* Mike Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-20 15:36]:
>
> Tag all the ones you want saved (with the ";" key), then save them.
To be potentially clearer...
Tag all messages you want to save (move) with "t", then hit ";" to start
the "perform on tagged items" operation. Next, hit "s" to save the
me
Payal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 10 20, 02 at 14:52:
> Hi,
> Great to receive mails from you all.
> > use the s (save) command. this will give you a prompt where you can specify
> got it. works beautifully, but can I do multiple saves at a same time?
Tag all the ones you want saved (with t
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 02:21:55PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [...]
>
> 1. Please tell a plain answer ;-), if I have a files like Mail/inbox,
> Mail/friends. I get maildrop to do filtering. Now if I go to Mail/inbox
> and find that a particular mail should have gone to Mail/friends, how do
Hi all,
I have just started using mutt maily cos' all email clients
sucks and mutt sucks less. I wanted an email client on console and
mutt was one.
For me an email client is an email client and i don't want to spend
hours learning it. It should just send my mails, filter mail
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 02:21:55PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1. Please tell a plain answer ;-), if I have a files like Mail/inbox,
> Mail/friends. I get maildrop to do filtering. Now if I go to Mail/inbox
> and find that a particular mail should have gone to Mail/friends, how do
> i MOVE it
* Jacek Wojaczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-19-02 14:32]:
>
> Well... I'm pretty sure I have more questions, but I can't remember
> all of them now.
>
I'm sure that you would probably find more questions and, perhaps, even
a few answers to your questions if you RTFM.
You might even get some hel
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 09:29:37PM +0200, Jacek Wojaczynski
> wrote:
>
> > 3. In The Bat! I had a filter which colored all replies to
> > my mails. It based on References: header and my unique
> > Message-ID. Possible in mutt?
>
> Dunno. Probably.
Hi Jacek,
* Jacek Wojaczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19. Okt. 2002]:
[...]
> 3. In The Bat! I had a filter which colored all replies to my mails.
> It based on References: header and my unique Message-ID.
> Possible in mutt?
color index default color7 '~h
"^references:[[:blank:]].*pit.id-43118.user
Jacek Wojaczynski wrote:
> 4. Folders - it really sucks! I even cannot see how many read/unread
> messages there are in a particular folder if I don't enter it...
Sounds like you haven't listed your mailboxes in .muttrc:
mailboxes !
mailboxes =mutt =procmail-user =linux-kernel =vim-user
mailboxe
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 23:02:15 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 09:29:37PM +0200, Jacek Wojaczynski wrote:
> > 3. In The Bat! I had a filter which colored all replies to my mails.
> > It based on References: header and my unique Message-ID.
> > Possible in mutt?
>
> Dunno
* Jacek Wojaczynski:
> 3. In The Bat! I had a filter which colored all replies to my mails.
> It based on References: header and my unique Message-ID.
> Possible in mutt?
you can use patterns for 'color index', refer to man muttrc for details
on that.
> 7. C - copies messages to a different fol
* Jacek Wojaczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-19 21:29:37 +0200]:
> "All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less." :-)
>
> I'm new to the list and wanted to say "Hi!" to everybody.
>
Me too. Imagine my consternation when the *first* message I s
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 09:29:37PM +0200, Jacek Wojaczynski wrote:
> Headers to hide:
>
> !X-Mime
> !X-MSMail
> !X-Priority
> !X-Complaints
>
> So I could see all important to me X-headers and hide those stupid
> ones...
>
> Possible in mutt?
Of course, and even better:
ignore *
unignore date
"All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less." :-)
I'm new to the list and wanted to say "Hi!" to everybody.
I'm also new to mutt, vim and even Linux.
Previously I used to handle all my mail under Windows.
The program of my choice was The Bat! - IMHO the best mail client
for Windows. OK. Enou
Volker --
...and then Volker Moell said...
%
% David T-G wrote:
% >
% > .
% >
% > to tag 'em all, hit esc-P for 'em, and then untag?
%
% Great, thanks! I should think more in macros. :-)
No problem :-)
%
% But while trying out this ferature I saw, that I didn't convince mutt to
% seek i
David T-G wrote:
>
> Do you mean a folder of emails that are non-MIME pgp and you want them to
> be seen as PGP messages? Well, what about a muttrc hook line or a macro
> that simply says
>
> .
>
> to tag 'em all, hit esc-P for 'em, and then untag?
Great, thanks! I should think more in macr
On Jan 08, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> ...and then Derek D. Martin said...
> % [SNIP more of my ramblings...]
> %
> % > Try Esc-P when displaying a message.
> %
> % Ok... I was unfamiliar with this option/feature. I guess you could
> % add another gripe: documentation. The old versi
Derek, et al --
...and then Derek D. Martin said...
%
% > >There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message in
% > >quoted text. MUCH more often than not, that's the behavior I want, so
...
% > The easiest way to do this is, of course, to just use reply. ;-)
%
% Well, yes, exc
Volker -
...and then Volker Moell said...
%
% Lars Hecking wrote:
% >
% > Secondly, mutt also supports checking of traditionally signed email
% > (i.e. without conversion).
% >
% > P check-traditional-pgp check for classic pgp
%
...
% single mail I can hit Esc-P, but when searching i
* Samuel Padgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-01-2002 17:39]:
[all context]
| Real UNIX users only compose email with ed, no doubt about it! ;-)
Real UNIX users telnet to the SMTP port ;)
--
René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The very essence of leadership is that you have to ha
On 8-Jan-2002 10:55 Justin R. Miller wrote:
|
| I don't know about you, but I'd like to have a final confirmation of
| whose key I'm encrypting with before I send a message. For my close
| friends, I have a send-hook set up (to encrypt) and that searches for
| their key(s), but never prompts me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Justin R. Miller hath spake thusly:
> Thus spake Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > - pgp userid identification
> > >
> > > Despite the fact that I've composed an e-mail to a person whose
> > > e-mail address match
mike ledoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't buy into the idea that the editor should be the beginning and
> the end of my interaction with the system. I expect a text editor to
> be good at editing text--nothing more, nothing less. To insist that
> the editor should know the difference be
Thus spake Derek D. Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > - pgp userid identification
> >
> > Despite the fact that I've composed an e-mail to a person whose
> > e-mail address matches exactly one of the userid's in my gpg key
> > ring, and despite the fact that gpg will select the correct key
> > ev
* mike ledoux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 09:22:45AM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
>
> > I couldn't _disagree_ with you more. For example, C source code is
> > text to: I bet you'll want your editor to know that it's editing C
> > source code ;)
I'd perhaps disagree that it s
* Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-01-2002 03:36]:
| On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 21:04:10 -0500, mike ledoux wrote:
| > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:27:29AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
| > > Me too. Now, this isn't a problem for me as using the editor (emacs
| > > in my case) to do that is a b
On 7-Jan-2002 19:53 Derek D. Martin wrote:
|
| Mutt sucks much less (for me) today! =8^) I'd still really really
| like to see the pgp key selection stuff cleaned up, and I'd also
Have a look at http://www.woolridge.org/mutt/ for a patch which will
probably address the iss
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 08:59:04PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > > Mike L, if you have tricks for figuring out WHICH mozilla window the
> > > page will pop up in, I'd like to see that.
>
> Yeah, that'd do it, but I'd rather just leave one up and have it use
> the same one all the time. No
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 21:04:10 -0500, mike ledoux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:27:29AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Me too. Now, this isn't a problem for me as using the editor (emacs
> > in my case) to do that is a better solution since I can unstrip the
> > signature (with Ctrl-_ i
crypt as well). This is *very* frustrating.
Yeah, that sucks too. Though I haven't looked at the code much (being
not really a programmer), it strikes me that ought to be something
that's fairly easy to fix. Maybe I'll look at it, if no one else
bothers...
> > Mutt sucks muc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Will Yardley hath spake thusly:
> Derek D. Martin wrote:
> >
> > Mutt sucks much less (for me) today! =8^) I'd still really really
> > like to see the pgp key selection stuff cleaned up, and I&#x
Derek D. Martin wrote:
>
> Mutt sucks much less (for me) today! =8^) I'd still really really
> like to see the pgp key selection stuff cleaned up, and I'd also
> really rather not have to hit P to have a traditional PGP message
> work.
do you use procmail?
i use t
Same as above for this one.
> - clearsigned and/or ascii-armored messages
At least as far as my (very) limited test goes, P does seem to
deal with this acceptably.
> With these problems, IMO mutt does not suck less than other mailers;
> it just sucks differently. If they were f
Derek D. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, that command didn't do much useful for me,
Did you try running it after loading post-mode?
> To turn it OFF, one would stick this in the appropriate place in
> their .emacs file:
>
> '(post-kill-quoted-sig nil)
That line alone does not do
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 14:40:36 -0500, mike ledoux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:40:30PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > Occasionally, you run across a sig that's just damn cool, or otherwise
> > warrants comment. I can find no way to make mutt include the sig in
> > e-mail, temporarily
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Samuel Padgett hath spake thusly:
> Derek D. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hmmm... well, whenever I reply to a message, everything after
> > sigdashes is stripped from the message. It's possible that my editor
> >
Derek D. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm... well, whenever I reply to a message, everything after
> sigdashes is stripped from the message. It's possible that my editor
> is doing this (I use post-mode for emacs), and I'll look into that.
I'm pretty sure that post-mode does this. Yo
* Derek D. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-01-2002 20:59]:
| > text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -force_html %s; needsterminal
| > text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -dump -force_html %s; copiousoutput
| >
| > When I get HTML mail it automatically gets passed through lynx and
| > displayed in Mutt's pager.
Thus spake Volker Moell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Months ago there was a thread how to do this automatically. But at
> that time all tries didn't work; AFAIR there was a conceptual problem
> (endless loops or so, I don't know exactly any more). Well, to read
> one single mail I can hit Esc-P, but
Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> Secondly, mutt also supports checking of traditionally signed email
> (i.e. without conversion).
>
> P check-traditional-pgp check for classic pgp
Months ago there was a thread how to do this automatically. But at that
time all tries didn't work; AFAIR there wa
On Mon, 07 Jan 2002 at 13:40:30 -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> Here's my current list of gripes:
>
> - forwarded messages not included in quoting
>
> There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message in
> quoted text. MUCH more often than not, that's the behavior I want, so
>
Derek D. Martin wrote:
> At some point hitherto, mike ledoux hath spake thusly:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:40:30PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > > There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message
> > > in quoted text. MUCH more often than not, that's the behavior I
> > >
At some point hitherto, mike ledoux hath spake thusly:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 01:40:30PM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> > There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message in
> > quoted text. MUCH more often than not, that's the behavior I want, so
> > that I can comment on wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> >There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message in
> >quoted text. MUCH more often than not, that's the behavior I want, so
> >that I can comment on what the original writer wrote. Maybe a way
> >does exist, since it seems intui
> - clearsigned and/or ascii-armored messages
>
> Whether you guys like it or not, most of the rest of the world uses
> clearsigning and ascii-armored plaintext messages. Mutt falls down
> here. You apparently refuse to support this, which makes no sense
> since the majority of the PGP-using
Thus spake Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> that said, it would be cool if there were 'forward_inline' and
> 'forward_quoted' options or something.
See $forward_quote :-)
--
Justin R. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
View my website at http://codesorcery.net
Please encrypt email using key 0xC9C40
Derek D. Martin wrote:
> There seems to be no way to make mutt include a forwarded message in
> quoted text.
why not just reply and then change the 'To' header.
you can delete the 'in-reply-to' if you're worried about messing up
headers.
that said, it would be cool if there were 'forward_inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I like Mutt's motto: All e-mail clients suck; mutt just sucks less.
And I used to believe it too, until I started trying to use GPG
regularly. I switched from Pine to mutt specifically for its built-in
support for PGP/GPG. But I found that either I
48 matches
Mail list logo
