t; > I'm using 1.14.6 and I just had a very strange experience trying to
> > compose a mail. I wanted to send it to someone whose name begins
> > with 'T' and to include his name before his address.
> >
> > So I typed M to compose mail and at the prompt fo
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 11:30:41PM +0100, Ken wrote in
<20200819223041.GA3595@llamedos.localdomain>:
Does the problem occur when you change the name to anything else? And what
if you send an email to your own email address but with their name?
Tried the real name with my address, it took the s
Hi,
I'm using 1.14.6 and I just had a very strange experience trying to
compose a mail. I wanted to send it to someone whose name begins
with 'T' and to include his name before his address.
So I typed M to compose mail and at the prompt for To: I typed his
name and address, some
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:49:22PM +0100, Ken wrote in
<20200819154922.GA23819@llamedos.localdomain>:
I'm using 1.14.6 and I just had a very strange experience trying to
compose a mail. I wanted to send it to someone whose name begins
with 'T' and to include his name befo
Just noticed an interesting phenomena. I was asked about a several-day-long
thread whose most recent message was yesterday, wanted to find the thread
beginning, so I switched to 'd' order, found the most recent message, and
switched to 't' order while on that message; mut
On 13.04.14 22:00, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> Again I hit "r" instead of "L", sorry
Ulrich, in the last two posts you are also somehow stripping the normal
"In-Reply-To:" and "References:" headers, thus ripping those replies out
of the thread. The subject line is also changed, thus defeating mutt's
p
Again I hit "r" instead of "L", sorry
So here again:
- Forwarded message from Ulrich Lauther -
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:37:00PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2014-04-13, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
>
> > BTW, in my current environment - Ubuntu 12.4 - pressing F1 does NOT
> > bring up the
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 09:23:07AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > So index_format is there, alternates not.
> >
> > If a complete list exists somewhere, I was not able to find it.
>
> If you would read the "
>
> see: 11. Alternative addresses
> http://mutt-ng.berlios.de/manual/ch03s11.html
Hello, all,
I've set most colors in mutt to red on black (for night vision
reasons), when I start mutt directly by
$ mutt
I get http://tx0.org/2qx but when I open it 'in a new tab' in screen via
$ screen -t 'mutt' mutt
I get the expected http://tx0.org/2qy
What
0n Sun, May 06, 2007 at 08:38:43AM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
>On Sunday, May 6 at 08:44 PM, quoth Wilkinson, Alex:
>> I'm not sure if this is the best way to test from the CLI,
>
>It is.
>
>> but as you can see t-prot doesn'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, May 6 at 08:44 PM, quoth Wilkinson, Alex:
> I'm not sure if this is the best way to test from the CLI,
It is.
> but as you can see t-prot doesn't seem to alter the message at all.
Aha! Well, there you have it; not a mut
0n Sun, May 06, 2007 at 02:34:42PM +0200, M. Fioretti wrote:
>Very likely, it is a path problem. Instead of just t-prot, try to use:
>set display_filter='/the/complete/path/where/you/placed/t-prot... etc"
set display_filter='/usr/local/bin/t-prot -acelmtS -
On Sun, May 06, 2007 20:01:15 PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> However, addng the following to my mutt config seems have no
> effect what so ever on any messages.
>
> set display_filter='t-prot -acelmtS -Mmutt --spass'
>
> Can someone plea
Hi all,
I am *really* wanting to use t-prot [http://www.escape.de/~tolot/mutt/].
However, addng the following to my mutt config seems have no
effect what so ever on any messages.
set display_filter='t-prot -acelmtS -Mmutt --spass'
Can someone please assist me with confirming wh
Hello,
On 05 Sep 2002, Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I use it, I like it, but the version I'm using has two "flaws".
Which version do you use?
> - messages forwarded from say, Outlook, will be hidden
>
> - messages from Outlook users who try to respond to quoted material
* Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020905 12:32]:
> Anyone have any experience using t-prot? I saw it in the Debian
> archives, and it looks like an interesting filter for TOFU and unwanted
> footers, etc.
I use it, I like it, but the version I'm using has two "flaw
Anyone have any experience using t-prot? I saw it in the Debian
archives, and it looks like an interesting filter for TOFU and unwanted
footers, etc.
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
msg30706/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mike --
...and then mike ledoux said...
%
% -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
% Hash: SHA1
%
% On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:34:04PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > AFAICT, be it good or bad overall, there is no way to have gpg *not* read
% > the default pubring and secring files; that works
because
it also seems to read them first (instead of, say, last). The answer for
me is simply to comment out those lines and voila! I have verified
messages and 'S' in my index display.
Now to get back to our regularly scheduled debugging (of *mutt*, I mean).
:-D
--
David T-G
cool; another one. Thanks!
%
% --
% timothy lupfer
% http://sadlittleboy.com
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/d
* tim lupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-20 15:24]:
> * thus spaketh Shawn McMahon (Mar 20 at 12:48PM):
>
> > begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 12:39:23PM -0500:
>
> >> HTH & HAND and none of this is tested :-)
>
> > Acron
* tim lupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-20 21:25]:
> $ /usr/games/wtf HAND
> HAND: have a nice day
why not read up on the jargon file?
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/
Sven [but that won't help you
understanding D-T-G though]
* thus spaketh Shawn McMahon (Mar 20 at 12:48PM):
> begin quoting what David T-G said on Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 12:39:23PM -0500:
>> HTH & HAND and none of this is tested :-)
> Acronymize that last one. :-)
i'm not sure where else you can acquire it, but /usr/games/wtf t
delete-subthreaddelete all messages in the current subthread
> ESC u undelete-subthread undelete all messages in the current subthread
> ESC n next-subthread jump to the start of the next subthread
> ESC p previous-subthread jump to the start of the prev
n
> > > in "help" in pager context, only "tag-message". are you sure that,
> > > by chance you didn't see "tag-thread" in index context?
> >
> > You are right. t is not bound to pager by default. And that's why I
> > have to
Ah... I see. Thank you all.
The misunderstanding came from that I used to call the screen triggered
by '?' "help", and call the very long file manual.txt "manual".
Now I take Benjamin's macro for my need. Thanks.
But, BTW, it should be instead of in the macro.
best regards,
charlie
On Sun,
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 09:08:41AM +0200, Holger Lillqvist wrote:
> It seems you didn't understand parv's comment. The function tag-thread
> isn't available in the pager. So it is pointless to try to bind a
> non-existent function to a key...
Yes, but you could write a macro to quit the pager tha
sure that,
> > by chance you didn't see "tag-thread" in index context?
>
> You are right. t is not bound to pager by default. And that's why I
> have to bind it by myself here. :-)
It seems you didn't understand parv's comment. The function tag-thread
isn't available in the pager. So it is pointless to try to bind a
non-existent function to a key...
HL
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 09:46:11PM -0500, parv wrote:
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> wrote Charles Jie thusly...
> >
> ...
> > I tried:
> >
> > bind pager t tag-thread
> >
> > I tried again:
> >
> > macro pager t tag-thr
well home and end are bound as well, but neither of those have worked in a long time.
* parv ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> wrote Charles Jie thusly...
> >
> ...
> > I tried:
> >
> > bind pager t tag-thread
> >
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Charles Jie thusly...
>
...
> I tried:
>
> bind pager t tag-thread
>
> I tried again:
>
> macro pager t tag-thread
>
> . It got wrong action though I can see it right with '?'.
> . It just
Hi,
I'd like the 'ESC t' or meta-key alt-t in pager bound to tag-thread as
in index menu. But I failed.
I tried:
bind pager t tag-thread
. There is an error. It may be because it's not a single key.
. But there is no description about how to name such keys
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:50:25PM +0100, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> I already tried this. It seems only to be effective at the To:
> prompt at the initial send-menu if autoedit is unset.
> But it seems to have no effect in the compose menu.
It's because there is a chicken-and-egg problem. send-hoo
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 09:13:07AM -0600, Knute wrote:
>
> Try this:
> send-hook . 'set record=+sent'
I already tried this. It seems only to be effective at the To:
prompt at the initial send-menu if autoedit is unset.
But it seems to have no effect in the compose menu.
Aliases are reeval
; I have:
>
> set default_hook="~t %s"
> send-hook . set record=+sent
>
> Is there another default hook?
>
> -Hanpseter
Try this:
send-hook . 'set record=+sent'
--
Knute
You live, You die. Enjoy the interval!
-- Clarence
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:46:32PM -0600, Knute wrote:
>
> Don't you have to define a default hook in the config file before you
> call the send-hook so that mutt knows what it needs to look at first?
I have:
set default_hook="~t %s"
send-hook . set record
On Tue, 08 Jan 2002, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
>
> It seems to me send-hook ~t is not working with autoedit and
> edit_headers set.
> Only the answer from the initial send-menu seems to be considered.
> Changes from the invoked editor and the compose menu don't seem to
> hav
On Jan 8, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> Why not reevaluate the send-hooks after the editing session and after
> changing the recipient in the compose menu?
For instance, send-hooks can be used to insert different signatures
matching certain addresses (inserting sigs in different languages,
etc.). Re-
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:03:19PM +0200, Holger Lillqvist wrote:
> On Jan 8, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> > It seems to me send-hook ~t is not working with autoedit and
> > edit_headers set.
>
> > This is a bug, isn't it?
>
> Why should it be considered a bug?
On Jan 8, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> It seems to me send-hook ~t is not working with autoedit and
> edit_headers set.
> This is a bug, isn't it?
Why should it be considered a bug? Autoedit per definition skips
the send-menu, and as the recipient is still unknown when you enter
th
It seems to me send-hook ~t is not working with autoedit and
edit_headers set.
Only the answer from the initial send-menu seems to be considered.
Changes from the invoked editor and the compose menu don't seem to
have any effect.
This is a bug, isn't it?
-Hanspeter
xcellent. Thanks for pointing that out.
--=20
Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's subliminal thought is:
--19HmC3QOnaNVzKTI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE7ppcTzRUP82sZFCcRAmW/A
Hi Piet,
* Piet Delport <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09/16/01 05:47]:
> A temporary workaround is something like this:
>
> macro pager \ec "" "tag the current thread"
>
> I use a similar macro to do a sync-mailbox from the pager.
You no longer need this with 1.3.22.1i, you can now sync from the pager.
--JBi0ZxuS5uaEhkUZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001 at 09:26:48 -0400, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Olaf Schulz said...
[...]
> % But (at least in mutt 12.5i) trying to type '
Olaf, et al --
...and then Olaf Schulz said...
% On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 07:08:46AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > I'd think that it's because you'd want to tag a whole thread only from
% > the index, since you [probably] can't get a picture of the whole threa
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:54:45PM +0200, Olaf Schulz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 07:08:46AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> > ...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
> > % Hello
> > % The t toggle thread tagging only works when only the index
> >
> > I'd think
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 07:08:46AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
> % Hello
> % The t toggle thread tagging only works when only the index
>
> I'd think that it's because you'd want to tag a whole thread only from
> the index,
Cliff --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
% Hello
% The t toggle thread tagging only works when only the index
Er, toggle-thread? I have that as 'tag-thread' in my keybindings...
% is displayed, not if you have the index above and a message
% below in the screen.
Right; it'
Hello
The t toggle thread tagging only works when only the index
is displayed, not if you have the index above and a message
below in the screen.
Is there a reason for this ?
Seems a bit odd.
--
Regards
Cliff
Sending an email as follows will get you my public gpg key...
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 2001.08.03, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"John Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just talking to someone about mutt flagging mail with + when it's to
> you and T when it's to you and other, etc, and we were just wondering if
> mutt either does
asdf
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Replace Z's with E's to reply)
cat /dev/coffee | /dev/cup | /dev/mouth | /dev/nose > /dev/keyboard
-Anonymous
On Wed, 04 Oct 2000, the/eXtreme wrote:
> I have a lot of save-hooks that look like this one:
>
> save-hook '(~t ^mutt-users | ~c ^mutt-users)' =mutt
>
> and I wondered if anyone else thought a new operator
> like `~tc' might be convenient, e.g.:
>
>
the/eXtreme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 04 Oct 2000:
> I have a lot of save-hooks that look like this one:
>
> save-hook '(~t ^mutt-users | ~c ^mutt-users)' =mutt
>
> and I wondered if anyone else thought a new operator
> like `~tc' might be conv
I have a lot of save-hooks that look like this one:
save-hook '(~t ^mutt-users | ~c ^mutt-users)' =mutt
and I wondered if anyone else thought a new operator
like `~tc' might be convenient, e.g.:
save-hook '~tc ^mutt-users' =mutt
--
-jm
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 12:43:50AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> I've used cat > /dev/null followed by pressing the key, and seeing
> which characters get printed. This may or may not work for you...
[...]
At least under tcsh (haven't tried it under any other shell), it's as easy
to simply t
John E. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If I remember rightly, slang does not use terminfo
>
> It uses terminfo on systems that have it. For others, it uses termcap.
Thanks, I'll stop spreading misinformation now. :)
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If I remember rightly, slang does not use terminfo, but termcap instead.
It uses terminfo on systems that have it. For others, it uses
termcap.
--John
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought that the codes from terminfo are the ones programs see (if
> they use it, no matter how it is done), and so it is important that
> terminfo is correct.
The codes you refer to in terminfo are actually strings, whereas the
value KEY_NPAGE i
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 26 Feb 2000:
> Thanks a lot for the describtion of how keys are handled...it surprises me that
> it's done this way, as there is one layer more than I expected. I thought
> that the codes from terminfo are the ones programs see (if they use it, n
Hi there,
The little program David send (linked to ncurses) returns 0522 and 0523,
both curses.h and ncurses.h look like this:
#define KEY_NPAGE 0522/* Next page */
#define KEY_PPAGE 0523/* Previous page */
So terminfo has to be OK if I understood your expl
Hi David and others,
Thanks a lot for the describtion of how keys are handled...it surprises me that
it's done this way, as there is one layer more than I expected. I thought
that the codes from terminfo are the ones programs see (if they use it, no
matter how it is done), and so it is important
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 25 Feb 2000:
> As you can see, Mutt calls a function called wgetch(), to get a "key"
> from the keyboard. If that function returns 0522, then Mutt knows that
> you pressed the "next page" key, which Mutt calls "".
If you (Jens) really want to debu
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> now tried xkeycaps and changed keysym from next/prior to
> KP_next/KP_prior. Doesn't help, too.
That's probably because they were already set correctly.
> To finally see what happens it must be possible to make mutt tell me
> which key(sym/code)
Some "news" again...
now tried xkeycaps and changed keysym from next/prior to KP_next/KP_prior.
Doesn't help, too.
To finally see what happens it must be possible to make mutt tell me which
key(sym/code) it sees I can't believe that this should be impossible.
Maybe there's a patch. Doesn't t
display
> that -- but if it receives two 's, it will display the second on
> the command line.
shitdidn´t workwhatever I type before those keys, it´s always
the same: home/end won´t display anything but stop the input, while
pageup/down just make mutt beep without closing the promp
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 22 Feb 2000:
> Well, maybe you´re right and it´s better not to change ithowever, what´s
> so bad in remembering one more key to do things after all those combinations
> one uses with mutt, emacs, jed and all those M$-soft at work...
Whatever
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 22 Feb 2000:
> > I've used cat > /dev/null followed by pressing the key, and seeing
> > which characters get printed. This may or may not work for you...
> well, if I tell mutt to use those keys, it won´t recogniz
> I've used cat > /dev/null followed by pressing the key, and seeing
> which characters get printed. This may or may not work for you...
well, if I tell mutt to use those keys, it won´t recognize them, too. Is
there a way to make mutt display the code it sees, like in jed?
>
Hi Mikko,
Well, maybe you´re right and it´s better not to change ithowever, what´s
so bad in remembering one more key to do things after all those combinations
one uses with mutt, emacs, jed and all those M$-soft at work...
--
Jens Wilhelm Wulf *** [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 12:39:40AM +0200 or thereabouts, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 21 Feb 2000:
> > although I can´t find a word about it, ^c seems to be bound to "exit"
> > and I can´t unbind it. Or does mutt ca
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 21 Feb 2000:
> I just updated my whole system, now mutt tells me that the keys I mentioned are
> not bound. Well, of course they are, but mutt doesn´t seem to get their
> standard-codes. Is there a possibility to find out w
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 21 Feb 2000:
> although I can´t find a word about it, ^c seems to be bound to "exit" and I
> can´t unbind it. Or does mutt catch a signal on ^c and runs "exit" by itself?
> However, I want to bind ^x^c
I just updated my whole system, now mutt tells me that the keys I mentioned are
not bound. Well, of course they are, but mutt doesn´t seem to get their
standard-codes. Is there a possibility to find out which codes mutt receives so
I can bind them?
I linked mutt against the current slang-version
Hi there,
although I can´t find a word about it, ^c seems to be bound to "exit" and I
can´t unbind it. Or does mutt catch a signal on ^c and runs "exit" by itself?
However, I want to bind ^x^c to "quit". Because of the fact just mentioned
mutt never executes w
75 matches
Mail list logo
