* Johannes Zellner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010914 05:10]:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 04:05:26PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > Johannes Zellner [12/09/01 12:04 +0200]:
> > > how do I use mutt with an EXCHANGE server ?
> > > Actually I can already READ mail by having
> > > set imap_user=""
>
On (14/09/01 15:00), David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Ailbhe Leamy said...
% On (14/09/01 09:41), David T-G wrote:
[attribs snipped, because it's basically a David-Ailbhe-David
discussion so far]
% Having a valid From: address is hardly the same as adding a
% pgp-signature to things.
%
% Havi
On (14/09/01 15:26), Justin R. Miller wrote:
> Ailbhe, you should read up on the web of trust. While it is the weak
> point in public key crypto, it answers your question.
Trouble with the web of trust is that I don't trust it unless it
contains a fairly high proportion of people I know and tru
Hi
First of all I'd just like to say that mutt rocks... I can't live
without it :)
However, I'm having a little problem... It seems to be deleting messages
from ~/mbox which are older than a week or so. Is it possible to turn off
this behavior? I don't see anything in the documentation abou
Hello,
I am having difficulty finding the documentation on how to edit the
'reply description', in which the mailer prints out something to the
effect of "on such-and-such a date so-and-so wrote --" I would like to
change the default on this, and I am pretty sure it is possible, but I
am having d
melissa ion kibbe muttered:
> I am having difficulty finding the documentation on how to edit the
> 'reply description', in which the mailer prints out something to the
> effect of "on such-and-such a date so-and-so wrote --"
The var you are looking for is called attribution.
HTH,
Michael
--
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:23:55PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Gord --
>
> ...and then Gord Mc.Pherson said...
> % Hi,
> %
> %Is there a way to have mutt automatically bounce a message from a
> % specific email address. The only reference to bouncing email is
> % 'bounce_delivered' and I don't
Rino, Federico, et al --
...and then Jean-Sebastien Morisset said...
% On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 08:46:49PM -0400, Federico Grau wrote:
% >
% > messages. However it does not automatically verify inline pgp messages,
% > unless i pipe them to "gpg --verify". is there a better way (i checked my
%
Rino --
...and then Rino Mardo said...
% On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 08:46:49PM -0400 or thereabouts, Federico Grau wrote:
% >
% > set pgp_create_traditional=yes
% >
% > from the man page:
...
% > Also note that using the old-style PGP message for?
% > mat is strongly de
Federico, et al --
...and then Federico Grau said...
% On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:20:30AM +0800, Rino Mardo wrote:
% > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 08:46:49PM -0400 or thereabouts, Federico Grau wrote:
% > >
% > >
% > > set pgp_create_traditional=yes
% > >
% > > from the man page:
...
% > >
Cliff --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
%
% I use postfix and have it do a header check for a particular sender
% who keeps sending mail to my domain (usual stuff about earning
% millions)...
WHAT?! THERE'S A WAY TO EARN MILLIONS VIA EMAIL?!?!?!? IS IT FAST, OR
DOES IT TAKE A LONG TIME?
Matt --
...and then Matt Spong said...
% Hi
Hello!
%
% First of all I'd just like to say that mutt rocks... I can't live
% without it :)
I know what you mean!
%
% However, I'm having a little problem... It seems to be deleting messages
% from ~/mbox which are older than a week or so. I
Melissa --
...and then melissa ion kibbe said...
% Hello,
Hello!
% I am having difficulty finding the documentation on how to edit the
% 'reply description', in which the mailer prints out something to the
% effect of "on such-and-such a date so-and-so wrote --" I would like to
It's called t
Ailbhe --
...and then Ailbhe Leamy said...
% On (14/09/01 15:00), David T-G wrote:
%
% > ...and then Ailbhe Leamy said...
% % On (14/09/01 09:41), David T-G wrote:
% [attribs snipped, because it's basically a David-Ailbhe-David
% discussion so far]
Oh, but that's where the fun comes in! :-)
Matt --
...and then Matt Spong said...
% Hi
Hello!
%
% > Unless you (or, since you still have the bubbling enthusiasm of the newly
% > enlightened,
%
% Nope... been using mutt for 2 years now. :)
Hokay, you're simply bubbly like I am :-)
%
% > perhaps your SysAdmin) have done some fussi
Am 11.09.2001 (18:21) schrieb Ben Jones:
> > I still get an error message saying 'PGP signature could NOT be
> > verified.'
> Try this line in your .muttrc . . .
> set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Good signature from"
I am using a german environment, it works well with
set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Korrekt
I decided to give GnuPG a try. I've exported/imported my keys and
configured Mutt. The only thing that remains a mystery is how to retrieve
new public keys from within mutt. I wrote a little script for PGP I used
to call using "!pgp-get ", but that was a bit tedious, and one of
the reasons I switc
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:18:36PM -0400, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote:
> I decided to give GnuPG a try. I've exported/imported my keys and
> configured Mutt. The only thing that remains a mystery is how to retrieve
> new public keys from within mutt. I wrote a little script for PGP I used
> to c
> % Nope... been using mutt for 2 years now. :)
>
> Hokay, you're simply bubbly like I am :-)
Yep :)
> Nope; short and sweet, and nothing scary looking.
Hrm. :\
> % When I switch to a different mailbox or quit, it asks me if I want to
> % move messages to ~/mbox.
>
> And do you say yes or no
Hi Folks,
Does anyone know how I can stop message bleed-thru with gpg? When I'm
reading messages, I find that if during the execution of gpg makes the
screen scroll up a line or two, I get bleed-thru from the previous
message. (hope that makes sense).
Anyhow I find it quite d
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 12:04:51PM +0100, Ailbhe Leamy wrote:
> OK, all of this I understand. I completely fail to understand why it
> should apply to public communication, as distinct from private
> communication.
Because it is still important to know that a public message comes
from the person
* Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Sat-01 00:16 -0700]:
>
>On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 08:00:17PM -0700 or thereabouts, Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
>> * Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-Fri-01 19:56 -0700]:
>> >
>> >On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 04:45:37PM -0700 or thereabouts, Denis Perelyubskiy
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:14:48AM -0400 or thereabouts, melissa ion kibbe wrote:
> Hello,
> I am having difficulty finding the documentation on how to edit the
> 'reply description', in which the mailer prints out something to the
> effect of "on such-and-such a date so-and-so wrote --" I would
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 at 10:48:30 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Piet Delport [14/09/01 00:40 +0200]:
> > Actually, i remember ssmtp running quite well when used mutt on Cygwin
> > (i've since moved to FreeBSD, thank Eris). It can be installed very
> > easily via Cygwin's setup.exe, AFAIR,
Gord --
...and then Gord Mc.Pherson said...
% Hi Folks,
Hello!
%
%Does anyone know how I can stop message bleed-thru with gpg? When I'm
...
%the screen, but that means having to hit ctrl-l after every message
%that's been digitally signed.
I'm sorry I can't provide more detail (a
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 at 11:52:50 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> With Mutt 1.3.22.1, when I type 's' to save a message to a mailbox:
>
> The up arrow (history-up) seems to behave correctly, going backward
> through the history. But when I use the down arrow (history-down),
> instead of going forwa
--a2FkP9tdjPU2nyhF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 at 07:03:19 -0400, David T-G wrote:
> % ---BEGIN---
> % #!/bin/sh
> ...
> % pgp $* 2>$PGP_ERR 1>$PGP_OUT
>=20
> BTW, you might want to modify
--JBi0ZxuS5uaEhkUZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 at 09:26:48 -0400, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Olaf Schulz said...
[...]
> % But (at least in mutt 12.5i) trying to type ':tag-thread' whil
Cliff Sarginson [15/09/01 13:53 +0200]:
> I think this should be handled by the MTA.
> I use postfix and have it do a header check for a particular sender
> who keeps sending mail to my domain (usual stuff about earning
> millions)...
> I presume sendmail can do this as well in it's own mysteriou
29 matches
Mail list logo
