On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 11:32:43 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > Maybe certain caching mechanisms are disabled where you > use mutt. However, we have had reports about substantial > mail loss which were related to locking problems and NFS > caching. You really want to invalidate caches, which > can't be done by dotlocking files. Well, can I use a locking mechanism with incoming mailboxes (fcntl) and another locking mechanism (dotlock) with other mailboxes? -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> - 100% validated HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc. Computer science / computer arithmetic / Arénaire project at LIP, ENS-Lyon
- [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writable /var/mail detection! Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writable /var/mail detect... Lars Hecking
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writable /var/mail de... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writable /var/mai... Thomas Roessler
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writable /var... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writable... Thomas Roessler
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writ... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-... Thomas Roessler
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-... Chris Green
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-... Thomas Roessler
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-... ino-waiting
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-... Thomas Roessler
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-... Vincent Lefevre
- Re: [mutt-1.2] Broken world-writable /var/mail detect... Vincent Lefevre