Re: mailbox is read only and also how can I set up quotas?

This thread doesn't belong to postfix-users at all, but to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To and Mail-Followup-To headers set. On 2000-03-07 17:40:35 +1100, Jeremy Lunn wrote: >> check permission of /var/spool/mail (or /var/mail), >> when you're trying to open your mailbox your mail >> application sho

Automatically have a default body?

Hi, I have a situation for which I'd like possible solution suggestions. Basically, I'm the list admin of a Majordomo-managed mailing list and I'm often sending in administrative unsubscribe requests to majordomo. It would be nice if I could have in the edit buffer already a ready-made "unsubscri

Re: Automatically have a default body?

2000-03-06-22:21:42 Mikko Hänninen: > So, any solutions to this -- how could I have a default body text when > sending email to this particular address? How about using edit_hdrs, and having $EDITOR be a script that checks the buffer it's pointed at, and if it contains the magic addr in the heade

attachments appear as NoName

Hello, At the company where I work, it seems that most people are using dtmail or netscape mail. When I send mail with attachments from mutt, the attachments appear in those other mail clients as "NoName". I can't figure this out. The attachments appear just fine in the Bcc: copy of the mail t

Re: attachments appear as NoName

> At the company where I work, it seems that most people are using > dtmail or netscape mail. > > When I send mail with attachments from mutt, the attachments appear > in those other mail clients as "NoName". If these attachments do not have a Content-Disposition filename= field, this would

Re: Automatically have a default body?

On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 05:21:42AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Hi, > > I have a situation for which I'd like possible solution suggestions. > Basically, I'm the list admin of a Majordomo-managed mailing list and > I'm often sending in administrative unsubscribe requests to majordomo. Although

problems mapping functions at startup

Mutt version is 1.1.1i running on Linux... I have the following in my ~/.muttrc: bindpager "\ct" tag-thread bindindex "\et" untag-thread when I start mutt I get this: [dmonjar@monjard ~]$ mutt Error in /home/dmonjar/.muttrc, line 361: tag-thread: no such function in map Error i

Re: Automatically have a default body?

I started to write an e-mail to this effect almost a year ago. How hard would it be to abstract the postpose message code, so that you coudl for instance call a quick open of a mailbox and then select a message to reedit from it. randy > Another method I thought which would be nice would be if t

Re: Automatically have a default body?

On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 05:05:11PM -0500, Randall J . Million wrote: > I started to write an e-mail to this effect almost a year ago. How hard > would it be to abstract the postpose message code, so that you coudl for > instance call a quick open of a mailbox and then select a message to > reedit

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.8 is out

Hi Eugene! > :Mutt-1.1.8 is out. This is another BETA version. Changes > :against 1.1.7 include fixes for one recent and one > :long-standing, but mostly unnoticed bug. > > Just a quick observation. Mutt is one of the few pieces of software > that gets full version numbers for betas, versus m

Re: Automatically have a default body?

michael d. ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 07 Mar 2000: > 1) write the boilerplate message > 2) postpone it > 3) c =postponed > 4) save the file to =boilerplates or something > 5) c =boilerplates > 6) pick the message > 7) esc-e is bound by default to resend-message > > does that work? No

Re: Automatically have a default body?

On 2000-03-07 17:05:11 -0500, Randall J . Million wrote: > I started to write an e-mail to this effect almost a > year ago. How hard would it be to abstract the postpose > message code, so that you coudl for instance call a > quick open of a mailbox and then select a message to > reedit from it.