On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:33:13PM EDT, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way, in mutt, to search for emails sent on a specific date? Say
> emails sent on September 22 2010?
>
> Many thanks,
> Ranjan
>
l to limit the box while index
Start reading here http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#p
Hi,
Is there a way, in mutt, to search for emails sent on a specific date? Say
emails sent on September 22 2010?
Many thanks,
Ranjan
Le 30-05-2022, à 14:49:53 -0500, Ranjan Maitra a écrit :
Can mairix and notmuch also search within attachments?
I don't know but after a quick look, it seems that those tools only index
text files.
On Mon May30'22 07:25:28AM, steve wrote:
> From: steve
> Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 07:25:28 +0200
> To: mutt-users@mutt.org
> Subject: Re: searching across folders using mutt
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Le dimanche 29 mai 2022 à 23:31, Greg Marks a écrit :
>
> >
> &
d, it is recommended
>you first convert it to maildir format with a utility such
>as mb2md before running notmuch setup .
>
> Is there a solution for searching across folders for those of us whose
> e-mail is stored in mbox rather than maildir format?
You could just use the f
Hello,
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 11:31:51PM -0500, Greg Marks wrote:
Is there a solution for searching across folders for those of us whose
e-mail is stored in mbox rather than maildir format?
Mairix does: https://github.com/rc0/mairix
Cheers,
Ángel
Hi Greg,
Le dimanche 29 mai 2022 à 23:31, Greg Marks a écrit :
Is there a solution for searching across folders for those of us whose
e-mail is stored in mbox rather than maildir format?
I guess mairix can do that.
See https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/wikis/UseCases/SearchingMail
On Sun May29'22 11:31:51PM, Greg Marks wrote:
> From: Greg Marks
> Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 23:31:51 -0500
> To: mutt-users@mutt.org
> Subject: Re: searching across folders using mutt
>
> > Now, I know how to search this (quite readily) in a folder. But when I do
>
before running notmuch setup .
Is there a solution for searching across folders for those of us whose
e-mail is stored in mbox rather than maildir format?
Best regards,
Greg Marks
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun May29'22 08:14:20PM, steve wrote:
> From: steve
> Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 20:14:20 +0200
> To: mutt-users@mutt.org
> Subject: Re: searching across folders using mutt
>
> Hi Ranjan,
>
> notmuch will do exactly that.
>
> see https://notmuchmail.org/m
issue, and that is searching
across folders.
So, suppose I know that I have an email in some folder with "stuff" in the
subject line. Now, I know how to search this (quite readily) in a folder. But when I do
not know the folder it is stored in, so far, it has been simply about guessing
Dear friends,
I have now been using mutt for about 20 months or so, having graduated from
sylpheed, and life is generally well, but for one issue, and that is searching
across folders.
So, suppose I know that I have an email in some folder with "stuff" in the
subject line. Now, I k
* Chinmaya Nagpal [2021-08-20 23:20]:
> Is there any way to make it faster to do ~b limits in maildir mailboxes?
> I don't really use notmuch for much other than message body searching so
> I'm considering if I should get rid of it entirely.
If you don't know who is t
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 01:49:27AM +0530, Chinmaya Nagpal wrote:
Is there any way to make it faster to do ~b limits in maildir mailboxes?
$thorough_search, set by default, decodes each message before searching
through it. You most likely want to do this, but it does slow the
searching down
Is there any way to make it faster to do ~b limits in maildir mailboxes?
I don't really use notmuch for much other than message body searching so
I'm considering if I should get rid of it entirely.
On 07.02.18 03:54, David Woodfall wrote:
> > When I use search or limit in my sent folder on an address it shows no
> > matches. They seem to only work on subjects. Is there a way to get
> > them to work on addresses?
> >
> > -dave
> >
>
> I found limit ~C
In the index, "/ ~h elephant" will fi
When I use search or limit in my sent folder on an address it shows no
matches. They seem to only work on subjects. Is there a way to get
them to work on addresses?
-dave
I found limit ~C
-dave
When I use search or limit in my sent folder on an address it shows no
matches. They seem to only work on subjects. Is there a way to get
them to work on addresses?
-dave
From: Cameron Simpson
Date: Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 07:52:42AM +1100
> On 04Dec2015 20:45, Jurriaan wrote:
> >Is there any way to have the 'l' command (limit) default to include
> >searching the recipients email addresses in the sent mail folder?
> >
> W
On 04Dec2015 20:45, Jurriaan wrote:
Is there any way to have the 'l' command (limit) default to include
searching the recipients email addresses in the sent mail folder?
Normally, when I press 'l' and enter a word, that word is searched for
in the email-address of the sende
Is there any way to have the 'l' command (limit) default to include
searching the recipients email addresses in the sent mail folder?
Normally, when I press 'l' and enter a word, that word is searched for
in the email-address of the sender and in the subject, I think.
In t
ting your
employer or client companies and stuff like that; you can "l"imit
the mail view by one or more groups and then do further searching
or browsing.
I've got a macro named "LB" I use that limits to fairly comoplicated
pattern I use a lot when review my mail history in a pa
* Erik Christiansen on Monday, June 03, 2013 at 23:41:59 +1000
> On 03.06.13 14:30, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> I'd like to search messages by recipient in my Sent-Folder, but at least my
>> mutt install won't do it out of the box.
>
> To do that, I just use:
>
> / ~h some_recipient_name
>
> O
On 03.06.13 14:30, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> I'd like to search messages by recipient in my Sent-Folder, but at least my
> mutt install won't do it out of the box.
To do that, I just use:
/ ~h some_recipient_name
OK, that looks in all the headers, but you probably want to check Cc: as
well, a
I'd like to search messages by recipient in my Sent-Folder, but at least my
mutt install won't do it out of the box.
Is the scope mutt searches for limited by context (e.g. Sent-Folder) or do I
have to use a special search keyword?
THX
p@rick
--
Patrick Ben Koetter
p...@state-of-mind.de
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 03:49:48PM -0400, Tim Gray wrote:
Try '~f'. So limit, then `~f name`.
Thanks Tim,
That seems to work pretty well.
--
John
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:36:15PM +0200, John Niendorf wrote:
>
> How do you guys search for all messages from a particular sender?
> When I do a search, it picks up words from the subject by ignores the
> sender's (or recipient's) address.
One option is to use the sort "o" function.
--
Greg
Incoming from John Niendorf:
>
> How do you guys search for all messages from a particular sender?
> When I do a search, it picks up words from the subject by ignores
> the sender's (or recipient's) address.
I prefer grepmail. It's its own .deb in Wheezy, or
http://grepmail.sourceforge.net/
-
On Apr 27, 2013 at 09:36 PM +0200, John Niendorf wrote:
How do you guys search for all messages from a particular sender?
When I do a search, it picks up words from the subject by ignores the
sender's (or recipient's) address.
Try '~f'. So limit, then `~f name`.
Hi Guys,
How do you guys search for all messages from a particular sender?
When I do a search, it picks up words from the subject by ignores the sender's
(or recipient's) address.
--
John
Aha!
Fixed.
Many thanks,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2012-05-29, Xylo Drum wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Gary Johnson wrote:
>> > On 2012-05-29, Xylo Drum wrote:
>> >> I have a pretty much default mutt setup including some very simple
>> >> lines in
On 2012-05-29, Xylo Drum wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On 2012-05-29, Xylo Drum wrote:
> >> I have a pretty much default mutt setup including some very simple
> >> lines in my .mailcap such as:
> >>
> >> image/jpg; xview %s
> >> image/jpeg; xview %s
> >>
> >> t
Hi Gary,
Thanks for swift reply. Your solution works in that it fixes the
'search' problem, but it means that I can't view the attachments with
'v' - there needs to be a way to use 'switch' in the mailcap, or get
mutt to use different mailcaps in different contexts.
Cheers,
On Tue, May 29, 2012
On 2012-05-29, Xylo Drum wrote:
> I have a pretty much default mutt setup including some very simple
> lines in my .mailcap such as:
>
> image/jpg; xview %s
> image/jpeg; xview %s
>
> these work fine for viewing images, but when trying to do a 'l' search
> with a pattern of ~bfoo mutt keeps throw
I have a pretty much default mutt setup including some very simple
lines in my .mailcap such as:
image/jpg; xview %s
image/jpeg; xview %s
these work fine for viewing images, but when trying to do a 'l' search
with a pattern of ~bfoo mutt keeps throwing up
mailcap entry for type image/jpeg not fo
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 09:49:57AM +0200, j...@telefonica.net wrote:
> Nico, I will search for your macro to see what can I do with regular
> expressions.
For your convenience:
macro index ,
!~D^J/path/to/some/maildir/^J^J
"Move all undeleted messages to maildir folders"
Then use ',' to move a
* Nicolas Williams [09-10-10 00:19]:
> But for some use cases external programs like getmail, fetchmail and
> procmail all fall short. For example, I've given up on fetchmail
> because it dropped 30K messages once (from a 100K msg folder). I've
> given up on getmail because it doesn't preserve m
Angel Navarro Cortes
email: j...@telefonica.net
web: http://janc.es/
Usuario Linux: #49178
El 10.09.09 23:13:35 > Nicolas Williams dijo:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 06:53:07AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:57:51PM +0200, j...@telefonica.net wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 06:53:07AM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:57:51PM +0200, j...@telefonica.net wrote:
> >I'm searching about a hook that will save to its mailbox all mails with
> >To: list_...@server.com after had read them, I think when c
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:57:51PM +0200, j...@telefonica.net wrote:
I'm searching about a hook that will save to its mailbox all mails with
To: list_...@server.com after had read them, I think when changing
mailboxes.
Now, I received all mails to +spoolfile but I would like to move with a
=- j...@telefonica.net wrote on Tue 7.Sep'10 at 12:57:51 +0200 -=
> I'm searching about a hook that will save to its mailbox all mails
> with To: list_...@server.com after had read them, I think when
> changing mailboxes.
Use macro rather than hook to save before change, rep
Hi all.
I'm searching about a hook that will save to its mailbox all mails with
To: list_...@server.com after had read them, I think when changing
mailboxes.
Now, I received all mails to +spoolfile but I would like to move with a
hook the ones coming To: list_...@server.com after had read
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:57:11PM +0800, fvw wrote:
> / ~b EXPR
Thanks.
--
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:57:11PM +0800, fvw wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 04:36:25AM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
> >How can I search through the body of all messages in a folder?
> >
> >I have mairix set up for my archives, but not my inbox. My current
> >setup would make it problematic to do so
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 04:36:25AM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
>Hey,
>
>How can I search through the body of all messages in a folder?
>
>I have mairix set up for my archives, but not my inbox. My current setup would
>make it problematic to do so. Is it possible to do a simple search through the
>mes
Hey,
How can I search through the body of all messages in a folder?
I have mairix set up for my archives, but not my inbox. My current setup would
make it problematic to do so. Is it possible to do a simple search through the
message bodies of the current folder?
Thanks,
--
Noah Slater, http:/
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:36:43PM -0600, lee wrote:
> is it possible to somehow search within search results?
Thanks a lot for your answers! I didn't even know that it's possible
to combine different search criteria in one line, and I've been using
mutt for years ... Combining them should be eno
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:36:43PM -0600, lee wrote:
is it possible to somehow search within search results? For example,
if I want to find a message of which I know the From: header and a
word or some words of the body, how do I find it when going by either
the From: line or the body only would
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 08:36:43PM -0600, lee wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to somehow search within search results? For
> example, if I want to find a message of which I know the From:
> header and a word or some words of the body, how do I find it when
> going by either the From: line or th
Hi,
* lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2008-11-19 20:36:43 Wed:
> is it possible to somehow search within search results? For example,
> if I want to find a message of which I know the From: header and a
> word or some words of the body, how do I find it when going by either
> the From: line or the body o
r the body only would give too many results?
>
> Maybe tag messages by From: header and then limit the search to tagged
> messages? That would work for two levels of searching only, unless I'd
> start copying messages around or so ... which I could do to begin
> with. Hmm. But
From: header and then limit the search to tagged
messages? That would work for two levels of searching only, unless I'd
start copying messages around or so ... which I could do to begin
with. Hmm. But is there a better way?
--
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
* Anton Shterenlikht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-30-08 08:35]:
> > another "shot in the dark", set edit_headers
>
> Wrapping headers in the editor mode?
> That'll do!
That is the configuration that provided wrapping in the headers?
Who'd have thought :^)
glad to have helped.
--
Patrick Shana
> another "shot in the dark", set edit_headers
Wrapping headers in the editor mode?
That'll do!
many thanks
anton
--
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:41:27PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Anton Shterenlikht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-29-08 10:52]:
> > I just installed mutt-devel-1.5.18_1.
> > I added "set wrap = -1" to leave 1 space free on the right hand
> > side of the screen.
> > However, the behaviour in message
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 03:18:14PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 02:05:55PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Anton Shterenlikht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-27-08 11:59]:
> > >
> >
> > yes, I didn't notice that you were still using
> >User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
> >
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 02:05:55PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Anton Shterenlikht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-27-08 11:59]:
> >
>
> yes, I didn't notice that you were still using
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
>
> 6.3.205. smart_wrap
>
> Type: boolean
> Default: yes
>
> Contr
* Anton Shterenlikht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-27-08 11:59]:
>
> I use vi, and words do wrap in the editor, though
> not in the input fields.
>
> When I the To/Cc/Bcc long list,
> it is cut at the terminal edge, not wrapped.
>
> The "wrapcolumn" is not recognised by my mutt:
yes, I didn't notic
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 04:57:20PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:14:46AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Anton Shterenlikht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-27-08 10:39]:
> > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:22:41AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > if your ter
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:14:46AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Anton Shterenlikht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-27-08 10:39]:
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:22:41AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > >
> > > if your terminal program is utilizing emacs keystrokes, or
> > > will go forward one wo
* Anton Shterenlikht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-27-08 10:39]:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:22:41AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> >
> > if your terminal program is utilizing emacs keystrokes, or
> > will go forward one word (white space delimited) and
> > or will go backward one word. Maybe th
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:22:41AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Anton Shterenlikht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06-27-08 09:08]:
> > Is it possible to wrap the TO: line when there are many addresses
> > on the line?
> >
> > I understand there are some line editing options (sec. 2.2 of the
> > user m
> > One good way is to have a local copy of them, using a tool like
> > offlineimap, and then point mutt and mairix to the local maildir instead
> > of the imap server. Plus you get offline access to your e-mail as a
> > bonus!
>
> Does offlineimap provide a stable setup when you have 100s of email
On 06/13/08 10:29, Joseph wrote:
> Does offlineimap provide a stable setup when you have 100s of emails and
> 10s of folders?
I've started using offlineimap a few months ago, and use it for two
different mail accounts and 17 different mailboxes. One of them is for
a mailing list that can easily r
On 06/13/08, Vincent Beffara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I would like to find a way to search multiple folders on imaps from with
> > Mutt.
> >
> > I tried getting mairix to work but it seems to want to only search local
> > folders.
> >
> > Is there a another way to search imap folders that are only avail
Hi,
> I would like to find a way to search multiple folders on imaps from with
> Mutt.
>
> I tried getting mairix to work but it seems to want to only search local
> folders.
>
> Is there a another way to search imap folders that are only available
> remote?
One good way is to have a local copy o
I would like to find a way to search multiple folders on imaps from with
Mutt.
I tried getting mairix to work but it seems to want to only search local
folders.
Is there a another way to search imap folders that are only available
remote?
--
+ respectfully, Joseph =+
signature.asc
De
On Apr 14 14:24, Angel Olivera wrote:
> On Mon 14.Apr.08 14:11, Steve S wrote:
>> Occasionally, I get mail where the content is base64 encoded
>
> [...]
>
>> The problem is that I can search the message body for some text only
>> when I view it in the pager since Mutt correctly decodes the content
On Mon 14.Apr.08 14:11, Steve S wrote:
Occasionally, I get mail where the content is base64 encoded
[...]
The problem is that I can search the message body for some text only when I
view it in the pager since Mutt correctly decodes the content. But from the
message index a search "~b EXPR" m
Hi all
Occasionally, I get mail where the content is base64 encoded
[...headers...]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
[...more headers...]
SGkgR2HDq2wsCgpBY3R1YWxseSB3aGVuIHdvcmtpbmcgd2l0aCBncmFwaHMgSSBwcmVmZXJyZWQg
[Please do not top-post]
* Pau Amaro-Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-07 16:11 +0100]:
> I must be mentally retarded, but I tried that one and it didn't work
> for me... I get always the "To:"... ??? Please corroborate mi IQ
I just noted that I don't know a way to avoid the 'To '. I seem to
ig
I must be mentally retarded, but I tried that one and it didn't work
for me... I get always the "To:"... ??? Please corroborate mi IQ
2007/12/7, Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 Pau Amaro-Seoane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > I have not found the way of modifying the
* On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 Pau Amaro-Seoane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> I have not found the way of modifying the To: thing. It must be
> related to $to_chars, but how? Thanks for your answer
> This is what I have:
>
> set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%4c) %s"
Change %-15.15L into %-15
This is what I have:
set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%4c) %s"
I have not found the way of modifying the To: thing. It must be
related to $to_chars, but how? Thanks for your answer
2007/12/6, Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Pau Amaro-Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-06 1
* Pau Amaro-Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-06 14:15 +0100]:
> and yet I would love to get rid of the "To:" thing... I don't have a
> "From:" in my inbox... it's a word repeated unnecessary as many times
> as email I have sent... I know I have sent them, it's the SENT
> folder...
Redefine $in
and yet I would love to get rid of the "To:" thing... I don't have a
"From:" in my inbox... it's a word repeated unnecessary as many times
as email I have sent... I know I have sent them, it's the SENT
folder...
2007/12/6, Pau Amaro-Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Why did you set default_hook and
> Why did you set default_hook and not simple_search? This is mentioned
> in the mail you are replying to.
>
> Nicolas
>
> --
> http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas
because I am preparing a big move to another country and I didn't look
carefully?
my excuses, my fault
thanks a lot
Pau
[please do not top-post]
* Pau Amaro-Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-06 12:41 +0100]:
> > >I think you mean $simple_search with the default "~f %s | ~s %s".
> >
> > Right! Sorry, my mistake.
>
> In any case, now I have set default_hook="(~f %s !~P) | (~P ~C %s) |
> ~s %s" in my muttrc and stil
I like to understand what
the problem is
2007/12/5, Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday, December 5 at 12:03 AM, quoth Nicolas Rachinsky:
> >* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-04 16:39 -0600]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, December 5 at 12:03 AM, quoth Nicolas Rachinsky:
>* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-04 16:39 -0600]:
>> Searching in any index (sent, inbox, whatever) relies on the value of
>> $default_hook, which d
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-04 16:39 -0600]:
> Searching in any index (sent, inbox, whatever) relies on the value of
> $default_hook, which defaults to "~f %s !~P | (~P ~C %s)".
I think you mean $simple_search with the default "~f %s |
On 2007-12-04, Pau Amaro-Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> / is a wonderful tool to search for keywords in the "inbox" BUT not in
> sent... because mutt adds automatically a "To" in the field, which
> seems to spoil the search:
>
> 24 F Dec 03 To Stas ( 13) tomorrow
> 25
t;
> Is there a way to get rid of that "To" in the 5th column?
Generally speaking, no, there isn't. However, that's not what is
breaking your search (trust me). Mutt does not search the text that is
displayed; it searches the underlying details of the messages.
Searching i
Hi,
/ is a wonderful tool to search for keywords in the "inbox" BUT not in
sent... because mutt adds automatically a "To" in the field, which
seems to spoil the search:
24 F Dec 03 To Stas ( 13) tomorrow
25 F Dec 03 To Guste( 3) Re: nos vamos
26 F Dec 03 To Stas
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002, MindFuq wrote:
> I'm thinking about switching to mutt.
>
> Major deterrant: the crappy search functionality.
>
> When my index is displayed and I press "/" to do a search, it only searches
> the screen. If I want to search message bodies, it seems I have to open each
I'm thinking about switching to mutt.
Major deterrant: the crappy search functionality.
When my index is displayed and I press "/" to do a search, it only searches
the screen. If I want to search message bodies, it seems I have to open each
message and do the search; not practical if I h
has the option for recursion
> though.
>
> When I've used grepm, it works great, and is easier to find matches
> than searching thru the index to find it.
Yes, ist's great. Does anybody knows a mbox full text indexing
and searching package?
Ciao, Gregor
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Thomas Baker wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Adam Byrtek wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 18:56:20 +0100
> > From: Adam Byrtek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: Adam Byrtek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subje
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 07:41:21PM +0100, Thomas Baker wrote:
>On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Adam Byrtek wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 18:56:20 +0100
>> From: Adam Byrtek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Adam Byrtek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Adam Byrtek wrote:
> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 18:56:20 +0100
> From: Adam Byrtek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Adam Byrtek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: searching across mailboxes
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:4
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:43:42AM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> Is there a way in mutt to search across all my local mailboxes for a
> message that is from a specific person and then display the list of
> matches so I can go through and look for the message I want?
You should try grepm at
Is there a way in mutt to search across all my local mailboxes for a
message that is from a specific person and then display the list of
matches so I can go through and look for the message I want?
Thanks.
--
Carl B. Constantine University of Victoria
Programmer Analyst
nfs mounted Maildirs
(all the old stuff is in mbox archives) - Searching all this mail is a
big drag, since mutt can't 'limit' across multiple mailboxes and
grepping through all this junk can take hours.
Michael Elkins' header cache patch is an experiment in speeding up
a
By default the matched line is just glued at the top.
Is there something like a target line for the search function in the
builtin pager? (Something like -j for `less'?)
-Hanspeter
* Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-06 15:04]:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to search for a header, specifically, the Message-ID header,
> but haven't found a way to do that in Mutt yet. Do you know how?
>
> Thanks,
> Carlos.
>
http://mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.2
~h EXPR
Hello,
I'd like to search for a header, specifically, the Message-ID header,
but haven't found a way to do that in Mutt yet. Do you know how?
Thanks,
Carlos.
--
_ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ to hell with icq, use jabber!
(_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK?
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 07:12:32PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> Hi Peter,
Hi Gregor,
> hi mutt users,
[...]
> mutt -f <(grepmail -h cco@ *)
>
> i see mutt reading messages from "/dev/fd/63", a few messages from
> grepmaiol and then:
>
> the mutt index which first looks fine but when I hit
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[29-12-2001 15:01]:
| On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 08:20:30PM -0200, Carlos Laviola wrote:
| > I know I can search thru message bodies, but how do I search thru
| > their headers?
| From the manual:
| 4.2. Patterns
| ...
| ~h EXPR messages which
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
I know I can search thru message bodies, but how do I search thru
their headers?
Thanks,
Carlos.
--
_ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ to hell with icq, use jabber!
(_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK?
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
