Re: New mail notify with Maildir "spools"?

2002-03-12 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 10:16:46PM +0100, * Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > »Nicolas Rachinsky« sagte am 2002-03-11 um 01:03:16 +0100 : > > What does ? show? Somebody asked this question > > Hm, just one directory. Changing to just "=" gives me all the > directories. > > Well, se

Re: orange editor -> vim + highlight search

2002-03-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020311 13:12]: > Todd Kokoszka muttered: > > I happily use vi as my editor with mutt. However, when I started using > > commands like d/. or c/; and the like (changing or deleting a line > > until a specific character), my vi display under mutt changed. > > Eac

removing 'move read' prompt and deleting to a folder

2002-03-12 Thread Scott
Hi all, I'm sure these two are easy to fix: 1) How can I turn off the prompt to move read mail into mbox when I quit mutt? I like all my mail to stay in /var/mail so I can retrieve it later via POP. I assume if there is a way then you can also do the same for the purge deleted prompt? 2) Inst

Re: orange editor

2002-03-12 Thread Ben Logan
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:13:07PM +0100, Todd Kokoszka wrote: > Hi, > > I happily use Vi for my editing with Mutt, but I have a problem that > only exists under mutt, not when I regularly run vi. > > When I used the commands d/, or c/> and the like (change or delete > to a specific character, t

Re: removing 'move read' prompt and deleting to a folder

2002-03-12 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 10:29:16PM +1100, * Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > I'm sure these two are easy to fix: > 1) How can I turn off the prompt to move read mail into mbox when I quit mutt? I >like all my mail to stay in /var/mail so I can retrieve it later via POP. I assume

mutt's cvs

2002-03-12 Thread Дмитрий Сиваченко
Hello! Is there CVS tree of mutt available? I wish to taste smime support which should be already in cvs. Thanks!

Re: mutt's cvs

2002-03-12 Thread Will Yardley
??? ? wrote: > > Is there CVS tree of mutt available? > I wish to taste smime support which should be already in cvs. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=mutt+cvs -- Will Yardley william @ newdream . net

Emails to different folders

2002-03-12 Thread Oliver Fuchs
Hi, I am using mutt on SuSe 7.3 Pro to replace my Lotus Notes distribution. I managed the .muttrc file and here is my question: Am I able to move emails in different folders after they have been read? E.g. emails from the mutt-users-list should automatically moved in a folder like /home/me/mutt

Re: Emails to different folders

2002-03-12 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
Please DO NOT reply to random mails, except you want to confuse people who use a threaded view. Thanks Please break lines after about 70 characters. Thanks * On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:15:02PM +0100, * Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using mutt on SuSe 7.3 Pro to replace my Lotus

inadvertent undeletions

2002-03-12 Thread N. Thomas
Blah. I don't know how it happened but right now mutt somehow undeleted a whole bunch of messages in 3 folders that I had marked as deleted. Had to go through an delete them all again... I'm thinking I might have inadvertently hit some keystroke that did this. Is there a function that will do som

Re: Emails to different folders

2002-03-12 Thread Oliver Fuchs
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:24:00PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > Please DO NOT reply to random mails, except you want to confuse people > who use a threaded view. Thanks > > Please break lines after about 70 characters. Thanks > > > * On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:15:02PM +0100, > * Oliver Fuc

Re: Emails to different folders

2002-03-12 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:58:34PM +0100, * Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:24:00PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > * On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:15:02PM +0100, > > * Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am using mutt on SuSe 7.3 Pro to replace

Re: inadvertent undeletions

2002-03-12 Thread David T-G
Noble -- ...and then N. Thomas said... % % Blah. I don't know how it happened but right now mutt somehow undeleted a % whole bunch of messages in 3 folders that I had marked as deleted. Had to go % through an delete them all again... Ouch :-) % % I'm thinking I might have inadvertently hit s

Re: Emails to different folders

2002-03-12 Thread David T-G
Oliver, et al -- ...and then Oliver Fuchs said... % % Thank you for the hints but still do not get it. % I tried: mbox-hook '~C mutt-users' +mutt.users From what I read in the manual, that won't work. The mbox-hook command lets you specify a place to which to move mail for each spool file, no

Re: inadvertent undeletions

2002-03-12 Thread N. Thomas
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:25:10AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > ...and then N. Thomas said... > > > I'm thinking I might have inadvertently hit some keystroke that did > > this. Is there a function that will do something like this? > > Did you accidentally e'x'it out of mutt -- without a sync -- ra

Re: system hang, lost mutt function

2002-03-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* MuttER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020310 02:58]: > Knute, later in this thread solved my problem. > The .signature file was missing! A missing signature file causes mutt 1.3.27 to hang? Well, I just tried to verify this - but no problem! I'll say - the problem must be something else... > Pat Shanaha

Re: inadvertent undeletions

2002-03-12 Thread David T-G
Noble, et al -- ...and then N. Thomas said... % % On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:25:10AM -0500, David T-G wrote: % % > ...and then N. Thomas said... % > % > > I'm thinking I might have inadvertently hit some keystroke that did % > > this. Is there a function that will do something like this? % > %

Re: system hang, lost mutt function

2002-03-12 Thread David T-G
Sven, et al -- ...and then Sven Guckes said... % % * MuttER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020310 02:58]: % > Knute, later in this thread solved my problem. % > The .signature file was missing! % % A missing signature file causes mutt 1.3.27 to hang? % Well, I just tried to verify this - but no problem!

flagged messages in folder_format?

2002-03-12 Thread Ryan Singer
just checked the manual, and it appears that there isn't a way to indicate whether or not a mailbox has flagged messages in it while in the file browser (folder_format has no equivalent to index_format's %S). is there a workaround for this? i'd love to be able to flag messages that i need to deal

Transcoding

2002-03-12 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Could Mutt do transcoding when a character isn't available in the current user's charset? For instance, some people use the "oe" that is in ISO-8859-15. But my charset is ISO-8859-1 (if Mutt can switch the terminal's charset, this would be fine, but I don't know if this is possible). I'd like to

Re: flagged messages in folder_format?

2002-03-12 Thread David T-G
Ryan, et al -- ...and then Ryan Singer said... % % just checked the manual, and it appears that there isn't a way to % indicate whether or not a mailbox has flagged messages in it while % in the file browser (folder_format has no equivalent to % index_format's %S). I'd agree, though I haven't r

mutt 1.3.25 soaking up 100M of memory

2002-03-12 Thread David T-G
Hi, all -- I have a running mutt (pointing to my mutt-users folder, in fact, with some 9200 messages in it) that is currently soaking up 100M of memory. It's been running for quite a while, just like my other mutt processes, but they aren't big (by one, in one case, or two orders of magnitude). W

Re: flagged messages in folder_format? -> grep

2002-03-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* Ryan Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020312 15:45]: > just checked the manual, and it appears that there isn't > a way to indicate whether or not a mailbox has flagged > messages in it while in the file browser (folder_format > has no equivalent to index_format's %S). correct. mutt won't be able t

Re: mutt 1.3.25 soaking up 100M of memory

2002-03-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020312 15:57]: > I have a running mutt .. that is currently soaking up 100M of memory. > It's been running for quite a while, just like my other mutt processes, > but they aren't big (by one, in one case, or two orders of magnitude). > When I start a new mutt on th

Re: Transcoding -> use display_filter

2002-03-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020312 15:49]: > Could Mutt do transcoding when a character isn't > available in the current user's charset? > .. some people use the euro symbol (not in > ISO-8859-1), and I'd like to see "EUR" instead. Should be possible for you with "display_filter"... S

Re: mutt's cvs

2002-03-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* ??? ? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020312 12:08]: > Is there CVS tree of mutt available? Yes. Sven -- $ dog http://www.mutt.org/ | grep -i cvs | sed -e 's###g' The Mutt CVS server has moved from ftp.guug.de to ftp.mutt.org.

Re: Mutt with IMAP - Mozilla and Kmail faster?

2002-03-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* Gerhard Hring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020312 02:11]: > Le 11/03/02 à 17:15, Gerhard Häring écrivit: > > Le 11/03/02 à 15:54, Simon White écrivit: > > > [mutt & imap is slow] > > Reading the ~5000 emails from my mutt-user folder takes approx. 18 > > seconds. That's really slow, IMNSHO. > Apparently,

Re: system hang, lost mutt function

2002-03-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020312 15:25]: > ...and then Sven Guckes said... > % * MuttER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020310 02:58]: > % > Knute, later in this thread solved my problem. > % > The .signature file was missing! > % > % A missing signature file causes mutt 1.3.27 to hang? > % Well, I j

Re: mutt 1.3.25 soaking up 100M of memory

2002-03-12 Thread David T-G
Sven, et al -- ...and then Sven Guckes said... % % * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020312 15:57]: % > I have a running mutt .. that is currently soaking up 100M of memory. ... % > When I start a new mutt on the same folder it only takes some 11M ... % % perhaps the first mutt is female and % t

Re: multiple attachments from command line

2002-03-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* Eduardo J. Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020307 19:20]: > How can I attach more than one file to a message, > without having to press a and browse for each one? mutt -a file1 -a file2 ... -a fileN address Sven -- Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/

Re: system hang, lost mutt function

2002-03-12 Thread David T-G
Sven, et al -- ...and then Sven Guckes said... % % * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020312 15:25]: % > % > Perhaps not a signature file, but perhaps a signature *pipe*. % > All of these folks playing with sigrot get to % > have fun but leave themselves open to difficulties... % % right - anyon

showing corresponding filename in maildir format

2002-03-12 Thread N. Thomas
(This question pertains to Mutt using a Maildir mbox.) If I have a message called $MUTT/foo/cur/1015848003_20331_beach:2,ST that mutt will show as message #34 or whatever. There is nothing in the default display to indicate that message number #34 in folder foo corresponds to the above file.

Re: mutt 1.3.25 soaking up 100M of memory

2002-03-12 Thread Christopher S. Swingley
David, > OK, so when I said "Any ideas are welcome" I really meant about this > particular instantiation :-) Well, it won't tell you much about memory, but you can see what system functions are being called inside the program by using the 'strace' program. Once you've found the process ID numbe

Re: showing corresponding filename in maildir format

2002-03-12 Thread David T-G
Noble -- ...and then N. Thomas said... % % (This question pertains to Mutt using a Maildir mbox.) ... % How could I get the filename of this message? Does it, by chance, have anything to do with the Message-ID: field? If not then I'm at a loss; trying to save the message will put it wherever y

Re: Transcoding -> use display_filter

2002-03-12 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 17:04:47 +0100, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020312 15:49]: > > Could Mutt do transcoding when a character isn't > > available in the current user's charset? > > .. some people use the euro symbol (not in > > ISO-8859-1), and I'd like to see "

Re: mutt's cvs

2002-03-12 Thread David Collantes
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-03-02 10:48 AM EST]: > * ??? ? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020312 12:08]: > > Is there CVS tree of mutt available? > > Yes. I think we are all been smarty pants. Here is what he needs: cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/roessler/cvs login Enter a

Re: Transcoding -> use display_filter

2002-03-12 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 18:01:24 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 17:04:47 +0100, Sven Guckes wrote: > > Should be possible for you with "display_filter"... > > Which means that the header parsing and decoding process must be > performed twice? Isn't there a more efficient

Re: mutt 1.3.25 soaking up 100M of memory

2002-03-12 Thread David T-G
Chris, et al -- ...and then Christopher S. Swingley said... % % David, % % > OK, so when I said "Any ideas are welcome" I really meant about this % > particular instantiation :-) % % Well, it won't tell you much about memory, but you can see what system % functions are being called inside the

Re: flagged messages in folder_format?

2002-03-12 Thread darren chamberlain
Quoting Ryan Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mar 12, 2002 10:46]: > just checked the manual, and it appears that there isn't a way > to indicate whether or not a mailbox has flagged messages in it > while in the file browser (folder_format has no equivalent to > index_format's %S). I wouldn' think th

Re: Emails to different folders

2002-03-12 Thread Oliver Fuchs
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:32:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Oliver, et al -- > > ...and then Oliver Fuchs said... > % > % Thank you for the hints but still do not get it. > % I tried: mbox-hook '~C mutt-users' +mutt.users > > From what I read in the manual, that won't work. The mbox-hook com

Re: Emails to different folders

2002-03-12 Thread David T-G
Oliver -- My, but you really should work on your quote trimming. At least I get rid of *some* of the original message! ...and then Oliver Fuchs said... % % On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:32:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote: ... % > http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl

Re: attribution and quotes

2002-03-12 Thread Sven Guckes
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020312 16:31]: > ...and then Sven Guckes said... > % * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020312 15:25]: > % > Hey, that's kinda slick. Now I have to go back to your > % > pages to figure out how to show tabs that way! :-) > % David - I will you as as soon as use reve

Re: attribution and quotes

2002-03-12 Thread Rob Reid
At 3:19 PM EST on March 12 Sven Guckes sent off: > I am aware that the short date form like 020312 could be mistaken for > 1902-03-12 or 2102-03-12 - but so far it has not been a problem. ;-) You sound like a 1970s COBOL programmer ;-> Anyway, if I didn't know that today is March 12, 2002, I'd

Re: showing corresponding filename in maildir format

2002-03-12 Thread Michael Elkins
N. Thomas wrote: > (This question pertains to Mutt using a Maildir mbox.) > > If I have a message called > >$MUTT/foo/cur/1015848003_20331_beach:2,ST > > that mutt will show as message #34 or whatever. There is nothing in the > default display to indicate that message number #34 in folder f

NetBSD build problems - -lcposix?

2002-03-12 Thread Ken Weingold
I am trying to build mutt even with no configure options, and get this in config.log: configure:1109: checking for strerror in -lcposix configure:1128: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -lcposix 1>&5 /usr/bin/ld: cannot open -lcposix: No such file or directory collect2: ld returned 1 exit sta

Re: NetBSD build problems - -lcposix?

2002-03-12 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 01:32:01PM -0800, Ken Weingold wrote: > I am trying to build mutt even with no configure options, and get this > in config.log: > > configure:1109: checking for strerror in -lcposix > configure:1128: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 conftest.c -lcposix 1>&5 > /usr/bin/ld: cannot

Re: inadvertent undeletions

2002-03-12 Thread David DeSimone
N. Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm thinking I might have inadvertently hit some keystroke that did > this. Is there a function that will do something like this? If you hit the "%" key, it will toggle the folder to read-only mode. None of your changes will be saved when you exit the fo

Re: NetBSD build problems - -lcposix?

2002-03-12 Thread Ken Weingold
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 01:32:01PM -0800, Ken Weingold wrote: > > I am trying to build mutt even with no configure options, and get this > > in config.log: > > > > configure:1109: checking for strerror in -lcposix > > configure:1128: gcc -o conftest -g

Re: attribution and quotes

2002-03-12 Thread Knute
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Rob Reid wrote: > At 3:19 PM EST on March 12 Sven Guckes sent off: > > I am aware that the short date form like 020312 could be mistaken for > > 1902-03-12 or 2102-03-12 - but so far it has not been a problem. ;-) > You sound like a 1970s COBOL programmer ;-> Anyway, if I

Re: NetBSD build problems - -lcposix?

2002-03-12 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 02:08:41PM -0800, Ken Weingold wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2002, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 01:32:01PM -0800, Ken Weingold wrote: > > > I am trying to build mutt even with no configure options, and get this > > > in config.log: > > > > > > configure:1109

Re: NetBSD build problems - -lcposix?

2002-03-12 Thread Ken Weingold
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > Oh, so then maybe it's not related to why make crapped out. Here's > > the error: > > > > pgpkey.o: In function `pgp_ask_for_key': > > /tmp/hazmat/mutt-1.3.27/pgpkey.c:701: undefined reference to `beep' > > beep() is a function in the curses (or nc

Can I open a folder with all threads collapsed?

2002-03-12 Thread Michel
Hello folks, maybe the subject tell for yourself... I'm interested in this feature: open a folder with old mails collapseds (or all mail if only it's function)... Thanks -- Michel - Sorry about my bad english :)

Re: NetBSD build problems - -lcposix?

2002-03-12 Thread David DeSimone
Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would that cause make to error out? > > /tmp/hazmat/mutt-1.3.27/pgpkey.c:701: undefined reference to `beep' > resize.o: In function `mutt_resize_screen': > /tmp/hazmat/mutt-1.3.27/resize.c:79: undefined reference to > `resizeterm' > collect2: ld returne

OT: Re: attribution and quotes

2002-03-12 Thread Rob Reid
At 5:25 PM EST on March 12 Knute sent off: > On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Rob Reid wrote: > > Anyway, if I didn't know that today is March 12, 2002, I'd be tempted to > > read 020312 as an American zip code, > > American zip codes are either 5 or 9 digits, not 6! :) Oh? 90210...yep. Anyway, as a non

Re: NetBSD build problems - -lcposix?

2002-03-12 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 03:10:27PM -0800, Ken Weingold wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2002, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > Oh, so then maybe it's not related to why make crapped out. Here's > > > the error: > > > > > > pgpkey.o: In function `pgp_ask_for_key': > > > /tmp/hazmat/mutt-1.3.27/pgpkey.c:701: un

Re: Can I open a folder with all threads collapsed?

2002-03-12 Thread Rob Reid
At 9:38 PM EST on March 9 Michel sent off: > Hello folks, maybe the subject tell for yourself... > I'm interested in this feature: open a folder with old mails collapseds (or all mail >if only it's function)... Yes. For your .muttrc: # Expand all threads containing unread mail unset collapse

Re: Can I open a folder with all threads collapsed?

2002-03-12 Thread Knute
On Sat, 09 Mar 2002, Michel wrote: > Hello folks, maybe the subject tell for yourself... > I'm interested in this feature: open a folder with old mails collapseds (or all mail >if only it's function)... > Thanks Add this to your ~/.muttrc file: folder-hook . 'push \eV' #collapse all t

Re: NetBSD build problems - -lcposix?

2002-03-12 Thread tim lupfer
* thus spaketh Thomas Dickey (Mar 12 at 06:46PM): > Perhaps the configure script didn't find ncurses (which is a port), or > was fooled into trying to use the NetBSD curses library (not recommended). ...i'm jumping in a bit late on this conversation; but I am using mutt with netbsd curses with n

(*) I've accomplished detach of new mails

2002-03-12 Thread Michel
Hello folks! There was several thread about this in this week! How to personalize viewing of folders in folder_format... See my folder table (the subdirectory "Linux")... 1 mar 09 23:55 1024 .. ../ 2 mar 09 19:37 38911 .

Re: NetBSD build problems - -lcposix?

2002-03-12 Thread Ken Weingold
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002, tim lupfer wrote: > * thus spaketh Thomas Dickey (Mar 12 at 06:46PM): > > > Perhaps the configure script didn't find ncurses (which is a port), or > > was fooled into trying to use the NetBSD curses library (not recommended). > > ...i'm jumping in a bit late on this convers

Can I save all thread collapsed?

2002-03-12 Thread Michel
> > Thanks > > Add this to your ~/.muttrc file: > > folder-hook . 'push \eV' #collapse all threads when entering a folder Still in this thread: How to save all messages of a thread? I need this because I don't got filter mails from mutt users with procmail... The rule is: :0: * ^TO.*[EMA

Re: NetBSD build problems - -lcposix?

2002-03-12 Thread tim lupfer
* thus spaketh Ken Weingold (Mar 12 at 04:35PM): > Well with either no path to curses on the command line or using > what I found on the system, I get the problems. There is a mutt > 1.3.25i installed on the system, and mutt -v says 'System: NetBSD > 1.5.2 (i386) [using ncurses 5.2]'. Any way t

Re: Can I save all thread collapsed?

2002-03-12 Thread Will Yardley
Michel wrote: > Still in this thread: How to save all messages of a thread? > I need this because I don't got filter mails from mutt users with procmail... The >rule is: > > :0: > * ^TO.*[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Linux/mutt that might work, but it's generally better not to use ^TO if possible since

Re: OT: Re: attribution and quotes

2002-03-12 Thread Michael Bain
* Rob Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12 Mar 2002 15:44]: > > I'm against 6 digit dates as a communication standard because they're > easy to misinterpret. Same; hence my choice of the above attribution :-) It's bad enough trying to sort out 12/03/02, 03/12/02 or 02/03/12. Trying to read 120302, 03120