On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 09:17:48AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-06-12 15:46:03 +1000, CaT wrote:
>
> > Which version of mutt should I try to see if I can
> > reporduce this? I've noticed there have been
> > official-looking patches about and wanna see if I can
> > get this to happen ag
On 2000-06-12 15:46:03 +1000, CaT wrote:
> Which version of mutt should I try to see if I can
> reporduce this? I've noticed there have been
> official-looking patches about and wanna see if I can
> get this to happen again.
I think we have already been reproducing what you
describe, and there a
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 11:53:51PM +1000, CaT wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 11:43:22AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > On 2000-06-05 10:29:16 +1000, CaT wrote:
> >
> > > Before attempt:
> >
> > > -%-Mutt: /tmp/damien.work [Msgs:5492 New:12 Old:1176 Post:1 36M]---(reverse-
> >
> > > After a
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 08:18:56PM +0200, clemensF wrote:
> > CaT:
>
> > Local filesystem for all mailboxes. and erm.. disjunct?
>
> sorry, i could not find the word and threw in what came up. i mean, can
> you guarante that no links, chrooted environments or whatever make
> different mailboxes
> CaT:
> Local filesystem for all mailboxes. and erm.. disjunct?
sorry, i could not find the word and threw in what came up. i mean, can
you guarante that no links, chrooted environments or whatever make
different mailboxes undifferent, i.e. the same file?
--
clemens
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 11:43:22AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-06-05 10:29:16 +1000, CaT wrote:
>
> > Before attempt:
>
> > -%-Mutt: /tmp/damien.work [Msgs:5492 New:12 Old:1176 Post:1 36M]---(reverse-
>
> > After attempt:
>
> > ---Mutt: /var/spool/mail/damien.work [Msgs:5038 New:9
On 2000-06-05 10:29:16 +1000, CaT wrote:
> Before attempt:
> -%-Mutt: /tmp/damien.work [Msgs:5492 New:12 Old:1176 Post:1 36M]---(reverse-
> After attempt:
> ---Mutt: /var/spool/mail/damien.work [Msgs:5038 New:9 Old:1074 Post:1 34M]--
What precisely did happen between these two versions of
the
Hi CaT!
On Mon, 05 Jun 2000, CaT wrote:
> I had both /tmp and /var/spool/mail filled up. I selected two msgs for
> deletion as well as read one document. It would not let me quit. I
> trie dit multiple times. I freed up space on /var/spool/mail so that it
> has 160meg free and it still would no
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 07:29:53PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 04 Jun 2000:
> > Ok.. NOW I'm using 1.2. Grr. Compiled 1.2, went to play
> > with my bros on their nintendo, came back and forgot I
> > didn't install :)
>
> And the result of trying to re-crea
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 09:52:48PM +0200, clemensF wrote:
> > CaT:
>
> > I'm using several mutts but they're all on a different mailbox.
>
> mailboxes accessed by some nfs? really every mailbox disjunct?
Local filesystem for all mailboxes. and erm.. disjunct?
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> CaT:
> I'm using several mutts but they're all on a different mailbox.
mailboxes accessed by some nfs? really every mailbox disjunct?
--
clemens
CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 04 Jun 2000:
> Ok.. NOW I'm using 1.2. Grr. Compiled 1.2, went to play
> with my bros on their nintendo, came back and forgot I
> didn't install :)
And the result of trying to re-create the problem with 1.2 is ..?
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu //
On 2000-06-04 20:44:26 +1000, CaT wrote:
> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
hmmm...
> Well if you check my X-Mailer header now... :)
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:08:57AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-06-04 16:32:44 +1000, CaT wrote:
>
> > for example this is one message in the mailbox that is
> > currupt. Not that it consists of virtually missing
> > headers and that it is two messages concatenated into
> > one. And ev
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:08:57AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-06-04 16:32:44 +1000, CaT wrote:
>
> > for example this is one message in the mailbox that is
> > currupt. Not that it consists of virtually missing
> > headers and that it is two messages concatenated into
> > one. And ev
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:19:46AM +0200, clemensF wrote:
> are you using several mutt windows in a gui or mbox formatted mailboxes
> without locked access?
I'm using several mutts but they're all on a different mailbox.
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) URL: http://www.zip.com.a
> Thomas Roessler:
> than maildir for large mailboxes. Just imagine a rather
> traditional Unix file system design having to deal with
> 7k5 files in _one_ directory...
this might trouble the traditional linux (linear search) fs.
--
clemens
On 2000-06-03 23:42:17 -0700, Anton Graham wrote:
> I would guess that your problem stems, in part, from
> the fact that the mbox format is not really designed
> for a 47 meg box with 7500+ messages.
Personally, I have mbox folders with several 1e5 messages,
and have not experienced any proble
On 2000-06-04 16:32:44 +1000, CaT wrote:
> for example this is one message in the mailbox that is
> currupt. Not that it consists of virtually missing
> headers and that it is two messages concatenated into
> one. And even then the message bodies are incomplete
> and the body of the first message
are you using several mutt windows in a gui or mbox formatted mailboxes
without locked access?
--
clemens
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 12:38:35PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> CaT proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> >Ok. Not to be faceatous(sp?) or anything... just being curious :) What
> >will this prove/solve/whatnot? I may have missed out on a bit of info
> >in that, from memory, if I clear /t
Anton Graham proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>I would guess that your problem stems, in part, from the fact that the
>mbox format is not really designed for a 47 meg box with 7500+
>messages. I would seriously consider saving some of those messages in
So which is the best one? Here at the Juno
On Sun, 04 Jun 2000, CaT wrote:
> I don't suppose I have a hope in getting any sort of responce to this?
>
> It is kinda important and I'd be more then happy to help track down the
> problem but at the moment I've gotten SFA responce to it which may mean
> that noone really cares if mutt corrupt
CaT proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>Ok. Not to be faceatous(sp?) or anything... just being curious :) What
>will this prove/solve/whatnot? I may have missed out on a bit of info
>in that, from memory, if I clear /tmp then it eventually safes (albeit
>in an icky corrupted manner).
>
>Anyways, jus
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 12:13:38PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> CaT proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> >Mutt does corrupt if it cannot recover from this situation without
> >corrupting the mailbox. It's not that the mailbox is saved, intact
>
> It should _not_ find itself in such a s
CaT proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>Mutt does corrupt if it cannot recover from this situation without
>corrupting the mailbox. It's not that the mailbox is saved, intact
It should _not_ find itself in such a situation. Tell you what - move
your mailboxes to another partition and create symli
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:49:40AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> CaT proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> >I don't suppose I have a hope in getting any sort of responce to this?
>
> Let me see ..
>
> >It is kinda important and I'd be more then happy to help track down the
> >problem but
CaT proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>I don't suppose I have a hope in getting any sort of responce to this?
Let me see ..
>It is kinda important and I'd be more then happy to help track down the
>problem but at the moment I've gotten SFA responce to it which may mean
>that noone really cares if
I don't suppose I have a hope in getting any sort of responce to this?
It is kinda important and I'd be more then happy to help track down the
problem but at the moment I've gotten SFA responce to it which may mean
that noone really cares if mutt corrupts mailboxes.
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 09:23
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 10:10:07AM +1000, CaT wrote:
> well I just had my mailbox corrupted for the second time by mutt 8(
>
> this happens when I try to quit, mutt finds there's not enough room
> in /tmp and so doesn't let me. What winds up happening is that once
> I do get a chance to quit prop
well I just had my mailbox corrupted for the second time by mutt 8(
this happens when I try to quit, mutt finds there's not enough room
in /tmp and so doesn't let me. What winds up happening is that once
I do get a chance to quit properly (as opposed to exit) mutt saves
the mailbox with a large c
31 matches
Mail list logo
