RE: Error when sending mail

2001-01-19 Thread Redak, Dorian
Thanks for the hint. I'm using qmail's sendmail wrapper. The sendmail binary is executable and all qmail processes are running. cheers -Original Message- From: Suresh Ramasubramanian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 7:15 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: Er

Re: Error when sending mail

2001-01-19 Thread Brian D. Winters
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:17:07AM +0100, Redak, Dorian wrote: > Thanks for the hint. > I'm using qmail's sendmail wrapper. The sendmail binary is executable and > all qmail processes are running. Do you have dsn_notify or dsn_return enabled? If so, don't. qmail doesn't support DSN. Brian

Re: Default mailbox display?

2001-01-19 Thread Dave Pearson
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 09:01:42PM -0800, Trae McCombs wrote: > One thing that I think would help not only me, but tons of others is > something like this: > > mailbox 1 3 new messages > mailbox 2 12 new messages > mailbox 3 8 new messages > > > Where you had the "

Re: Default mailbox display?

2001-01-19 Thread Christoph Bugel
I also wanted to use my arrow keys to navigate through folders. (like I did in pine.) what I have now is: macro index "?" this binds the key to get you to the change-folder menu, f you are in the message index. (I think you need the mailboxes command to tell mutt which folders you have) also

Re: Default mailbox display?

2001-01-19 Thread Heinrich Langos
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:27:53AM +, Dave Pearson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 09:01:42PM -0800, Trae McCombs wrote: > > > One thing that I think would help not only me, but tons of others is > > something like this: > > > > mailbox 1 3 new messages > > mailbox 2 12 n

Re: German umlauts and alternates in Mutt.

2001-01-19 Thread Michael Tatge
Jens Paulus muttered: > 1.) How can I configure Mutt and teach it to display German umlauts? I could > not find any instructions in Mutt's manual about this topic. In the default > settings, it always replaces these special characters by a question mark (`?') > in the builtin pager and by a dot (`

Re: Default mailbox display?

2001-01-19 Thread Dave Pearson
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 12:24:40PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:27:53AM +, Dave Pearson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 09:01:42PM -0800, Trae McCombs wrote: > > > > > mailbox 1 3 new messages > > > mailbox 2 12 new messages > > > mailbox 3

Re: how to "toggle-signature" display in pager?

2001-01-19 Thread Conor Daly
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 10:51:58PM -0500 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, mike polniak thought: > Many of the signatures are getting larger than the informational > part of the message. I would like to remove this clutter from the pager > with something like "toggle-signature" which would b

Re: Default mailbox display?

2001-01-19 Thread Dirk Ruediger
Hi Heinrich, > > > One thing that I think would help not only me, but tons of others is > > > something like this: > > > > > > mailbox 1 3 new messages > > > mailbox 2 12 new messages > > > mailbox 3 8 new messages > > how about this ? > > Mail/mutt-users [Msgs:4

RE: Error when sending mail

2001-01-19 Thread Redak, Dorian
Thanks to all, problem is solved: set sendmail="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject" -Original Message- From: Brian D. Winters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 9:57 AM To: Redak, Dorian Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Error when sending mail On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at

Re: Encrypting attachments with GnuPG so that Eudora can see it... SOLUTION

2001-01-19 Thread David T-G
MM -- ...and then msquared said... % On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 01:23:06PM -0500, David T-G wrote: % % > encrypt and sign a message to Eudora users. As far as I can tell, you % > can only send with pgp_create_traditional, and I haven't even seen % > attachments working with encryption. % % Yes!

Re: Error when sending mail

2001-01-19 Thread Joe Philipps
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 11:45:24AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >Redak, Dorian proclaimed on mutt-users that: > >> Dear All! >> When sending mail I receive the following error: >> Error sending message, child exited 127 (Exec error.) > > Sendmail (or whatever MTA you have) is not running

Procmail Filtering

2001-01-19 Thread Nelson D. Guerrero
Good day/night everyone, I know this is not the place for this, but I'll give it a try anyways. A couple of months ago I found myself in the need of changing the "Realname" part of an email. To make myself a little clear, I tried to change: 'JOSEFINA EDWARDS to Sophy Edwards'. For this I user

Re: how to "toggle-signature" display in pager?

2001-01-19 Thread mike polniak
Conor Daly wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 10:51:58PM -0500 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, > mike polniak thought: > > Many of the signatures are getting larger than the informational > > part of the message. I would like to remove this clutter from the pager > > with something like "toggl

Re: Procmail Filtering

2001-01-19 Thread Frank Booth
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 11:17:29AM +, Nelson wrote: > These are the lines I added to my .procmailrc: > > :0 FBw > * ^From:.*JOSEFINA > | sed -e 's/"JOSEFINA EDWARD"/"Sophy Edwards"/g' what is "F"?, "f" is filter so do you mean fBw? -- Frank Booth - Consultant

Re: Encrypting attachments with GnuPG so that Eudora can see it... SOLUTION

2001-01-19 Thread msquared
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 01:23:06PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > % PROBLEM: > % > % Suppose I send a GPG-encrypted email that has an attachment. I then send > % it to someone who is using Eudora 5.0 with PGP Freeware 6.5.8 to read > % their email. > > That's certainly a problem -- a known one. Yo

Re: Procmail Filtering

2001-01-19 Thread Nelson D. Guerrero
* On Fri Jan 19 2001, Frank Booth screamed: -> On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 11:17:29AM +, Nelson wrote: -> > These are the lines I added to my .procmailrc: -> > -> > :0 FBw -> > * ^From:.*JOSEFINA -> > | sed -e 's/"JOSEFINA EDWARD"/"Sophy Edwards"/g' -> -> what is "F"?, "f" is filter so do you

Re: Encrypting attachments with GnuPG so that Eudora can see it... SOLUTION

2001-01-19 Thread Sven Guckes
* msquared <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010119 15:53]: > Yes! I figured it out! In order to send encrypted attachments and > such to Eudora, the MIME content that is encrypted MUST have the > following as its FIRST header: > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Anyone know the correct procedure for notifying the

Re: Procmail Filtering

2001-01-19 Thread Douglas L . Potts
Quoting Nelson D. Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * On Fri Jan 19 2001, Frank Booth screamed: > -> On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 11:17:29AM +, Nelson wrote: > -> > These are the lines I added to my .procmailrc: > -> > > -> > :0 FBw > -> > * ^From:.*JOSEFINA [--- snipped intermediate message where

Re: Procmail Filtering

2001-01-19 Thread Nelson D. Guerrero
* On Fri Jan 19 2001, Douglas L . Potts screamed: -> [--- snipped intermediate message where 'F' was changed to 'f' ---] -> Don't believe you need the 'B' in there, you are matching on the Header -> lines not the body lines. -> -> B Egrep the body. -> Ok, I removed the 'B' from the

SCO version?

2001-01-19 Thread Steven J Hall
I'm trying to get mutt working on SCO Unix OSR5, without much success. SCO does distribute a pre-compiled copy as part of their "Skunkware" project, but it is version 0.93.1 and there seems to be a problem with the From: field when sending messages (it comes up root@@, which can't be replied to).

Re: Procmail Filtering

2001-01-19 Thread Douglas L . Potts
Quoting Nelson D. Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [--- snip ---] > procmail: Extraneous filter-flag ignored > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 12:40:04 2001 > Subject: Test >Folder: Inbox673 > > and my .procmailrc reads: > > :0 fw > ^From:

Re: German umlauts and alternates in Mutt.

2001-01-19 Thread Wilhelm Wienemann
Hello Jens! On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Jens Paulus wrote: > Hi there, I have two questions. Why didn't read you the answers to the same question from ---> cut here < - From: Jens Paulus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: German umlauts and alternates in Mutt. To:

Re: Procmail Filtering

2001-01-19 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 12:41 -0500 19 Jan 2001, "Douglas L . Potts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > :0 fw > ^From:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED] > | sed -e 's/"JOSEFINA EDWARD"/"Sophy Edwards"/g' >> INBOX If you redirect the output to a file, the recipe is no longer working as a filter so the f flag should be removed. You should

addressing problem

2001-01-19 Thread Brian Noble
I am using mutt on an internal screened network and it seems that somehow my hostname and domainname are not getting put together properly. Let me explain. My FQDN machine name is bnoble.inhouse.us.lan (this is not the actual name) and the mail server that I am using is named mail.us.lan (agai

Re: addressing problem

2001-01-19 Thread Martin
On Friday, January 19, 2001 (CS:5.03.019) 11:53:32 [AM] (-0800) Brian Noble [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote... 1: Please trim your lines to 76-78 chars per line! THX 2: This list is [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I am using mutt on an internal screened network and it seems that somehow my >

SSL Error, Mutt 1.2.5

2001-01-19 Thread Tres Hofmeister
I've compiled Mutt 1.2.5 on a Debian 2.2 (potato) system, using the following configure options: --enable-imap --with-ssl --enable-pop The build goes fine, but when I attempt to connect to our SSL-wrapped IMAP server, I get an error immediately after accepting the site certif

Re: addressing problem

2001-01-19 Thread Frank Pittel
A couple of this to check and try. The first thing to do is check your mail configuration. You can do this via a command line invocation of sendmail I like to set debug mode so I can see what sendmail sets the from header to. Unless the machine you're sending the mail from is visable on the inte

Multi-Line Colored Quoting?

2001-01-19 Thread Phil Gregory
I really like mutt's ability to color quoted text. Unfortunately, it appears to only be able to recognize quotes on a single line. On some mailing lists I'm on, people use multiline quoting mechanisims that mutt doesn't understand. An example: This is the beginning of the quoted text. It

Re: Multi-Line Colored Quoting?

2001-01-19 Thread Rich Lafferty
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 05:19:08PM -0500, Phil Gregory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Not entirely mutt-related, but does anyone know, off the top of their > head, if there are any perl modules for manipulating email messages. > (If I have to parse the message externally, a perl module that > und

Re: Default mailbox display?

2001-01-19 Thread Wilhelm Wienemann
Hello Heinrich! On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Heinrich Langos wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:27:53AM +, Dave Pearson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 09:01:42PM -0800, Trae McCombs wrote: > > > > > One thing that I think would help not only me, but tons of others is > > > something like this:

Re: SSL Error, Mutt 1.2.5

2001-01-19 Thread Tommi Komulainen
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 02:13:57PM -0700, Tres Hofmeister wrote: > The build goes fine, but when I attempt to connect to our > SSL-wrapped IMAP server, I get an error immediately after accepting > the site certificate. For example: > > tres$ mutt -f '{imap/ssl}' > [I see: > -- Mutt: SSL

pgp 6.5.8 encrypt fails

2001-01-19 Thread rex
When invoked from mutt 1.2.5, pgp 6.5.8 fails when trying to encrypt to an untrusted (it works with a trusted key) key with the message: === Pretty Good Privacy(tm) Version 6.5.8 (c) 1999 Network Associates Inc. Uses the RSAREF(tm) T

Re: SSL Error, Mutt 1.2.5

2001-01-19 Thread Tres Hofmeister
On 2001-01-20, Tommi Komulainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : : IIRC the reason for 'NONE' is that there's a slight mismatch between : client and server SSL protocols and versions. See below. Ah, thanks. That's helpful. : In this case the FM would be README.SSL: I've already

Re: pgp 6.5.8 encrypt fails

2001-01-19 Thread rex
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 02:52:33PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > When invoked from mutt 1.2.5, pgp 6.5.8 fails when trying to encrypt > to an untrusted (it works with a trusted key) key with the message: [...] > So the failure appears to be that mutt uses the default response of > "N" inst

Re: SSL Error, Mutt 1.2.5

2001-01-19 Thread Tommi Komulainen
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 04:13:55PM -0700, Tres Hofmeister wrote: > I've already tried all of Mutt's ssl_use_* options in various > combinations, with no difference in the behaviour. The "openssl" > tests all seem to be about the same, looks like there's a handshaking > problem. The results

resizing error - compiling

2001-01-19 Thread Eric Smith
Reply-To: I am trying to fix an annoying problem in mutt in that it refuses to resize - stick at 24 lines for example. Installed ncurses 5.0 and tried [root@apple mutt-1.2.5]# ./configure --with-curses=/usr/include/ncurses ... during make, got this: cc -DSHAREDIR=\"/usr/local/share/mutt\" -DS

Re: Nvi saved the file mutt-incursion-5855-11

2001-01-19 Thread Robert Martinovic
Hey, How do I get rid of this annoying message that I get on a daily basis. I have editor="emacs -nw" in my .muttrc Thanks Rob On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 08:51:24AM +1100, Nvi recovery program wrote: > On Mon Nov 13 22:27:45 2000, the user mlaich was editing a > file named /tmp/mutt-incursion-58

Re: addressing problem

2001-01-19 Thread Robert Martinovic
Hey, On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:45:58PM +0100, Martin wrote: > 1: Please trim your lines to 76-78 chars per line! THX I am curious on how this is done. Rob -- ---> mlaich.com Robert Martinovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.mlaic

Re: how to "toggle-signature" display in pager?

2001-01-19 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
At 09:46 AM 1/19/01 +, Conor Daly wrote: >You could try >color signature black black >in .muttrc. You'll get lots of empty lines for long sigs but, at least, >no text clutter Sadly, people with long signatures often lack the clue to have a proper sig seperator (dash dash space ) so this re