I've been castigated a couple of times for using the gbnet
address for sending mail to mutt-users, and it confused me, because I
thought I had changed that definition in my configs; I just noticed
that the problem might be that mutt-users-digest (which I receive)
sets the reply-to t
Deon --
First, please do not include the whole digest in your posting; that was
over a thousand lines of nothing as far as I could tell. In fact, It
doesn't even seem to have been a related question but an entirely new
one!
Second, you should know that the mutt-users address is @mutt.org instea
73 195-0299
- Original Message -
From: "mutt-users-digest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 2:46 AM
Subject: mutt-users-digest V1 #954
>
> mutt-users-digest Saturday, January 12 2002 Volume 01 : Numbe
-digest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020102 16:19]:
% >
% > mutt-users-digest Saturday, December 29 2001 Volume 01 : Number 909
Third, this was really painful -- and you didn't, AFAICT, even include
any text of your own. Thank heavens for pipes so that I could pretty
easily see tha
* mutt-users-digest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020102 16:19]:
>
> mutt-users-digest Saturday, December 29 2001 Volume 01 : Number 909
>
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> Re: big mailbox v.s. rotated mailbox; thoughts
> Re: Moving between folders
>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001, MuttER wrote:
> yeeesss, BUT I AM able to post to other addresses correctly as I am
> now setup. I ONLY (iirc) have a problem with AOL, which is known to to
> rather odd things :^).
I am sorry, I missed the fact that you cannot send your mails to AOL
only. Then, there
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 03:40:46PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2001 23:01:34 -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> > > I get this failure/error when posting from mutt 1.3.23i. I
> > > DO NOT get a failure when I copy the same msg to kmail's outbox
> > > and then send it (exactly the sam
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001 23:01:34 -0600, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> > I get this failure/error when posting from mutt 1.3.23i. I
> > DO NOT get a failure when I copy the same msg to kmail's outbox
> > and then send it (exactly the same msg). ?
> In that case, I don't have a clue. Sorry :(
In that
I left out one crucial constraint: I'm reading the mutt-users digest
via IMAP, so it never gets locally delivered by procmail. I wrote a
little perl script that runs formail while "preserving" some of the
headers in the digest (like "sender"). But that's an ugly
ng to the subject, like "[wm-users] Original subject
> here".
>
> How do you handle this when using formail to split the mutt-users
> digest?
The trick is to run formail from your .procmailrc. I'll post the
example from the procmailex manpage:
:0:
* ^Subject:.*surfin
mutt-users. Other list's digests typically do one of two things:
* Include other headers in the individual messages, such as "To" or
"Cc", or
* Prepend something to the subject, like "[wm-users] Original subject
here".
How do you handle this when using formail
* Duke Normandin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010228 22:19]:
> I'm currently subscribed to various mailing lists that include the
> messages as "attachments" -- so it's trivial to reply to an single
> message/thread. However, the mutt-users-digest "includes"
Hi...
I'm currently subscribed to various mailing lists that include the
messages as "attachments" -- so it's trivial to reply to an single
message/thread. However, the mutt-users-digest "includes" all the
messages into one message. How do you guys get around this
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:46:34AM -0700, Duke Normandin wrote:
>The digest for this list "includes" the messages to one file. Is there a
>way to "burst" them into individual messages for reading? Tia...
formail(1) perhaps?
--
Oo---o, Oo---o, O-weem-oh-wum-oo
Duke Normandin proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> The digest for this list "includes" the messages to one file. Is there a
> way to "burst" them into individual messages for reading? Tia...
man procmailex (and formail)
-s
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
malle
Hi..
The digest for this list "includes" the messages to one file. Is there a
way to "burst" them into individual messages for reading? Tia...
--
-duke
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Quoting ?iso-8859-1?Q?Mikko_H=E4nninen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --
>
> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:44:46 +0300
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mikko_H=E4nninen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: sending mail
>
> Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 27 Sep 20
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> John P. Looney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 15 Nov 1999:
> > I'm using 1.1.1 and 1.0, and both are giving me the same problems.
>
> I had to read your message twice before I noticed the error in the
> Subject line. I think I read somewhere some sort of hints f
Hi!
Why the mutt-users-digest mailing list is in plain
text, not in mime digest?
Mutt works very fine with mime digest messages. It is
easily to reply to a single message of the digest if
it is in mime.
TIA.
--
___
Daniel González Gasull
> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 09:42:11 +
> From: Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: IMAP folders, some further thoughts/questions
> Since an IMAP folder can (in some implementations at least) both
> contain other folders and messages does this mean that it can't be
> directly implemented a
20 matches
Mail list logo
