* Lars Hecking ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000327 08:22]:
> Terje Elde writes:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've got a rather nice PGP setup with mutt, using the gpg-2comp prog as shown
> > in the examples (1.1.9i IIRC), however when I'm trying to encrypt to RSA keys,
> > I get the following:
>
> 1.1.9i doesn
Ben Beuchler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> I have searched through the manual and can't seem to track down a way to
> start mutt with threads already collapsed. Perhaps I'm missing something
> elemental about the way mutt works...
Hello,
try this:
folder-hook . push \eV
I don't know version o
Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > I am using mutt 1.1.9i. When using gnupg to verify the
> > > signature, the screen is not properly refreshed. ie. some of the
> > > characters from the index page are still displayed.
> >
> > So you're looking at the index listing and you press SPACE o
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This would be changed if there indeed were a command to change the
> current environment variables, like has been suggested. Maybe for
> 1.3...
I did send out a patch which adds the command "setenv" to Mutt.
Perhaps I should check it still works and ask J
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 06:12:43PM -0500, Fairlight wrote:
>
> I've wished for a gzipped mailbox read feature myself.
I have a shell function that I use as a wrapper around mutt to handle
gzipped mailboxes, but it's rather ugly. I'd much prefer that mutt could
handle it internally.
> However,
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 01:11:58AM +0200, Sebastian Helms wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> * Sam Alleman wrote on 27 Mär 2000:
>
> > I was wondering if there was any simple way to read gzipped mailboxes.
>
> Yes, Roland Rosenfeld has a patch which enables mutt to read, write and
> append to gzipped mailbox
What is the status on the S/MIME implementation
that was mentioned on the list a while ago?
Is it in the current snapshot?
/magnus
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 10:34:24AM +0200, Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE wrote:
> > I have searched through the manual and can't seem to track down a way to
> > start mutt with threads already collapsed. Perhaps I'm missing something
> > elemental about the way mutt works...
>
> Hello,
> try
I am using mutt 1.1.9. I have $mbox set to "=read" and it does indeed
save all read messages there. However, when I attempt to change to that
folder, it just shows me the actual mail file rather then a list of
messages.
Actually, it's doing this with every box except my actual inbox.
I'm using
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 09:38:58PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Terje Elde writes:
> > I've got a rather nice PGP setup with mutt, using the gpg-2comp prog as shown
> > in the examples (1.1.9i IIRC)
Fine.
> 1.1.9i doesn't use gpg-2comp anymore.
If one of the message recipients is using PGP-2,
Speaking of this menu:
I am learning more and more about gnupg everyday and it's integration
with mutt. I am only currently using the standard options file released
with gpg, however last week some mentioned a gnu.rc file sent out with
mutt. I browsed through the file system and found nothing
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 10:09:31AM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
> however last week some mentioned a gnu.rc file sent out with
> mutt. I browsed through the file system and found nothing of the sort.
A gpg.rc is in the contrib directory of the 1.1.x versions, don't know
about a gnu.rc
How might the To: be changed in a reply to a particular address,
other than manually? I'm aware of the send-hook/my_hdr limitation
specified in 3.17 :/
--
Patrick Walsh
Edmonton AB CA
Why does resend-message (ESC-e) not respect $copy? Presumably if
$copy is set, one wants a copy saved, of all messages sent.
(this function is not listed in the 1.1.9i manual.txt)
--
Patrick Walsh
Edmonton AB CA
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:58:06PM -0600, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> I have searched through the manual and can't seem to track down a way to
> start mutt with threads already collapsed.
I use:
folder-hook =.*\.in 'push \eV'
HTH,
--
Alisdair McDiarmid[EMAIL PROTE
I am very happy with my version of mutt 1.0.1i
Is their reason to upgrade, and if I were to, how would I go about it?
I am more familiar with upgrading through rpm packages, but I assume
you go through a standard building of a tarball and the binarys get
written over...
thanks
---
/helfman
2000-03-27-06:06:50 Magnus Stenman:
> What is the status on the S/MIME implementation
> that was mentioned on the list a while ago?
I've not been interested in it much myself, but as best I can recall
from what I saw on the list, S/MIME would be trivial to do, might
not even require any mods to m
Hello,
I'm using mutt 1.0.1i.
Every time i quit a mailbox containing new mails, the "N" flag of this
mailbox is gone (in the mailbox index).
Is there a way to keep this flag, so you can always see in which mailbox
new (or unreaded) mails are (or change it to "O")?
BTW: is it possible to see in t
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000, Bennett Todd wrote:
> 2000-03-27-06:06:50 Magnus Stenman:
> > What is the status on the S/MIME implementation
> > that was mentioned on the list a while ago?
> I've not been interested in it much myself, but as best I can recall
> from what I saw on the list, S/MIME would be
supio writes:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using mutt 1.0.1i.
> Every time i quit a mailbox containing new mails, the "N" flag of this
> mailbox is gone (in the mailbox index).
> Is there a way to keep this flag, so you can always see in which mailbox
> new (or unreaded) mails are (or change it to "O")?
E
Sam --
...and then Sam Alleman said...
% On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 01:11:58AM +0200, Sebastian Helms wrote:
% > Hi Sam,
Yeah, what he said :-)
% >
% > * Sam Alleman wrote on 27 Mär 2000:
% >
% > > I was wondering if there was any simple way to read gzipped mailboxes.
% >
% > http://www.spinna
Mark --
...and then Fairlight said...
% On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 03:32:15AM +0900, Sam Alleman thus spoke:
% >
% > In fact, if mutt could handle some sort of encrypted mailbox seamlessly
% > that would be *EXCEPTIONALLY* cool! Pgp encrypted mailboxes would be
% > fantastic. Thanks in advance for
Ben --
...and then Ben Beuchler said...
% I am using mutt 1.1.9. I have $mbox set to "=read" and it does indeed
% save all read messages there. However, when I attempt to change to that
That's good; it's behaving :-)
% folder, it just shows me the actual mail file rather then a list of
% mes
Marc / supio --
...and then supio said...
% Hello,
Hi there!
%
% I'm using mutt 1.0.1i.
% Every time i quit a mailbox containing new mails, the "N" flag of this
% mailbox is gone (in the mailbox index).
Well, that's the function of quit as defined by default, so the
developers are pretty hap
Jason --
...and then Jason Helfman said...
% I am very happy with my version of mutt 1.0.1i
Glad to hear it! So are lots of folks, in fact :-)
%
% Is their reason to upgrade, and if I were to, how would I go about it?
There's always a reason to upgrade :-) I haven't checked the NEWS fil
Patrick --
...and then Patrick Walsh said...
% Why does resend-message (ESC-e) not respect $copy? Presumably if
% $copy is set, one wants a copy saved, of all messages sent.
While I accept your argument, I think that the general premise is that
you already have a copy of the message (since you'
I think this is a mutt question and not a gnome-terminal question, but
please correct me if I'm wrong.
When I run mutt in a normal xterm, composing a new message (in emacs
via emacsclient) leaves whatever I was viewing in mutt intact until I
tell emacs I'm done.
When I run mutt in gnome-terminal
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 07:05:24PM +0200, supio ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using mutt 1.0.1i.
> Every time i quit a mailbox containing new mails, the "N" flag of this
> mailbox is gone (in the mailbox index).
> Is there a way to keep this flag, so you can always see in which mailb
Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I am very happy with my version of mutt 1.0.1i
>
> Is their reason to upgrade, and if I were to, how would I go about it?
> I am more familiar with upgrading through rpm packages, but I assume
> you go through a standard building of a tarball and the
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:11:49AM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote:
> I am very happy with my version of mutt 1.0.1i
> Is their reason to upgrade, and if I were to, how would I go about it?
In this case, why do think about upgrading?
> I am more familiar with upgrading through rpm packages, but I a
is it possible to use mutzilla for netscape for use for mail (mutt) and
news (trn) or can only slrn be used???
also can it only be used for only news, or only mail
i have tried to get it to only use mail, but unsuccessfull...I want to
use it for both, though.
---
/helfman
"At any
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 02:08:24PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % Every time i quit a mailbox containing new mails, the "N" flag of this
> % mailbox is gone (in the mailbox index).
>
> Well, that's the function of quit as defined by default, so the
> developers are pretty happy with your statement :
Hello,
I was wondering if it's possible to build mutt outside the source
tree. Starting doing it I created a directory called `build-mutt'
somewhere on my system and ran `/path/to/mutt-1.1.9/configure' with
it's options, which semmed to work properly. But make stopped with the
following output:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 07:05:24PM +0200, supio wrote:
> I'm using mutt 1.0.1i.
> Every time i quit a mailbox containing new mails, the "N" flag of this
> mailbox is gone (in the mailbox index).
> Is there a way to keep this flag, so you can always see in which mailbox
> new (or unreaded) mails ar
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 09:28:46AM -0700, Patrick Walsh wrote:
> How might the To: be changed in a reply to a particular address,
> other than manually? I'm aware of the send-hook/my_hdr limitation
> specified in 3.17 :/
This can't be done. There is no way to get it to modify either the to:
or
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 07:05:24PM +0200, supio wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using mutt 1.0.1i.
> Every time i quit a mailbox containing new mails, the "N" flag of this
> mailbox is gone (in the mailbox index).
> Is there a way to keep this flag, so you can always see in which mailbox
> new (or unread
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 02:28:57PM -0800, Michael Elkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 09:28:46AM -0700, Patrick Walsh wrote:
> > How might the To: be changed in a reply to a particular address,
> > other than manually? I'm aware of the send-hook/my_hdr limitation
> > specif
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 02:12:17PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
[...]
> If you want to wait for 1.2 (the next stable release, for which 1.1.9 is
> a candidate), then [I understand that] you can expect to see RPMs and
[...]
Yes, I'm pretty certain there will be RPMs of 1.2 once (well, better: a
short
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 27 Mar 2000:
> While I accept your argument, I think that the general premise is that
> you already have a copy of the message (since you're resending it) and
> you're not making any changes (like adding the recipient to the headers)
> and so a copy woul
supio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 27 Mar 2000:
> But the real problem seems to be myself describing my wishes .
I dunno, I thought "in the mailbox index" was clear enough...
(As opposed to "message index".) Even if I admit it could be
interpreted either way.
> So mutt only looks on the ti
Ben Beuchler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 27 Mar 2000:
> I am using mutt 1.1.9. I have $mbox set to "=read" and it does indeed
> save all read messages there. However, when I attempt to change to that
> folder, it just shows me the actual mail file rather then a list of
> messages.
Do you
Okay. Stupid user question time. I say this because I'm sure the answer
is something simple like "install this" or "set that" or something like
that ... or worse yet, RTFM. I just can't figure it out. So, here goes:
Every now and then, I get an email with no body. It just says,
[-- application/p
I notice then when pgp-signing something a mail message, I need to enter
my password, respectively. However, if I send another message,
pgp-signing, again. There is no need to enter my password. Is this being
passed to a temp file?
--
/helfman
"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to t
* Jon Walthour ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000328 08:59]:
> Okay. Stupid user question time. I say this because I'm sure the answer
> is something simple like "install this" or "set that" or something like
> that ... or worse yet, RTFM. I just can't figure it out. So, here goes:
>
> Every now and then,
Marc --
...and then supio said...
% On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 02:08:24PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > % Every time i quit a mailbox containing new mails, the "N" flag of this
% > % mailbox is gone (in the mailbox index).
% >
% > Well, that's the function of quit as defined by default, so the
% > de
45 matches
Mail list logo
