On Feb19, 23:11PM, Andre Majorel wrote:
> On 2002-02-17 22:27 -0600, Peter Horst wrote:
>
> > Can the vvv.nntp package be used with a local spool, à la slrn/slrnpull?
> > I just patched 1.3.25i with it, and it's great, but it would be better
> > without the slow Internet article checking, etc.
>
On 2002-02-17 22:27 -0600, Peter Horst wrote:
> Can the vvv.nntp package be used with a local spool, à la slrn/slrnpull?
> I just patched 1.3.25i with it, and it's great, but it would be better
> without the slow Internet article checking, etc.
I'm quite interested in slrnpull support too. I use
On Feb18, 13:49PM, William Guynes wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 10:27:40PM -0600, Peter Horst wrote:
> > Can the vvv.nntp package be used with a local spool, ? la
> > slrn/slrnpull? I just patched 1.3.25i with it, and it's great,
> > but it would be better without the slow Internet article che
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 10:27:40PM -0600, Peter Horst wrote:
> Can the vvv.nntp package be used with a local spool, ? la
> slrn/slrnpull? I just patched 1.3.25i with it, and it's great,
> but it would be better without the slow Internet article checking,
> etc.
You're farther along them me. Thi
Hi Peter,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 10:27:40PM -0600 Peter Horst wrote:
> Can the vvv.nntp package be used with a local spool, à la slrn/slrnpull?
> I just patched 1.3.25i with it, and it's great, but it would be better
> without the slow Internet article checking, etc.
I don't know wether it work
Can the vvv.nntp package be used with a local spool, à la slrn/slrnpull?
I just patched 1.3.25i with it, and it's great, but it would be better
without the slow Internet article checking, etc.
Also, is there a more appropriate forum for this question? It seems
strange that so much work should be
