On Mon, Dec 27, 1999 at 11:24:29PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 27 Dec 1999:
> > ...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
> > % Can anyone suggest a filter to not sign messages in reply-to messages
> > % with this in the header:
> > % 
> > % > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
> > 
> > Now that's a good one...  I won't try that one but I'll watch to see what
> > someone (mikko? sec? :-) dreams up...
> 
> I wish I could help, but I don't think it's possible.
> 
> You can change the relevant values with send-hooks, but send-hooks only
> act on the new message, not the headers or content of the message that's
> being replied to.  So you can choose not to sign based on recipient
> address, but not based on a header in the original message.
> 
> So if you can't use send-hooks, there would be need to be some other
> kind of hook or condition that would be invoked, but I can't think of
> anything else that would act per-message.  I suppose it might be
> possible somehow to re-bind all (?) the movement keys so that they'd
> set the variables correctly as you moved to each message, but that's
> a pretty horrible solution even as far as kludges go. :-)  Even if it's
> possible, and I'm not sure about that.
> 

What this kind of kludge:
        1. .mutt/sendhooks.rc is sourced in your muttrc.
        2. identify the evil headers in procmail
        3. pass the message from outlook through a filter program ala
                lbdb.
        4. this filter oudb keeps a list of users who are outlook
                users and makes sure to eliminate duplicates.
        5. if a new user is added then a send-hook is appended to
                .mutt/sendhooks.rc
        
The problems are many but at least from session to session you should
be protecting outlook users.  The biggest problem is during a session
when you receive new mail from an outlook user not in your oudb.  They 
might get mail from you that would crash their machines.  As a side
benefit mail initially from you to an outlook user would still not be 
signed.

I might try to do this with a python script for the filter since I am
in the process of learning python.

> [SNIP]
> 
> Mikko

/Duncan

PS. I am having problems with windows users and my gpg signing as
well.  If you see any problems with my gpg sig please inform me.

-- 
Duncan Watson             oOoOo It is pitch black.  You are likely to oOoOo  
Unix Sysadmin at Large     oOoOo         be eaten by a grue.         oOoOo  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]               oOoOo                                   oOoOo  
Portland, OR                 oOoOo                                 oOoOo

PGP signature

Reply via email to