On 2000-05-10 03:12:28 +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> AFAIK there is no fcc-hook. There is a fcc-save-hook
> which is a save-hook which also sets FCC to the given
> folder while sending mail.
From the muttrc (5) manual page:
save-hook [!]pattern filename
When a message ma
On 2000-05-09 16:14:26 -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> Is this something I can configure without going to the whole SSL thing?
> That is something I'm going to look at in the future, but not just yet...
> Using mutt 1.2, of course...
Try the --with-gss configuration option.
--
http://www.guug.de/
On 2000-05-09 14:58:50 -0700, Evan Vetere wrote:
> pub 1024 0xF012C714 1998-12-17 -- DSS Sign & Encrypt
> sub 2048 0xE883D4B0 1998-12-17 -- Diffie-Hellman
> uid Matt Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (that's to prove to you all that I really do have it in
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 20:55:43 +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> So why didn't you report it with all the details necessary to fix it?
I did, but noone replied. See messages
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Before, I thought that there was a problem with the mail server
I'm receiving the following message from our server when I try to send a
simple HTML attachment. I've put in a trouble report with our computing
folks, but I am wondering if there might be something wrong with my
original message?
Thanks,
-Clint
Mutt 1.1.9i (2000-03-13)
Copyright (C) 1996-2000
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 12:02:21PM -0700, Daniel Chetlin wrote:
[...]
> Item two: I tend to edit my emails once or twice before sending. When I use
> textwidth in vim, it inserts newlines initially, so if I edit the text ends up
> looking very choppy (30 character lines, etc.) and it becomes a pai
On Wednesday, 10 May 2000 at 13:48, Dave (Grizz) Glaser wrote:
> I have soem problems with IMAP in mutt 1.2
>
> Everything seems to be working fine until I try to exit. If I choose to move things
>to my mbox, mutt displays "fetching message." for a long time, then errors out
>and quits. The
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 05:19:47PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote:
> Hello Christian!
>
> On Tue, 09 May 2000, Christian Ordig wrote:
>
> > I start mutt by calling "mutt -y" to see which of my folders has new mail.
> > The format the folders are displayed isn't really what I want...
> > I am not
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 11:53:05PM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I know this would user quite a lot of time parsing the folders, but since
> > I am using Maildir style eMail folders this would be speeded up quite much.
> > Is there any way to achieve this? The docs only tell me about the
> That's not what I'm seeing - my xbiff notification flag goes down as soon
> as mutt(not me) see's that there's new mail. What you describe is what
> I want(I want the xbiff flag to stay up until *I* read the new mail), but
> I'm not sure what's wrong or different about my setup. I have
> proc
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 04:14:11PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Why broken? Do you mean that NFS is broken?
*grin* That's a different story.
What I meant is the fact that the use of differnet locking methods
depending on where a file resides brings additional complexity to a
system, and esse
hi, it appears i the setting of proper mime types does not
work when attaching files. i am attaching two files a ps file and
a gif file. you will see that one comes out as text/plain and the
other as applica/octet-stream.
i have tried with all ~/.mutt* files removed . mine is a regular
redhat 6.2
Mrinal Kalakrishnan saw fit to inform me that:
> My friend has a problem with an old Mutt version (0.95.4i), our
> timezone is +0530, but it displays it as +051800.
> Other than updating mutt, is there any fix for this?
It is a mutt bug afaict. The mutt changelog has a note from Roessler to
tha
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 06:22:06PM -0500,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Kelly Scroggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 09 May 2000:
> > > > > editor="vim -c "set tw=72" +1"
> >
> > > > set editor="vim -c 'set tw=72' +1"
> >
> > > When I remove t
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 04:14:11PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > My personal suggestion would be to use maildir folders
>
> This is what I'll do for incoming mailboxes. Russell Hoover told me
> that according to procmail.org, procmail now supports the maildir
> mailbox format.
>
Yes, it does
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 12:37:45 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Not currently. (Actually, systems which require the use
> of different locking mechanisms for different kinds of
> mail folders sound a bit broken to me.)
Why broken? Do you mean that NFS is broken?
It seems logical to use a faste
2000-05-10-18:37:40 Wilhelm Wienemann:
> %build
> CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -DDL_STANDALONE"
> ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-compressed --with-mixmaster
>--with-charmaps=/usr/share/i18n/charmaps --sysconfdir=%{prefix}/etc
> make keymap_defs.h
> make mutt_dotlock
I didn't see that problem. Bui
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2000.05.10 00.54]:
> Maybe pgpring just fails to find your public key ring.
Nope, pgpring isn't installed; there we go. I'll flog my admin.
Thanks much.
--
- Evan Vetere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | B6B0 5F71 FE5E 0607 4E52 CEAC 1839 2E77 9C35 A263
PGP sig
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 11:32:43 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Maybe certain caching mechanisms are disabled where you
> use mutt. However, we have had reports about substantial
> mail loss which were related to locking problems and NFS
> caching. You really want to invalidate caches, which
>
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 06:50:56PM +0200, Christian Ordig wrote:
> > You have a point here, and that could be a killer feature for mbox
> > format ;-)
> right... but who really uses mbox when it comes to have more than
> 1000 or 2000 messages in a folder?
I do. I've tried Maildirs and found them
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 08:51:41AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-05-10 03:12:28 +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
>
> > AFAIK there is no fcc-hook. There is a fcc-save-hook
> > which is a save-hook which also sets FCC to the given
> > folder while sending mail.
>
> >From the muttrc (5) manua
On 2000-05-10 19:10:38 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> when i switched from mailbox to maildir i used the
> formail-prgram, which is a versatile little
> mail-message formatter from the procmail suite:
If all you want to do is changing folder formats, mutt
itself will be a nice tool.
--
http
How does mutt decide what you get displayed in the browser when you
enter a '?' after a 'c' or an 's'?
I would like to be able to save to a remote IMAP folder by browsing to
the required folder but I can't find a way of getting to see the IMAP
server's directory when issuing the 's' command.
By
Hi,
I've troubles with the imap ssl certificates, saved in the file
certificate_file, which I set to ~/.mutt.certificate_file in my
~/.muttrc. If I do so, I can accept a certificate not only once but
always (otherwise this option isn't available). The certificate is
stored in the file ~/.mutt.cer
* Thomas Ribbrock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000510 06:25]:
> On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 12:02:21PM -0700, Daniel Chetlin wrote:
> [...]
> > Item two: I tend to edit my emails once or twice before sending. When I use
> > textwidth in vim, it inserts newlines initially, so if I edit the text ends up
> > loo
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 05:42:35PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Mutt-1.2 has been released under
Just a little point for the docs:
Within INSTALL there is a reference to the devel list. I think it is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and not an .edu address.
Thanks a lot for the new release. I will try it..
Hello Christian!
On Tue, 09 May 2000, Christian Ordig wrote:
> I start mutt by calling "mutt -y" to see which of my folders has new mail.
> The format the folders are displayed isn't really what I want...
> I am not really interested in permissions or owner of the folders,
> but more in how many
> Thomas Roessler (Wed 10.0500-12:37):
>
> My personal suggestion would be to use maildir folders - a
> simple delivery agent by Dave de Simmone (I think) is in
> the contrib/ area of the FTP site. It should even be
> possible to write one in your favorite shell scripting
> language, or even in
Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 10 May 2000:
> I do. I've tried Maildirs and found them to be slower to open (about
> twice for the first time and only very slightly slower when everything
> is in the cache), bigger (a single folder with 3100 messages took 13 Mb
> in mbox, and 2
Hello,
here I want to compile the recent version of mutt with
'mutt_dotlock'. Unfortunately the compilation will break
with the following messages:
---> cut here < -
+ make mutt_dotlock
gcc -DSHAREDIR=\"/usr/share/mutt\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/usr/etc\"
-DBIND
On 2000-05-10 10:59:10 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I thought it was reliable. I've been using the dotlock
> method (only) for years and AFAIK, I've never had any
> mailbox corruption when it was enabled.
Maybe certain caching mechanisms are disabled where you
use mutt. However, we have had
On 2000-05-10 09:30:08 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I prefer dotlock, because it is faster than fcntl under NFS.
Of course, this gain of speed comes at the cost of
minimized reliability. You don't want to do dotlocking
via NFS.
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
On 2000-05-10 12:05:03 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Well, can I use a locking mechanism with incoming
> mailboxes (fcntl) and another locking mechanism
> (dotlock) with other mailboxes?
Not currently. (Actually, systems which require the use
of different locking mechanisms for different kind
I have soem problems with IMAP in mutt 1.2
Everything seems to be working fine until I try to exit. If I choose to move things to
my mbox, mutt displays "fetching message." for a long time, then errors out and
quits. Then when I open it back up, all of my messages are in my inbox twice.
I
I have some problems with IMAP in mutt 1.2
Everything seems to be working fine until I try to exit. If I choose to move things to
my mbox, mutt displays "fetching message." for a long time, then errors out and
quits. Then when I open it back up, all of my messages are in my inbox twice.
I
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 09:49:03 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Of course, this gain of speed comes at the cost of
> minimized reliability. You don't want to do dotlocking
> via NFS.
I thought it was reliable. I've been using the dotlock method (only)
for years and AFAIK, I've never had any mai
I'm trying to get mutt use MIME to open attachments like M$ Word and M$
Excel using StarOffice. Can somene point me to a good recource on
setting my mutt MIME. thanks
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 12:35:51PM -0500, Carlos Puchol wrote:
> hi, it appears i the setting of proper mime types does not
> work when attaching files. i am attaching two files a ps file and
> a gif file. you will see that one comes out as text/plain and the
> other as applica/octet-stream.
>
>
38 matches
Mail list logo
