Re: send-hook question

1999-08-06 Thread Christian Schult
Salvatore Greco wrote: > I am having a syntax hassle with my send-hooks after and upgrade. > > Below is a snippet of some of my send-hooks > > -- [send-hooks from .muttrc] > > send-hook '~A' 'set signature=~/.signature; my_hdr From: Salvatore Greco ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAI

Changing mailbox (tab-tab-tab-oops)

1999-08-06 Thread torben fjerdingstad
Note: You will need qmail maildirs and a mailboxes line in .muttrc to understand my questions below. I get a list of all my (qmail) maildirs by pressing 'c' and then three tabs. Now, the cursor is at the number 1 maildir (the one at the top). First question: How do I sort the listing to the same

tag-reply and In-Reply-To:

1999-08-06 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Hi, folks -- I would think that tagging multiple messages and replying would put multiple message-id in the In-Reply-To: field for proper threading, but it seems (as I see with edit-hdrs) that only the first one (perhaps as sorted in my index) is referenced. On the other hand, I thought that I h

Re: tag-reply and In-Reply-To:

1999-08-06 Thread Wolfgang W. Baumann
Referring to David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Aug 06, 1999: | I would think that tagging multiple messages and replying would | put multiple message-id in the In-Reply-To: field for proper | threading, but it seems (as I see with edit-hdrs) that only the first | one (perhaps as sort

Re: removing a color entry

1999-08-06 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 22:59:35 +0200, Stefan Troeger wrote: > What a about something like > > folder-hook . "" > folder-hook the_folder "color body white black regexp" > > ? This doesn't work. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - PhD student in Computer Science Web:

Re: tag-reply and In-Reply-To:

1999-08-06 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 06:54 -0400 06 Aug 1999, David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would think that tagging multiple messages and replying would > put multiple message-id in the In-Reply-To: field for proper > threading, but it seems (as I see with edit-hdrs) that only the first > one (perhaps as

Re: removing a color entry

1999-08-06 Thread Stefan Troeger
Hi, On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 15:18 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > What a about something like > > > > folder-hook . "" > > folder-hook the_folder "color body white black regexp" > > This doesn't work. Why not? I just tried this folder-hook . "color body blue white ." fol

editing a message

1999-08-06 Thread erik
hi, here is another easy question. I want to edit a message i have saved in a mail box (for example a joke or some kind of forward). I want to get rid of all of the extra headers and such. I use the 'e' key, but it brings up my editor and wants to resend the message. I just want to edit the b

Re: removing a color entry

1999-08-06 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 16:49:21 +0200, Stefan Troeger wrote: > folder-hook . "color body blue white ." > folder-hook Inbox "color body white black ." > > It worked. No. Quoted text is no longer colored. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - PhD student in Computer Science Web: <

reply-to-sender ?

1999-08-06 Thread E Forrest Carpenter
Caveat: This may be in the FAQ/Manual and I overlooked it. Situation: A particular mailing list sets a Reply-To: of the list address, so that replies are pointed back to the list. If I set reply_to=ask-yes, then I can either reply to the list, or to the sender at my discretion. However, 99% of t

Re: editing a message

1999-08-06 Thread Mikko Hänninen
erik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 06 Aug 1999: > I use the 'e' key, but > it brings up my editor and wants to resend the message. I just want > to edit the bosy - and possibly the subject line and then save it back > to my mailbox to send later or just keep. Is there a way to do this? Sel

Re: reply-to-sender ?

1999-08-06 Thread Lars Hecking
E Forrest Carpenter writes: > Caveat: This may be in the FAQ/Manual and I overlooked it. > > Situation: A particular mailing list sets a Reply-To: of the list address, > so that replies are pointed back to the list. If I set reply_to=ask-yes, > then I can either reply to the list, or to the send

Re: send-hook question

1999-08-06 Thread David DeSimone
Christian Schult <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > send-hook '~A' '[...]' > > I'd suggest using . instead of ~A. The dot specifies a default when > no other pattern matches. ~A means "all mail" and later patterns will > not match. Where did you get this information? As far as I'm aware, '.' a

Re: reply-to-sender ?

1999-08-06 Thread David DeSimone
E Forrest Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Situation: A particular mailing list sets a Reply-To: of the list > address, so that replies are pointed back to the list. You can tell Mutt about the mailing list using the 'lists' command, and 'set ignore_list_reply_to', so that Mutt will ign

Re: reply-to-sender ?

1999-08-06 Thread E Forrest Carpenter
> > > Situation: A particular mailing list sets a Reply-To: of the list > > > address, so that replies are pointed back to the list. > > > > You can tell Mutt about the mailing list using the 'lists' command, and > > 'set ignore_list_reply_to', so that Mutt will ignore the Reply-To if it > > po

Re: reply-to-sender ?

1999-08-06 Thread E Forrest Carpenter
> > Caveat: This may be in the FAQ/Manual and I overlooked it. > > > > Situation: A particular mailing list sets a Reply-To: of the list address, > > so that replies are pointed back to the list. If I set reply_to=ask-yes, > > then I can either reply to the list, or to the sender at my discretio

Re: reply-to-sender ?

1999-08-06 Thread E Forrest Carpenter
> > Situation: A particular mailing list sets a Reply-To: of the list > > address, so that replies are pointed back to the list. > > You can tell Mutt about the mailing list using the 'lists' command, and > 'set ignore_list_reply_to', so that Mutt will ignore the Reply-To if it > points to a ma

Re: jSig

1999-08-06 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-08-04 20:43:06 -0700, Azeem Shahjahan Jiva wrote: > Java for a little random sig thing! Wow talk about over kill! Try > this... Would you please announce this to freshmeat, too? SCNR, tlr

forward email as attachment?

1999-08-06 Thread Robert Chien
Hi, Sometimes I need to forward one or more emails to another worker as attachment(s). How do I do that in mutt? If I save it to a file, then attach that file, it sort of works but takes a lot of time, esp. if I'm attaching 3+ emails. Would be nice if I can presss , and choose files or emails to

Re: forward email as attachment?

1999-08-06 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 14:50 -0700 06 Aug 1999, Robert Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > emails. Would be nice if I can presss , and choose files > or emails to attach. This is my wish list item. Well, you can already choose files to attach with 'a'. Would you settle for using 'A' (the default binding for the atta

Re: forward email as attachment?

1999-08-06 Thread Rob Reid
At 5:50 PM EDT on August 6 Robert Chien sent off: > Sometimes I need to forward one or more emails to another > worker as attachment(s). How do I do that in mutt? Tag the messages you want to forward then ";f" (tag-forward) will put them all in your editor for sending. If you want them as sepa

Re: forward email as attachment?

1999-08-06 Thread Gero Treuner
Hi! On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 02:50:11PM -0700, Robert Chien wrote: > If I save it to a file, then attach that file, it sort of > works but takes a lot of time, esp. if I'm attaching 3+ > emails. Would be nice if I can presss , and choose files > or emails to attach. This is my wish list item. Alm

Re: forward email as attachment?

1999-08-06 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Robert Chien [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Sometimes I need to forward one or more emails to another > worker as attachment(s). How do I do that in mutt? > > If I save it to a file, then attach that file, it sort of > works but takes a lot of time, esp. if I'm attaching 3+ > emails. Would be nice

Re: forward email as attachment? (possible bug found!)

1999-08-06 Thread Robert Chien
On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 12:00:12AM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 02:50:11PM -0700, Robert Chien wrote: > > If I save it to a file, then attach that file, it sort of > > works but takes a lot of time, esp. if I'm attaching 3+ > > emails. Would be nice if I can presss

urlview and launching with lynx

1999-08-06 Thread Brian E. Lavender
>From what I saw with urlview it is now separate from mutt, but I was hoping someone out there is using it with mutt and can answer this question. I just installed urlview on my system and I am wondering what to put in my ~/.urlview file so it will use lynx to open http files. I tried the followi