Re: mutt/gpg crashes Outlook 2000?

1999-12-27 Thread bruno
On Fri, Dec 24, 1999 at 06:36:06PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm using Mutt 1.0i and gpg 1.0.0 and I'm signing everything I send, > this was a simple text mail with no attachments. I can confirm that a 'normal' unsigned mail didn't crash Outlook and another signed one crashed his sys-adm

Re: priority header

1999-12-27 Thread David T-G
Thomas, et al -- ...and then Thomas Roessler said... % On 1999-12-23 19:44:31 -0500, David T-G wrote: % % > What priority or importance headers does mutt recognize? % % None. Hmmph... % % However, with unstable, you could use some scoring rules to % automatically flag certain messages as im

Re: mutt/gpg crashes Outlook 2000?

1999-12-27 Thread David T-G
Bruno -- ...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said... % On Fri, Dec 24, 1999 at 06:36:06PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: % > I'm using Mutt 1.0i and gpg 1.0.0 and I'm signing everything I send, % > this was a simple text mail with no attachments. I can't sign mail sent to LookOut! lusers because the

PGP v6 w/ mutt 1.0i?

1999-12-27 Thread Caldwell Warley
Can someone confirm for me that PGP v6 works with Mutt 1.0i? PGP is working fine for me, but when I am in Mutt, and I try to "sign as", I get a message stating, "Cannot open your secret Key ring!" Maybe some environment variable for Mutt is not set? -- ---

Re: mutt/gpg crashes Outlook 2000?

1999-12-27 Thread bruno
On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 07:58:17AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > I can't sign mail sent to LookOut! lusers because they then can't quote > properly (it appears that OE won't quote attachments). Ah, that explains why they always quote after the sig. I wondered why people did that. > Have you tried wi

Re: priority header

1999-12-27 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-12-27 07:55:12 -0500, David T-G wrote: > Hokay. Since I know nothing about scoring and haven't looked at > the unstable branch, do you think that I could score messages > based on a header (Priority: or Importance:) and then make that > entry in the index be reverse color (since I just u

Re: mutt/gpg crashes Outlook 2000?

1999-12-27 Thread Mikko Hänninen
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 27 Dec 1999: > ...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said... > % Can anyone suggest a filter to not sign messages in reply-to messages > % with this in the header: > % > % > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) > > Now that's a good one

Re: mutt/gpg crashes Outlook 2000?

1999-12-27 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 23:24 +0200 27 Dec 1999, Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder if some sort of reply-hook would be needed in Mutt? Ie. The idea has been brought up before. > send-hooks would remain as they are, but when replying, the > message-being-replied to is checked against reply-hooks f

Re: mutt/gpg crashes Outlook 2000?

1999-12-27 Thread Duncan Watson
On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 11:24:29PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 27 Dec 1999: > > ...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said... > > % Can anyone suggest a filter to not sign messages in reply-to messages > > % with this in the header: > > % > > % > X-Mailer:

Re: mutt/gpg crashes Outlook 2000?

1999-12-27 Thread rex
On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 06:26:41PM -0800, Duncan Watson wrote: > > The problems are many but at least from session to session you should > be protecting outlook users. The biggest problem is during a session > when you receive new mail from an outlook user not in your oudb. They > might