On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 11:32:43 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Maybe certain caching mechanisms are disabled where you
> use mutt.  However, we have had reports about substantial
> mail loss which were related to locking problems and NFS
> caching.  You really want to invalidate caches, which
> can't be done by dotlocking files.

Well, can I use a locking mechanism with incoming mailboxes (fcntl)
and another locking mechanism (dotlock) with other mailboxes?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> - 100%
validated HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des
Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc.
Computer science / computer arithmetic / Arénaire project at LIP, ENS-Lyon

Reply via email to