On 2000-05-10 10:59:10 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I thought it was reliable. I've been using the dotlock > method (only) for years and AFAIK, I've never had any > mailbox corruption when it was enabled. Maybe certain caching mechanisms are disabled where you use mutt. However, we have had reports about substantial mail loss which were related to locking problems and NFS caching. You really want to invalidate caches, which can't be done by dotlocking files. -- http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
- [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writable /var/mail detection! Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writable /var/mail detect... Lars Hecking
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writable /var/mail de... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writable /var/mai... Thomas Roessler
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writable /var... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writable... Thomas Roessler
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writ... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-... Thomas Roessler
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-... Chris Green
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-... Thomas Roessler
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-... ino-waiting
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-... Thomas Roessler
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writable /var/mail detect... Vincent Lefevre