Re: mutt/sendmail mailing list problem

2000-10-04 Thread Peter Jaques
it does; i used to get all the "x-authentication-warning"s, till i changed my sendmail.cf. & sendmail IS honoring the -f; it correctly sets the "From " header. it just doesn't set "Return-path" right. peter On 3 Oct 00, 2:23PM, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > If you're passing -f to sendmail (either m

Re: mutt/sendmail mailing list problem

2000-10-04 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Peter Jaques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 04 Oct 2000: > it does; i used to get all the "x-authentication-warning"s, till i changed > my sendmail.cf. & sendmail IS honoring the -f; it correctly sets the > "From " header. it just doesn't set "Return-path" right. That doesn't make sense. The

Re: sometimes 'L' works for me. sometimes it doesn't.

2000-10-04 Thread Mikko Hänninen
raf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 04 Oct 2000: > i seem to remember the > doco for subscribe saying that it is used to specify the mailing lists to which > you are subscribed. to me, that means the actual addresses of mailing lists > or aliases for those addresses, not regular expressions that

new operator for (~t | ~c)

2000-10-04 Thread the/eXtreme
I have a lot of save-hooks that look like this one: save-hook '(~t ^mutt-users | ~c ^mutt-users)' =mutt and I wondered if anyone else thought a new operator like `~tc' might be convenient, e.g.: save-hook '~tc ^mutt-users' =mutt

Re: new operator for (~t | ~c)

2000-10-04 Thread Mikko Hänninen
the/eXtreme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 04 Oct 2000: > I have a lot of save-hooks that look like this one: > > save-hook '(~t ^mutt-users | ~c ^mutt-users)' =mutt > > and I wondered if anyone else thought a new operator > like `~tc' might be convenient, e.g.: > > save-hook '~tc ^mutt-user

Re: new operator for (~t | ~c)

2000-10-04 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
On Wed, 04 Oct 2000, the/eXtreme wrote: > I have a lot of save-hooks that look like this one: > > save-hook '(~t ^mutt-users | ~c ^mutt-users)' =mutt > > and I wondered if anyone else thought a new operator > like `~tc' might be convenient, e.g.: > > save-hook '~tc ^mutt-users' =mutt set defa

Re: mutt/sendmail mailing list problem

2000-10-04 Thread Claus Assmann
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000, Peter Jaques wrote: > it does; i used to get all the "x-authentication-warning"s, till i changed > my sendmail.cf. & sendmail IS honoring the -f; it correctly sets the > "From " header. it just doesn't set "Return-path" right. This is somewhat off-topic for mutt... The Retu

lock count exceeded

2000-10-04 Thread Michael Atighetchi
Hi there, I'm using mutt 1.2.5i under both cygwin and linux. I've set up my mail folder to reside on a FAT16 partition (to be used by mutt in cygwin). I mount the partition under Linux with VFAT and link them symbolically to /var/spool/mail. I understand there is a locking problem - and it's p

Re: lock count exceeded

2000-10-04 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Michael Atighetchi [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > I'm using mutt 1.2.5i under both cygwin and linux. > I've set up my mail folder to reside on a FAT16 partition (to be used by > mutt in cygwin). I mount the partition under Linux with VFAT and link > them symbolically to /var/spool/mail. > > I under

cmutt & xmutt... where?

2000-10-04 Thread Jan Houtsma
Hi, Had them on a previous system. Now with this RH7.0 machine i can't find them anymore. Where can i download these files? thanks, jan -- ___ ___ ___ / // // / Jan H. Houtsma / // // / Comeniushof 92 / /___

Re: Tagging a Deleted file.

2000-10-04 Thread Michael Elkins
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 05:01:19PM +0200, GianPiero Puccioni wrote: > I found out (when I tagged and printed a big message I didn't wont by > mistake) that "t" when tags a file then moves to the following file even > if it's marked for Delete, unlike "j" or DownArrow. > > Is this a bug, a feature

Re: cmutt & xmutt... where?

2000-10-04 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Jan Houtsma proclaimed on mutt-users that: > Had them on a previous system. Now with this RH7.0 machine i can't > find them anymore. Where can i download these files? In the same path as mutt is - /usr/bin on my box (also running guinness) [suresh@mjollnir] ~$ which mutt /usr/bin/mutt [su

international characters

2000-10-04 Thread Marcelo C . Martinelli
I am trying to get mutt to display Portuguese accented characters for a while and i am stuck. Can anyone help me? I use a standard US keyboard with the emacs2 character map provide in the Slackware 7.1 install. Thanks! PGP signature

Re: cmutt & xmutt... where?

2000-10-04 Thread Jeff Howie
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 08:39:32PM +0200, Jan Houtsma wrote: > Had them on a previous system. Now with this RH7.0 machine i can't > find them anymore. Where can i download these files? I don't have them either. Waht exactly is xmutt, etc...

Re: cmutt & xmutt... where?

2000-10-04 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-10-05 00:22:40 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > [suresh@mjollnir] ~$ which mutt > /usr/bin/mutt > [suresh@mjollnir] ~$ which cmutt > /usr/bin/cmutt > [suresh@mjollnir] ~$ which xmutt > /usr/bin/xmutt What on earth are cmutt and xmutt supposed to be? -- Thomas Roessler

Re: Different signature/tag line each day/email.

2000-10-04 Thread Timothy Grant
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 10:47:35AM -0400, Bob Bell wrote: > Wouldn't something like this work and be simpler? > > set signature='(cat .signature && fortune -s) |' I've been playing around with some stuff to put my uptime in my signature. You can see that it works from the sig below. I use t

Re: Different signature/tag line each day/email.

2000-10-04 Thread Charles Curley
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 01:32:30PM -0700, Timothy Grant wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 10:47:35AM -0400, Bob Bell wrote: > > Wouldn't something like this work and be simpler? > > > > set signature='(cat .signature && fortune -s) |' > > I've been playing around with some stuff to put my upt

Re: Different signature/tag line each day/email.

2000-10-04 Thread Timothy Grant
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 04:25:45PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > > > > How do I pass an argument to a script in my .muttrc? > > I don't think you do. > > What I do is this: I have a perl script which does what I want: so much > time to a certain event (which I am not using here). I customize i

Re: Different signature/tag line each day/email.

2000-10-04 Thread Benjamin Korvemaker
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 04:25:45PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 01:32:30PM -0700, Timothy Grant wrote: [snip] > > Problem is that I have two signatures, the formal one below, and an informal > > one. So I modified my script to take an argument depending on the sigfile I >

Send hook question

2000-10-04 Thread Hal Burgiss
Should the below not work? I could swear it used to ;) Recently even. Despite much playing with this, I cannot get the header to handle the exceptions. unset use_from send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' send-hook redhat-list 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'

Re: mutt/sendmail mailing list problem

2000-10-04 Thread Peter Jaques
here are the headers from a message i sent from mutt to my other account: >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 4 17:06:04 2000 Received: from dnai.com (dnai.com [207.181.194.98]) by occs.cs.oberlin.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA19065 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:5

Re: Send hook question

2000-10-04 Thread Harold Oga
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 07:58:13PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote: >Should the below not work? I could swear it used to ;) Recently even. >Despite much playing with this, I cannot get the header to handle the >exceptions. > > >unset use_from >send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' >s

Re: Different signature/tag line each day/email.

2000-10-04 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Timothy Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 04 Oct 2000: > send-hook exceptionalminds.com set signature='(buildsig .siginformal)|' > This doesn't work. and mutt spits up over it. > > How do I pass an argument to a script in my .muttrc? I'm using signature="randsig.sh ~/.sig-body|" curren

Re: mutt/sendmail mailing list problem

2000-10-04 Thread Claus Assmann
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000, Peter Jaques wrote: > here are the headers from a message i sent from mutt to my other account: > > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 4 17:06:04 2000 That's what you want right? > Received: (from mugwort@localhost) > by sol.A (8.9.3/8.9.3)

Re: Send hook question

2000-10-04 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 06:25:47PM -0600, Harold Oga wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 07:58:13PM -0400, Hal Burgiss wrote: > >Should the below not work? I could swear it used to ;) Recently > >even. Despite much playing with this, I cannot get the header to > >handle the exceptions. > > > >unset u