch kommt nie aus Vernunft zur Vernunft.
[
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:08:18PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> * On 2002.04.22, in <20020423004208.GA10973@bernard>,
> * "Bernard Massot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I managed to do it, with this ugly hack :
> > ...
> > but I feel it's not the best solution ;)
>
> Did you try my pa
Peter Hennicke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> how can I tell mutt to keep the sent mails?
> When the mail is sent, it is gone - for ever:(
> Unfortunately I can't see what I sent to somebody
> sometime ago.
set record=+sent-mail
This will put every mail you send out in $folder/sent-mail.
Look f
This seems to work for me in my .muttrc file.
fcc-hook . ~/Mail/sent-mail
Joel
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:08:57PM +0200, Peter Hennicke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> how can I tell mutt to keep the sent mails?
> When the mail is sent, it is gone - for ever:(
> Unfortunately I can't see what I sent to some
Hi,
* Peter Hennicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-24 23:08]:
>how can I tell mutt to keep the sent mails?
Set the $record variable in your mutt.rc.
Thorsten
--
In dem Augenblick, wo wir anfangen unsere Freiheitsrechte
einzuschränken, besorgen wir das Geschäft der Terroristen.
- Günter Gra
* On 2002.04.24, in <20020424212120.GA7108@bernard>,
* "Bernard Massot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > set attribution="if [ %[%w] = 1 ]; then echo -n \"D'al %%d, %%n en deus
>skrivet:%%\"; else echo -n \"D'ar %%d, %%n en deus skrivet:%%\"; fi |"
> >
> It works, thank you !
> But I want it
* Peter Hennicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-24 21:03]:
> how can I tell mutt to keep the sent mails?
> When the mail is sent, it is gone - for ever:(
set copy
> Unfortunately I can't see what
> I sent to somebody sometime ago.
> Can you help me?
RTFM!
Sven
--
http://www.math.fu-berlin.de
On Thursday, April 18, 2002 6:19 pm, Eric Christopherson wrote:
> Hi. I'm having a bad problem with mutt: it tends to hang whenever it
> decides it says "Sorting mailbox..." (any time I try to quit, change
> folders, or recall a postponed message). It simply stops responding, and
> only SIGKILL se
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 05:02:49PM -0500, Eric Christopherson wrote:
> On Thursday, April 18, 2002 6:19 pm, Eric Christopherson wrote:
> > Hi. I'm having a bad problem with mutt: it tends to hang whenever it
> > decides it says "Sorting mailbox..." (any time I try to quit, change
> > folders, or r
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:53:36PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> > But I want it to apply in a send-hook. How can quote it properly ?
> > I tried different combinations of simple quotes, double quotes and
> > backskashes, but no one worked.
>
> Two ideas:
>
> 1. Place this set command i
Hi,
* Patrick Draper [04/24/02 20:03:12 CEST] wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:37:01AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> > I can say from experience that you can even set it to "pdrap.org" and be
> > done with it. That would work for me except for where my wife and I get
> Thanks, setting it to pdra
Hey people.
I have a work account that I'd like to check now and then via imap, but
the server is not always accessible as I must use an IPsec client to create
the connection when I need it.
What's the best way to configure Mutt to make it easy to check my work
imap folders? I don't
Hi,
* Sven Guckes [04/24/02 22:28:31 CEST] wrote:
> webmailers are almost always broken.
Yes.
> there are many reasons to avoid them.
> i'll give a list of reasons - real soon now.
Any chance to include privacy issues? At least there should be
a few notes.
Cheers, Rocco.
msg27619/pgp0.
Eric --
...and then Eric Christopherson said...
%
% On Thursday, April 18, 2002 6:19 pm, Eric Christopherson wrote:
% > Hi. I'm having a bad problem with mutt: it tends to hang whenever it
...
%
% I'd really appreciate it if someone could respond, even if they don't know
% what the cause or so
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Peter Hennicke wrote:
> Hello,
Howdy.
> how can I tell mutt to keep the sent mails?
Since folks mentioned 3 or 4 different ways of doing this, i thought
i'd show you how I do it.
send-hook . my_hdr Fcc: +.sent_`date +%Y_%B`
this creates an outgoing mail box like INBOX
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:39:31PM -0400, Ken Weingold wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
> > perhaps you could explain what functionality is missing in Putty that
> > SecureCRT has? for certain functions, SecureCRT is a lot better, but for
> > many users, Putty is easier to use an
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 11:27:53PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> set record=+sent-mail
The Mutt manual implies that "+" and "=" are simply two
equivalent ways of designating the default location of
mailboxes. No difference?
Tom
--
Dr. Thomas Baker[EMAIL PROTECT
52 matches
Mail list logo
