On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:24:00AM -0400, Matt Rechkemmer wrote:
Lately, I've found myself needing to change my replies' From address and
signature based on which address the original message was sent to. I
thought reply-hooks would be perfect for this, but I kept getting jammed up
on my default
Lately, I've found myself needing to change my replies' From address and
signature based on which address the original message was sent to. I
thought reply-hooks would be perfect for this, but I kept getting jammed up
on my default send-hook. I dug this gem out of the archive from 2002:
> Howeve
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:53:34AM +0200, Thorsten Scherf wrote:
I did some signature configuration based on folder-hooks and send-hooks.
As default send-hook, I've choosen a specific signature that changes
based on different recipient addresses. I now want to change the
signature also bas
I did some signature configuration based on folder-hooks and send-hooks.
As default send-hook, I've choosen a specific signature that changes
based on different recipient addresses. I now want to change the
signature also based on specific holders, but it looks like the config I
did for
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 05:31:19PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> To sum up, it seems that the address matched with ~f stay the same while
> all send-hooks are processed. Is it the expected behaviour?
Yes, this is expected behavior. You want to change the last send-hook
to send2-hook,
ure-domain"'
If the From: address has been changed by the third send-hook, the fourth
one won't match. However, if the From: address has been changed thanks
to reverse_name, then the fourth send-hook will match.
To sum up, it seems that the address matched with ~f stay the same whi
* Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-11 10:54 (CEST)]
> nope still doesnt work I noticed that I have set from at the
> top of my muttrc is this causing problems for send hooks?
Lookup use_from in the manual. Perhaps you're mixing things up,
where you have to choose onl
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:11:17PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Toby Coleridge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > send-hook . unmy_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ^^^
>
> Leave that out.
>
> > send-hook '~C @lboro.ac.uk' 'my_hdr From: me@myuniaddress'
>
Toby Coleridge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> send-hook . unmy_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^
Leave that out.
> send-hook '~C @lboro.ac.uk' 'my_hdr From: me@myuniaddress'
That should work.
Michael
--
Avoid the Gates of Hell. Use Linux
(Unknown s
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 09:26:19AM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> At 15:18 +0200 12 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 00:06]:
> > > I thought that you need to use "set from=" in send-hooks
&g
send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I get it from
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] not the send-hook as I believe I should .. any ideas?
I thought that you need to use "set from=" in send-hooks instead of
using my_hdr, but I might misremember.
--
-D.We establised a fine coffee.
At 15:18 +0200 12 Oct 2002, Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-12 00:06]:
> > I thought that you need to use "set from=" in send-hooks
> > instead of using my_hdr, but I might misremember.
No, it's the
m: me@myuniemailadrress
> >
> > however when I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I get it from
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] not the send-hook as I believe I should ..
> > any ideas?
>
> I thought that you need to use "set from=" in send-hooks
> instead of using m
Nope no other send hooks defined ..
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:59:37AM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> * Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-2002 11:55]:
>
> [Michael]
> > > send-hook '~C student.lboro.ac.uk' 'my_hdr From: me@myuniemailadrress'
&g
* Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-2002 11:55]:
[Michael]
> > send-hook '~C student.lboro.ac.uk' 'my_hdr From: me@myuniemailadrress'
> nope still doesnt work I noticed that I have set from at the top of
> my muttrc is this causing problems for sen
* Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-2002 12:50]:
> I do however have this in my sendmail.mc / cf :
>
> define(`confDOMAIN_NAME', `4mationnet.com')dnl
>
> because I am behind a private network and I get lots of 550 returned mail.
>
> would this make a difference?
I don't know, I know n
f my
> muttrc is this causing problems for send hooks?
Hm, change the default send-hook to unmy_hdr From?
HTH,
Michael
--
"Oh, I've seen copies [of Linux Journal] around the terminal room at The
Labs."
(By Dennis Ritchie)
PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
Nope no other send hooks defined ..
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:59:37AM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> > * Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-2002 11:55]:
> >
> > [Michael]
> > > > send-hook '~C student.lboro.ac.uk' 'my_hdr From: me
* Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-11 10:10]:
> > > > send-hook '~C student.lboro.ac.uk' 'my_hdr From: me@myuniemailadrress'
> > > nope still doesnt work I noticed that I have set from at the
> > > top of my muttrc is this cau
* Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-10 20:25]:
> If I setup two send hooks as follows:
> send-hook ."my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;"
> send-hook blah "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;"
what are the semicola for? delete them.
> am i right i
No the email address in the compose window is still wrong ... ?
Toby
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:10:05PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> * Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-10-2002 12:50]:
>
> > I do however have this in my sendmail.mc / cf :
> >
> > define(`confDOMAIN_NAME', `4mationnet.com')d
Hi Michael,
nope still doesnt work I noticed that I have set from at the top of my muttrc is this
causing problems for send hooks?
Thanks
Toby.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 11:42:44AM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> Toby Coleridge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > i have the following:
>
Toby Coleridge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> i have the following:
>
> send-hook . my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> send-hook @student\.lboro\.ac\.uk my_hdr From: me@myuniemailadrress
send-hook '~C student.lboro.ac.uk' 'my_hdr From: me@myuniemailadrress'
HTH,
Michael
--
"...Deep Hack Mode--
i have the following:
send-hook . my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
send-hook @student\.lboro\.ac\.uk my_hdr From: me@myuniemailadrress
however when I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I get it from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not the send-hook as I believe I should .. any ideas?
Thanks
Toby
* Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-10-2002 22:27]:
> If I setup two send hooks as follows:
>
> send-hook . "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;"
> send-hook blah "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;"
What's with the semicolons?
> am i right
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toby Coleridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I setup two send hooks as follows:
> send-hook . "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;"
> send-hook blah "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;"
>
> am i right in t
If I setup two send hooks as follows:
send-hook . "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;"
send-hook blah "my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;"
am i right in thinking that the second send hook will be activated on any To: or Cc:
(or Bcc?) that contains blah in the address, does
hi all,
Until now I have used the program signature (by Ian McDonald) launched
at the startup via .bash_profile for creating a dynamic .signature file
(something like this: signature -q .quotefile -r -t .templatefile)
Obviously in my .muttrc I have put set signature = .signature
Now I want to c
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 05:30:08PM -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 11:42:56PM +0200, Manuel Hendel (dis)graced my inbox with:
> > Hallo,
> >
> > I'm using mutt 1.3.x. I use send-hooks to define the "my_hdr From:",
> >
Hallo,
I'm using mutt 1.3.x. I use send-hooks to define the "my_hdr From:",
"my_hdr Organisation:" and the signature. If write the muttrc file and
start mutt, everything works fine, but after a while, mutt gets
confused and brings wrong Organisation or wron signat
I'm using 1.2.5i and have a small dilemma. I'm trying to expand my send-hooks
a bit so that when I send to a particular address, it'll modify my from:
header. Ok, no big deal. send-hook's work just fine for that IF I'm
either _replying_ to a mail, or if I turn of
hi list!
i have some files with e-mail adresses inside for procmail to sort my
mail to different mailboxes. in mutt, i use shortcuts to assign new
addresses to the lists. one list looks like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
now i'd like to add a send
posing,
either (edit_hdrs is set).
When, exactly are these hooks called? it seems there must be a
way to make it work on any message, otherwise the send-hooks aren't
much good. Is it possible that they are only getting called when the
message is initiated rather than when it is sent? If so, how
hi list!
i got a simple problem for which i didn't find a solution in the man
pages.
i have four send-hooks defined to change my FROM-address and my sig
according to the recipient. my .muttrc looks like this:
[1] send-hook . "my_hdr From: Andre Bonhote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>&qu
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:29:23AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> Well, with that I end up with
>
> send-hook . 'set folder=~/Mail'
> send-hook concordia.ca 'set folder=~/Mail/conu'
> send-hook !concordia.ca 'set folder=~/Mail/personal'
>
> and, as you can see, that first condition never
How about using Procmail rules to put your mail where you like?
* Rich Lafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010308 08:56]:
=>On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:47:00AM -0500, Peter Kovacs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
=>> On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:29:23AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
=>> > folder-hook . 'set fol
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:47:00AM -0500, Peter Kovacs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:29:23AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> > folder-hook . 'set folder=~/mail'
> > send-hook concordia.ca 'set folder=~/mail/conu'
> > send-hook !concordia.ca 'set folder=~/mail/personal
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:29:23AM -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> folder-hook . 'set folder=~/mail'
> send-hook concordia.ca 'set folder=~/mail/conu'
> send-hook !concordia.ca 'set folder=~/mail/personal'
how about:
send-hook . 'set folder=~/mail/personal'
send-hook concordi
diately after, it mungs up normal
> > operations (since I still want "folder" to just be "~/mail/").
> >
> > Is there a straightforward way to do such a thing?
>
> If your send-hooks work except for the resetting problem, the solution
> is easy. Just
ust be "~/mail/").
>
> Is there a straightforward way to do such a thing?
If your send-hooks work except for the resetting problem, the solution
is easy. Just add the following lint to your muttrc _above_ the other
send-hooks so that it will be executed before the others.
send-
Hi,
I'm having trouble figuring out how to change the behavior of mutt's
save_name feature.
What I'm trying to do is to get mutt to do the save_name thing, except
instead of having it save in =username, I want it to save in
=work/username if any recipient's address contains "concordia.ca", and
i
Can someone help me? I've got the following lines in my .muttrc:
send-hook '~f ^@domain\.com$' 'my_hdr From: User Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
send-hook '~t ^@domain\.com$' 'my_hdr From: User Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
with which I am trying to accomplish the following: I'd like that
when I reply to
I've found my stupidity. I know regex, so I should have seen this
right away.
^@domain.com will always be a no-grok.
Thanks anyway.
On 11/08, Me rearranged the electrons to read:
> Can someone help me? I've got the following lines in my .muttrc:
> send-hook '~f ^@domain\.com$' 'my_hdr From: Use
Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
> > send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:'
>
>Is this classified as a bug, or a feature? :)
It's a feature, a design desicision. Since you can use any muttrc
command in send-hooks, it would be unworkably com
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:32:15PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote:
> > exactly. when you set the sig, or a header, it's not only for that message.
> > so you need to do something like:
> >
> > send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:'
> > send-hook . 'unset signature'
>
>Cool, so it's not just me...
>
>
Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 24 Oct 2000:
>I've got alternates set, and I tried both set reverse_name and set
> reverse_realname. I'm not having any luck with either. With mail
> addresses to a different address (actually different user, same domain),
> when I hit reply, I
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 05:22:30PM -0400, Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:53:25PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote:
> > set from="Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> > alternates="(support|achung)@mycompany\.(com|net|org)"
> >
> > send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'my_hd
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 04:53:25PM -0400, Adrian Chung wrote:
> set from="Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> alternates="(support|achung)@mycompany\.(com|net|org)"
>
> send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'my_hdr From: company support
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
> send-hook '~f support@mycompany' 'set si
Hi! I figured out how to set things up so that now I can properly reply to
different people based on the original inbound email address.
But I ran into a strange occurrence, which I'm not sure is my fault.
I've set up mutt so that:
set reverse_name
set from="Adrian Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
a
Using a large mallet, Adrian Chung whacked out:
> when I hit reply, I get my username @ my.local.machine.name.
likely you have to set the envelope sender too - post the relevant parts of
your muttrc plz
>Why don't you like qmail?
it's an allergy of some kind :P I prefer exim (or i
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 11:13:30PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adrian Chung proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > The suggestions I've heard say to do something like:
>
> > send-hook \
> > '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' \
> > 'my_hdr From: [EM
Adrian Chung proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> The suggestions I've heard say to do something like:
> send-hook \
> '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' \
> 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
set alternates, and set reverse_name
> I'm assuming that this is a feature that
Hi all! A co-worker stated the other day that the biggest feature that has
kept him from switching from Pine to mutt is the fact that pine supports
roles.
>From what I could gather, a role in pine basically allows you to set your
From: email address depending on who the message you're replying t
I have this at work too. However, I incorporated folder-hook for this
function, and it works very nicely. Folder-hook and send-hooks, used
with each other seemed to do the trick for me.
If you use $edit_headers that should do the trick though, i would think.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 04:41:33PM
Darren West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 19 Sep 2000:
> If I invoke mail(compose) from within mutt via keybind 'm' in a folder
> though, it always pops into the default profile..since the send-hook is
> dependant on the "To" info.
> It would be great if it first prompted for "To" info, then c
send-hook is a really cool feature, since it allows me to have a "work profile" and a
"non-work" each with custom signatures and header info, based on who I am sending mail
to.
If I invoke mail(compose) from within mutt via keybind 'm' in a folder though, it
always pops into the default profi
Mikko Hänninen:
|Oh, right. That's the usual "|'s in patterns must be quoted" issue.
|
|Try this:
|
| send-hook "^~C '(jim|john|joe)@home.com'" "set pgp_autoencrypt"
|
|Or if that doesn't work, try escaping (\) the |'s, or double escaping...
|It's a known issue, sort of a bug, in the way
Randall Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 14 Aug 2000:
> Well, I tried that before my original post. Here is the error Mutt
> generates on start-up:
>
> Error in /home/rhh/.mutt/lists.mutt, line 29: parentheses not balanced
> Error in /home/rhh/.muttrc-1.2i, line 205: source: errors i
Mikko Hänninen:
|Randall Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 13 Aug 2000:
|> manual.txt suggests a leading '^', but this doesn't work. Maybe
|> it only works where you can specify a pattern flag, as in: ^~C \.de$
|
|Well, you *can* do this with send-ho
Randall Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 13 Aug 2000:
> manual.txt suggests a leading '^', but this doesn't work. Maybe
> it only works where you can specify a pattern flag, as in: ^~C \.de$
Well, you *can* do this with send-hooks. If you only specif
Well, well, well, after looking around, it doesn't help to have a
send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Wari Wahab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' ;)
Talk about massive oversight ;) Thanks dude
* Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000814 11:02]:
> Using a large mallet, Wari Wahab whacked out:
> > How do I se
Using a large mallet, Wari Wahab whacked out:
> How do I send a mail as a different user if I recieved the mails as the
> other users... (Is that proper english?;).. For example, if someone
> sends a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I want to reply it as
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get what I mean? Can't seem
Hi there, I've seen send-hooks that react to sending via a different
email account if the recipient in so and so...
send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
How do I send a mail as a different user if I recieved the mails as the
other users... (Is that
Send hooks engage if the pattern matches "any" recipient.
How do I construct one that engages only if the pattern matches "all"
recipients.
For example:
unset pgp_autoencrypt
send-hook (jim|john|joe)@home.com "set pgp_autoencrypt"
This
Charles Curley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 03 Apr 2000:
> -> Others have noted this has been around forever, I will add that you should
> -> also see the $alternates variable, as reverse_name is useless without it.
>
> OK, having gotten this far, how do you set it up? I experimented and cam
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:41:53AM -0600, Charles Curley muttered:
-> On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 04:29:01PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser muttered:
-> -> Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
-> -> > Jimmy Mäkelä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-> -> > > Is it possible to look at the original To: of the messa
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 04:29:01PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser muttered:
-> Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
-> > Jimmy Mäkelä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-> > > Is it possible to look at the original To: of the message which I wan't
-> > > to reply to, and execute commands based on the contents
Aaron Schrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 25 Mar 2000:
> The order for this stuff is:
>
> - Apply $from
> - Do $reverse_name
> - Do send-hooks (including 'my_hdr From:')
Ok, thanks for the explanation. I suppose the default send-hook then
should have a "
override a
default set by my_hdr. The order for this stuff is:
- Apply $from
- Do $reverse_name
- Do send-hooks (including 'my_hdr From:')
If applying $from were to be moved after the send-hooks, then $from
would have exactly the same problems as 'my_hdr From:'. Unless applying
Hi,
My turn to have a question. :-) Since I seem to answer questions about
send-hooks, $reverse_name, my_hdr From: etc., I thought I should try to
finally adapt my own .muttrc files to using "set from=" instead of
"my_hdr From:".
I ran into a problem though. I simply r
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Jimmy Mäkelä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Is it possible to look at the original To: of the message which I wan't
> > to reply to, and execute commands based on the contents of that.
> >
> > This would be nice since it is pretty common to have more th
On 2000-01-26 13:25:33 +, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> See reverse_name in the latest mutt. Unfortunately this isn't in
> mutt-1.0, I think.
Reverse_name is a pretty old feature, and certainly present in
stable.
However, it's more useful together with the new versions' "from"
variable.
--
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 26 Jan 2000:
> This must surely be the second most frequently asked question (after
> the one about hooks having a permanent effect unless you also have a
> default hook to reset the state).
Indeed. :-)
> See reverse_name in the latest mutt.
Jimmy Mäkelä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is it possible to look at the original To: of the message which I wan't
> to reply to, and execute commands based on the contents of that.
>
> This would be nice since it is pretty common to have more than one
> email-address, and it is IMHO better to have t
Is it possible to look at the original To: of the message which I wan't
to reply to, and execute commands based on the contents of that.
This would be nice since it is pretty common to have more than one
email-address, and it is IMHO better to have the address which they wrote
to as From in the r
ever,
> $reverse_name doesn't work well with mh_hdr From (which always takes
> precedence). So instead you probably should switch to setting the $from
> variable, available in Mutt 1.1.1i which you seem to use, rather than
> having my_hdr From in your send-hooks. The $from variable wa
However,
$reverse_name doesn't work well with mh_hdr From (which always takes
precedence). So instead you probably should switch to setting the $from
variable, available in Mutt 1.1.1i which you seem to use, rather than
having my_hdr From in your send-hooks. The $from variable was
introduced j
Thanks...I think the default-hook did the trick ... THanks man!
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 07:43:57AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Hello!
>
> ...and then Jackal said...
> % I have some problems with the send-hooks in my muttrc. It does not seem to
> % work as I expect it. Ma
Hello!
...and then Jackal said...
% I have some problems with the send-hooks in my muttrc. It does not seem to
% work as I expect it. Maybe someone can enlighten me.
I can try...
%
% I have these two send-hooks in my muttrc
%
% send-hook '~t@' 'my_hdr From: Default Name
I have some problems with the send-hooks in my muttrc. It does not seem to
work as I expect it. Maybe someone can enlighten me.
I have these two send-hooks in my muttrc
send-hook '~t@' 'my_hdr From: Default Name ; set
sendmail='/path/to/sendmail -oi -oem -f default@e
Hi John!
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, John P . Looney wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 02:39:23PM +, Sean Rima mentioned:
> > Hi David!
> >
> > On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote:
> >
> > > Sean --
> > >
> > > If I understand you correctly, you want replies to email sent to your
> > > yifan acc
Hi David!
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote:
> Sean --
>
> ...and then Sean Rima said...
> % Hi David!
>
> Hi there!
>
>
> %
> % On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote:
> %
> % > yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets
> % >
> % > If that's correct, then
Sean --
...and then Sean Rima said...
% Hi David!
Hi there!
%
% On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote:
%
% > yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets
% >
% > If that's correct, then I believe you want to unset "use_from", and you
% > might also want to specif
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 02:39:23PM +, Sean Rima mentioned:
> Hi David!
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote:
>
> > Sean --
> >
> > If I understand you correctly, you want replies to email sent to your
> > yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets
> > your
Hi David!
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, David T-G wrote:
> Sean --
>
> If I understand you correctly, you want replies to email sent to your
> yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets
> your from address as yifan when it sees that the email was sent there.
>
> If that's
Sean --
If I understand you correctly, you want replies to email sent to your
yifan account to come from your softhome account, but mutt currently sets
your from address as yifan when it sees that the email was sent there.
If that's correct, then I believe you want to unset "use_from", and you
m
my Yifan.net account that Mutt replies using the
Yifan.net as the from address instead of the softhome.net one.
Any suggestions, as I played around with Send-hooks. Using 1.1.1i
Sean
--
GPG ID (DSA) 92B9D0CF PGP2 ID 19592A0D Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813
To get my PGP Keys send me an empty
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 17:16 +0200, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> ok, i´ve a question about send-hooks:
> is there a possibilitie to let send-hooks affect only this one mail?
> an exmaple:
> pgp_autoencrypt is unset and i want mails to one andress get
> encrypted.
> if i se
hi !
im quiet new in using Mutt, but it just great ! :-)
ok, i´ve a question about send-hooks:
is there a possibilitie to let send-hooks affect only this one mail?
an exmaple:
pgp_autoencrypt is unset and i want mails to one andress get
encrypted.
if i set "pgp_autoencrypt" via a se
der. I believe there is a limitation
that the subject cannot be set by send-hooks. But any other header
should be settable.
> I need to change the "From:" in a scripted mail out that I do with
> perl.
Why use Mutt? Why not simply format your headers the way you want them
to be,
Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Many months of fiddling and I have not managed to get send-hooks to work.
In what way do they fail to work?
> Here is my muttrc - can you see why?
No.
They work for me, though.
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equa
Hi
Many months of fiddling and I have not managed to get send-hooks to work.
Here is my muttrc - can you see why?
#send-hook '~A' 'my_hdr From: Mutt User '
send-hook '~A' 'my_hdr Subject: THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT'
#send-hook . 'my_hdr From: &l
I use the autoedit feature of Mutt, and have found that it's incompatible
with using send-hooks. Since mutt doesn't prompt you for a recipient when
autoedit is turned on, the send-hook never activates.
I realize that this falls under the note in the documentation for send-hook,
but h
Why do I need to put two backslashes before the '+' in the first
regexp, but only one before the '.' in the second?
send-hook '~t ^lang\\+moo' 'my_hdr From: Mr Bean '
I have a mailing list set up at a box in my email address and I
want to change my From: line for emails to that email+box
addre
94 matches
Mail list logo
