Re: mice in mutt

2001-11-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 19:04:20 -0500, Paul Ackersviller wrote: > I agree it wouldn't be anywhere near as useful as in other programs, > but I would find it handy to point at a message to choose in the index. > I find typing in a specific number to be cumbersome in a mailbox with > hundreds or th

Re: mice in mutt

2001-11-09 Thread Paul Ackersviller
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 06:14:42PM -0500, Daniel Eisenbud wrote: > > Mutt used to be mouse-aware. > > That was a very very long time ago. I forget why ME took it out. It > was never very useful anyway. I agree it wouldn't be anywhere near as useful as in other programs, but I would find it ha

Re: mice in mutt

2001-11-09 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:10:11PM -0500, Paul Ackersviller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 06:26:20AM -0500, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > > > > eterm implements some of the xterm mouse stuff (same as rxvt and aterm). > > > > It's possible that konsole (KDE) does also, but the

Re: mice in mutt

2001-11-09 Thread David T-G
Paul -- ...and then Paul Ackersviller said... % On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 06:26:20AM -0500, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: % > % > eterm implements some of the xterm mouse stuff (same as rxvt and aterm). ... % % There aren't any mouse operations that are documented for mutt though. % Is there a patch fl

Re: mice in mutt

2001-11-09 Thread Paul Ackersviller
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 06:26:20AM -0500, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > > eterm implements some of the xterm mouse stuff (same as rxvt and aterm). > > It's possible that konsole (KDE) does also, but they don't bother > documenting what it does (I noticed for instance that konsole recognizes > one of

Re: mice in mutt

2001-11-09 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Paul Ackersviller wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 10:03:08PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > > I'll accept that. I'd call it the GUI version of mutt :-) While I see > > that as a logical evolution, I don't see it happening; mutt runs happily > > in a GUI (as you point out) termin

Re: mice in mutt

2001-11-08 Thread Paul Ackersviller
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 10:03:08PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > I'll accept that. I'd call it the GUI version of mutt :-) While I see > that as a logical evolution, I don't see it happening; mutt runs happily > in a GUI (as you point out) terminal and can be made to call GUI helper > applications (