On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 06:26:41PM -0800, Duncan Watson wrote:
>
> The problems are many but at least from session to session you should
> be protecting outlook users. The biggest problem is during a session
> when you receive new mail from an outlook user not in your oudb. They
> might get mail from you that would crash their machines. As a side
> benefit mail initially from you to an outlook user would still not be
> signed.
No offense, but if Outlook crashes the lame M$ OS when it receives RFC
822 compliant mail, why should we be concerned? Rather than try to
code a workaround, wouldn't it be best to show the world that M$
employs incompetent programmers who can't code standards on the rare
occasions when they attempt to do so?
-rex
--
You can lead a horticulture, but you can't make her think.
