On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Preben Randhol wrote:
> "Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/01/2002 (19:11) :
>
> > You're not responding to his question. (w3m doesn't do javascript
>
> No I didn't say it did. I just said w3m is better than lynx.
tsk, tsk (you should go back and read the pa
Hi,
One (hopefully easily answered) question:
In my index_format I'm using %f to show the From: address of the
message. Sometimes people have a From: header like this:
,-
| "A Good Person" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`-
(note: they don't all use aol)
In the index this displays with the quotation mark
Benjamin Smith wrote:
>
> In the index this displays with the quotation marks included and this
> looks kinda weird, I'm just wondering if this is correct behaviour,
> and even if it is, what can be done about it.
i'm pretty sure this usually depends on whether characters in the
sender's name re
When I read a mail, I usually try to filter my mail from the pager. Every
thing looks fine until I go into my subfolders, and the messages that I save
via the pager are marked as New.
I understand the problem, but how can I fix this? The reason that it bothers
me so much is because I am using I
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 09:33:49AM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Really though, this is probably something better done with a quick
> shell script from the command line.
Could you elaborate on this remark? Are you suggesting working
entirely outside Mutt?
Thanks again,
Jim
"Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/01/2002 (20:31) :
> tsk, tsk (you should go back and read the paragraph to which you
> responded)
Yes I have done it 3 times and I don't understand your point. If you
could please be more clear when you post comments it would be nice.
There were
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 08:28:14PM +0100, Nick Wilson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> * and then Christian Schoepplein blurted
>
> Is this because of the keystroke vs mouse click thing?
> I've been using more and more console apps over the last few months and
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Preben Randhol wrote:
> "Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/01/2002 (20:31) :
> > tsk, tsk (you should go back and read the paragraph to which you
> > responded)
>
> Yes I have done it 3 times and I don't understand your point. If you
> could please be more cle
Adam --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:32:49AM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
% > > that I'm not getting the little 's' flag in the index and I don't seem
% > > to be able to validate the signiture in anyway.
% > Check out:
% > Pcheck-traditional-p
Alas! Matthew D. Fuller spake thus:
> > I agree with that. Seems to me like the only people who would prefer
> > HTML mail would be the PHBs who like the pretty colors and pictures
> > embedded in it.
>
> That would be "The ones who spend the money", right?
Uhhh... shutup.
;)
Just because they
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 06:44:20AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> I presume, then, that they can't thread properly, either. Hmmm. I
> wonder what mailer such contributors are using... ;-)
Not usually Mutt. :) Often the subject will be completely
off, say the ever popular, "Re: blah blah Digest #58.
Alas! Benjamin Smith spake thus:
> Useful for what exactly? I don't really see anything useful below that I
> couldn't find out simply by looking at your orignal message.
Yes, but the same could be said for all quoted text, so why quote at
all?
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
An error
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 11:34:36AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> i suppose you could strip this out somehow, but i don't really see the
> point personally.
1. It doesn't look right
2. If they're added as protection against weird characters, shouldn't
there be a consistent method to remove them aga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Rob 'Feztaa' Park blurted
> Yes, but the same could be said for all quoted text, so why quote at
> all?
That's a good point!
A few people went a little 'foaming at the mouth' on this topic over tha
last few days but it all boils down
Alas! Preben Randhol spake thus:
> Yes I have done it 3 times and I don't understand your point. If you
> could please be more clear when you post comments it would be nice.
> There were no questions in that paragraph.
The person was asking for a browser that could handle javascript. The
one you
On 2002.01.22, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a graceful way to change the Subject: lines on
> a set of tagged messages? Often folks will change the
> ...
> I tried the '|' pipe function, ";|..." piping to:
>
> sed 's/^Subject: .*$/Subject: Re: This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'ello
What kind of monster is would a message containing multipart/alternative
be? Is there somewhere that gives idiots guides to mime types?
Cheers...
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.explodingnet.com
--
Ben --
...and then Benjamin Smith said...
%
% On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 11:34:36AM -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
% > i suppose you could strip this out somehow, but i don't really see the
% > point personally.
%
% 1. It doesn't look right
I can understand that.
% 2. If they're added as protection
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 01:45:37PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Rob 'Feztaa' Park, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Just because they're the ones that spend the money, doesn't mean they
> know what to spend it on!
'Course not!
That's why the helpful salesdroids send them the pretty fluffy friendly
colo
darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In vim:
>
> set titleold=My\ Old\ Xterm\ Title
>
> and it will restore the xterm's title to that string.
Yes, but I'd like Vim to restore the XTerm title to whatever it
was before I started Vim. This might be something different each
time.
Sam --
...and then Samuel Padgett said...
%
% darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
%
% > In vim:
% >
% > set titleold=My\ Old\ Xterm\ Title
% >
% > and it will restore the xterm's title to that string.
%
% Yes, but I'd like Vim to restore the XTerm title to whatever it
% was bef
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, David T-G wrote:
> Sam --
>
> ...and then Samuel Padgett said...
> %
> % darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> %
> % > In vim:
> % >
> % > set titleold=My\ Old\ Xterm\ Title
> % >
> % > and it will restore the xterm's title to that string.
> %
> % Yes, but I'd li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote:
> 'ello
> What kind of monster is would a message containing multipart/alternative
> be? Is there somewhere that gives idiots guides to mime types?
multipart alternative messages are those which have multiple r
On 11:34 23 Jan 2002, Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Benjamin Smith wrote:
| > In the index this displays with the quotation marks included and this
| > looks kinda weird, I'm just wondering if this is correct behaviour,
| > and even if it is, what can be done about it.
|
| i'm pretty
I poked around in the archives and found a simple recipe for saving old messages that
could be run from a command line/script. My version of this became:
#!/bin/sh
mutt -nz -F $HOME/.mutt/mutt.archiving -f test-folder -e "push 'T~d -01/01/02
;s archivetest
q'"
but it isn't *quite* working. The
On 2002.01.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Richard G. Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> mutt -nz -F $HOME/.mutt/mutt.archiving -f test-folder -e "push 'T~d -01/01/02
> ;s archivetest
> q'"
>
> but it isn't *quite* working. The file to which the messages are
> written isn't ar
On 2002.01.23, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Nick Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 'ello
> What kind of monster is would a message containing multipart/alternative
> be? Is there somewhere that gives idiots guides to mime types?
It's a multipart type that provides multiple alternative vi
ing Mutt 1.3.25 at home on Debian Linux (unstable) and 1.3.25 here at
work (Solaris 8 x86) I noticed something a little different. On my home
version, I see an extra "header" called Mix: which says "no chain
defined". Here at work, I don't see said header. I'm using the same
config file on both, s
On [2002-Jan-23] David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Looks like your push sequence is just appending to the default name
> already in the edit buffer. One way around this would be just to put a
> as the first binding after the ";s".
That does it very nicely, thanks!
Rich
On Jan 23, Carl B. Constantine [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> ing Mutt 1.3.25 at home on Debian Linux (unstable) and 1.3.25 here at
> work (Solaris 8 x86) I noticed something a little different. On my home
> version, I see an extra "header" called Mix: which says "no chain
> defined". Here at work,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 03:36:52PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> I don't know about the macro you found, but it seems that either a toggle
> macro (the same keystroke(s) to turn things on and off) or a macro that
it looks like this (a bit clumsy imho):
macro pager V "set
pgp_verify_sig\nunset
pgp_
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 Francis A. Holop spewed into the ether:
>
> hello,
>
> > > the outgoing mail could be counted somehow
> > > using mutt's capabilities and that's why
> >
> > Well, as David pointed out, you could just increment a counter, but I
> > prefer mailstat's output, as it shows m
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 Hanspeter Roth spewed into the ether:
>
> Some mailinglists prefix every subject with the name of the list.
> Is it possible to suppress this prefix in the index_format? How?
> Or is this a case for procmail?
This works for me :
http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/files/su
What's the easyiest way to delete message 1-2000?
On Jan 23, Jason Nealis [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> What's the easyiest way to delete message 1-2000?
D~m 1-2000
D - delete-pattern
~m 1-2000 - pattern for messages 1-2000
msg23633/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 04:30:31PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> What about just using %F instead?
Yes, that what I want, thanks. Should have read the manual.
--
Benjamin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
msg23634/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
36 matches
Mail list logo
