Re: reply macro

On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 11:32:35AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > >The "script" method, I hope :-) Yeah, once the script exists, it's easy > >enough for anyone to use it. > > Making local copies of the script for every user would be tedious,

Re: Two "problems" with mutt-1.2

On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 09:39:32AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote: > My other problem is *no* colors at all. I'm using the same .muttrc file > as before and I had colors. Did I miss a configure option ?? Typing > "mutt -v" shows the "+HAVE_COLOR" flag. FWIW, here's all of what "mutt > -v" shows: > >

Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance.

On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 05:13:10PM -0500, Larry P. Schrof wrote: > Mutt version: > > Mutt 1.0.1i (2000-01-18) > > Is this a bug? > == > > generic binding seems to be broke. Am I doing something wrong? > > bind generic j previous-entry > bind generic k next-entry > bind index j noop

maildirs with both mail and other maildirs in them

I have a maildir which has mail delivered to it directly (i.e. it has cur, new and tmp directories in it) but it also has other maildir folders in it. Mutt doesn't seem to be able to cope with this at all, am I missing something or is it just not possible to handle this with mutt? -- Chris Gree

Re: Can't read cyrillic messages

Hello Sergei! On Wed, 17 May 2000, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: > I can't seem to be able to read messages in cyrillic with mutt. > Setting charset to ISO-8859-5 or KOI8-r does not help at all. This is > the compile options: ...they are looking OK. It sounds that it wont be a problem with mutt but

Re: maildirs with both mail and other maildirs in them

On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 09:52:19AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > I have a maildir which has mail delivered to it directly (i.e. it has > cur, new and tmp directories in it) but it also has other maildir > folders in it. Mutt doesn't seem to be able to cope with this at all, > am I missing something

Re: maildirs with both mail and other maildirs in them

On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 02:28:17AM -0700, Brian D. Winters wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 09:52:19AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > I have a maildir which has mail delivered to it directly (i.e. it has > > cur, new and tmp directories in it) but it also has other maildir > > folders in it. Mutt

fix for redhat 1.2i mutt char encodings

i asked last week about a more recent rpm that did not have broken SHAREDIR, etc. like the original redhat 6.2 had. redhat released an update, mutt-1.2i-2, but it needs to have --enable-locales-fix added to the ./prepare line for accented chars to print (the --with-charmaps option does not seem t

Interesting From: header problem

Okay.. I've searched the mailing list archives for this, but it seems that I'm the only person trying to do exactly this, and I can't seem to make mutt do it. Perhaps some of you out there can help. Basically, I want to change my From: header under certain conditions. These conditions are: (1) R

Putting warnings into mutt

Is it possible to put warning messages in the status bar with a macro like "There are no messages." or "You are on the last page." thanks, Antoine

Re: reply macro

Suresh -- ...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said... % David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that: % % >The "script" method, I hope :-) Yeah, once the script exists, it's easy % >enough for anyone to use it. % % Making local copies of the script for every user would be tedious, to say % the leas

Re: reply macro

David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that: >What, you can make a dummy login that can handle mail addressed to >anyone, but not a script? Just put the script in /usr/local/bin and >let the calling user (you know, that guy who pipes it a message) provide >the From: info without even trying! Yep

Re: reply macro

Suresh -- ...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said... % David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that: % % >What, you can make a dummy login that can handle mail addressed to % >anyone, but not a script? Just put the script in /usr/local/bin and % >let the calling user (you know, that guy who pipes

Re: Two "problems" with mutt-1.2

> Hall Stevenson proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > >set sendmail_wait=<0 > > Try sendmail_wait=-1 :) Thank you ;-) I'll give it a try this afternoon. Can I assume you use this setting and it *does* work ?? Regards, Hall

Re: Two "problems" with mutt-1.2

> On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 09:39:32AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote: > > My other problem is *no* colors at all. I'm using the same .muttrc file > > as before and I had colors. Did I miss a configure option ?? Typing > > "mutt -v" shows the "+HAVE_COLOR" flag. FWIW, here's all of what "mutt > > -v" s

Re: reply macro

David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that: >Of course, if you already have one, then it probably *is* the easier way >to go ;-) It is, believe me :) And you wouldn't believe the amount of spam it attracts :) >I'd probably be of about the same viewpoint, since I do, too (I counted >them the othe

Re: Binding bug + minor annoyance.

Chris, et al -- ...and then Chris Green said... % On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 05:13:10PM -0500, Larry P. Schrof wrote: % > % > generic binding seems to be broke. Am I doing something wrong? % > % > bind generic j previous-entry % > bind generic k next-entry % > bind index j noop % > bind index k no

Re: Two "problems" with mutt-1.2

Hall Stevenson proclaimed on mutt-users that: >> Try sendmail_wait=-1 :) > >Thank you ;-) I'll give it a try this afternoon. Can I assume you use >this setting and it *does* work ?? I don't, but Roessler does. $ cat /usr/local/doc/mutt/samples/sample.muttrc-tlr|grep 'sendmail_wait' set send

Re: Two "problems" with mutt-1.2

Hi, folks -- ...and then Hall Stevenson said... % % Error in /home/hall/.muttrc, line 18: <0: invalid value % source: errors in /home/hall/.muttrc % Press any key to continue % % This is the "guilty" line: % % set sendmail_wait=<0 % % Perfectly valid, I thought. Worked fine with 1.0.x. And ev

Re: Two "problems" with mutt-1.2

> Hall Stevenson proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > >> Try sendmail_wait=-1 :) > > > >Thank you ;-) I'll give it a try this afternoon. Can I assume you use > >this setting and it *does* work ?? > > I don't, but Roessler does. > > $ cat /usr/local/doc/mutt/samples/sample.muttrc-tlr|grep 'sendmail_w

Re: Two "problems" with mutt-1.2

...and then Hall Stevenson said... % % Error in /home/hall/.muttrc, line 18: <0: invalid value % source: errors in /home/hall/.muttrc % Press any key to continue % % This is the "guilty" line: % % set sendmail_wait=<0 % % Perfectly valid, I thought. Worked fine with 1.0.x. And even the sample % Mu

Re: maildirs with both mail and other maildirs in them

On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 10:58:16AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > and jim. All the other agents' mail still goes to ~/agents/ but > fred's and jim's mail goes to ~/agents/fred/ and ~/agents/jim/. From > the user's point of view this makes a great deal of sense I think. IMHO agents/fred, agents/jim

Re: maildirs with both mail and other maildirs in them

On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 03:54:26PM +0200, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 10:58:16AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > and jim. All the other agents' mail still goes to ~/agents/ but > > fred's and jim's mail goes to ~/agents/fred/ and ~/agents/jim/. From > > the user's point of

Re: Two "problems" with mutt-1.2

On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 07:44:15AM -0400, Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, the first time I configured mutt, I didn't specify slang or > ncurses, but according to "./configure --help", it will use slang by > default. I'm 99% positive it found it -- would it compile if it didn't > ?

Re: Two "problems" with mutt-1.2

On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 10:39:53AM -0400, Bob Bell wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 07:44:15AM -0400, Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, the first time I configured mutt, I didn't specify slang or > > ncurses, but according to "./configure --help", it will use slang by > > default.

Re: maildirs with both mail and other maildirs in them

Chris -- ...and then Chris Green said... % % It's not unusual to find a number of files and some loose papers in a % section in a filing cabinet, this is analogous. Oh, gawd -- next you'll want a GUI with little drawer icons ;-) % % -- % Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) % Home: [EMAIL PROT

Re: Two "problems" with mutt-1.2

> On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 07:44:15AM -0400, Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, the first time I configured mutt, I didn't specify slang or > > ncurses, but according to "./configure --help", it will use slang by > > default. I'm 99% positive it found it -- would it compile if it di

Re: maildirs with both mail and other maildirs in them

David T-G proclaimed on mutt-users that: >% It's not unusual to find a number of files and some loose papers in a >% section in a filing cabinet, this is analogous. > >Oh, gawd -- next you'll want a GUI with little drawer icons ;-) MacMutt? -- Suresh Ramasubramanian | sureshr at staff.juno.

Re: Two "problems" with mutt-1.2

I sort of caught this discussion in the middle so this has probably already been asked, but does the xterm you are using support color? I argued with mutt for a day and a half until i realized that my xterm was the problem not mutt. Dave On Fri, 19 May 2000, Hall Stevenson wrote: > > On Fri,

Re: fix for redhat 1.2i mutt char encodings

On 2000-05-18 22:46:15 -0500, Carlos Puchol wrote: > redhat released an update, mutt-1.2i-2, but it needs to > have --enable-locales-fix added to the ./prepare line > for accented chars to print (the --with-charmaps option > does not seem to affect at all). There are two things which affect disp

Re: Two "problems" with mutt-1.2

* Suresh Ramasubramanian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000519 03:03]: > Hall Stevenson proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > >set sendmail_wait=<0 > > Try sendmail_wait=-1 :) Cool, that fixed it !! ;-) Thanks ! Hall

Re: Interesting From: header problem

Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 18 May 2000: > Okay.. I've searched the mailing list archives for this, but it seems that > I'm the only person trying to do exactly this, and I can't seem to make > mutt do it. Perhaps some of you out there can help. Maybe. :-) > Basically, I wan

Re: Putting warnings into mutt

Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 19 May 2000: > Is it possible to put warning messages in the status bar > with a macro like "There are no messages." or "You are on the last page." Not as such. You can change the Status bar's format to include any message you like, at any point w

Re: Interesting From: header problem

On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 11:20:09PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 18 May 2000: > > > (2) I'm _replying_ to mail that was sent to a mailing list. This is the > > tough case -- the To: field is some other random address, and the list > > isn'

Re: Two "problems" with mutt-1.2

Mikko -- ...and then Mikko Hänninen said... % David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 19 May 2000: % % > Hall, you've already seen the answer to this, but it's "the value must be % > numeric, not descriptive". % > % > Mutt folks, is this any tougher to fix than the attached patch? We keep

Re: Interesting From: header problem

Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 19 May 2000: > > Nope, sorry. There's been talk of ways to solve this, and I think even > > the best way has been figured out (creating a pseudo-operator which tells > > that the next pattern operator should match against the headers of the > > repl

Re: Two "problems" with mutt-1.2

Mikko -- ...and then Mikko Hänninen said... % David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 19 May 2000: % > % You're not supposed to be patching manual.sgml, manual.txt or % > % manual-6.html -- those file are auto-generated. Instead, a change in % > % the manual.sgml.head or manual.sgml.tail. O

Re: Sender profiles, personalities, setting from address etc.

I think this is a good idea. I will use it. Thanks Martti, Kelly Quoting Martti Rahkila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu May 18, 2000 at 09:44:31AM +0100, Telsa Gwynne muttered: > > > On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 12:38:31PM +0530 or thereabouts, Suresh Ramasubramanian >wrote: > > > Martti Rahkila p

Re: support for compressed folders in 1.2?

It works for compressed mutt mail folders. Then what about the supporting for compressed mail folders in procmail when using mutt? I use procmail to deliver mails to different mail folders. After I've changed the mutt folders to gz format, procmail still delivers mails as uncompressed format,