On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 10:03:08PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > I'll accept that. I'd call it the GUI version of mutt :-) While I see > that as a logical evolution, I don't see it happening; mutt runs happily > in a GUI (as you point out) terminal and can be made to call GUI helper > applications (like image and web programs), and with eterm (IIUC) can > even be made mouse aware. All of the work is done, with no extra bloat > in the mutt code :-)
Please enlighten me about making mutt mouse-aware, I wasn't aware that's possible. Why would it require eterm, couldn't it be done in an xterm like with vim and lynx? -- Paul Ackersviller
