A small update on the matter. John was kind enough the send me a
encrypted test email from the iphone app and it worked
perfectly. I could verify signatures and and decrypt it properly from
within mutt automatically without any trouble.
With this in mind I just realized that my friend for weird
Hello! I'm having some trouble decrypting emails from a friend who is
using some kind of Iphone app for PGP.
When I get a encrypted email from this person it usually looks like this:
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 13:06:17 +0100
From: frend
To: me
Subject: something
[-- Attachment #1 --]
[-- Type: text/
Rocco, et al --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hi!
%
% * David T-G [2002-06-06 00:22:02 CEST] wrote:
%
% > I had the same problem recently and we traced it to the
...
%
% Wow, just to be curious, your solution is?
To not declare my default keyring in my list of keyrings, since gp
Hi,
* David T-G [2002-06-06 00:22:02 CEST] wrote:
> I had the same problem recently and we traced it to the
> gpg exit code. It turns out that I had a bogus entry in
> my options file that caused gpg to not fail but not exit
> cleanly, and mutt noticed that.
Wow, just to be curious, your solut
Peter --
...and then David T-G said...
%
...
% I had the same problem recently and we traced it to the gpg exit code.
Forgot to mention that most of it was on-list and therefore is in the
archives. Might be helpful.
HTH & HAND
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight fo
Peter, et al --
...and then Peter T. Abplanalp said...
%
% i have mutt set up with gpg. when verifying a message, gpg gives the
% following output:
%
% [-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Jun 5 13:45:19 2002) --]
% gpg: Signature made Wed Jun 5 13:24:25 2002 MDT using DSA key ID
...
%
Hi,
* Peter T. Abplanalp [2002-06-05 21:50:46 CEST] wrote:
> i have mutt set up with gpg. when verifying a message,
> gpg gives the following output:
[...]
> however, mutt then says "PGP signature could NOT be
> verified." is that because of the warning that the key in
> not certified with a tr
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 01:50:46PM -0600, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> i have mutt set up with gpg. when verifying a message, gpg gives the
> following output:
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Jun 5 13:45:19 2002) --]
> gpg: Signature made Wed Jun 5 13:24:25 2002 MDT using DSA key ID
i have mutt set up with gpg. when verifying a message, gpg gives the
following output:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Jun 5 13:45:19 2002) --]
gpg: Signature made Wed Jun 5 13:24:25 2002 MDT using DSA key ID
D654075A
gpg: Good signature from "Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg:
On Fri 19-Oct-2001 at 07:58:24AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
>
> Is anyone using mutt/gpg to change records at Network Solutions using
> pgp? I seem unable to send a change to them which their software will
> accept. Their error message is less than lucid.
If it's anything like the nic.uk robo
> Old-style PGP isn't cleanly specified, and has problems with
> non-us-ascii character sets. It kind of works when you are doing
> text-e-mail in English, but that's all.
>
> PGP/MIME doesn't have this problem, and is cleanly specified (RFC
> 3156).
I'm reading the RFC now. Thanks for the r
On 2001-09-04 16:22:33 -0500, Ben Jones wrote:
>When you say "strongly deprecated" do you mean by Mutt's standards
>or by an official standard. If the latter, would you mind pointing
>me to a reference for my reading enjoyment? Not that I'm
>challenging you, because I'm not. I'd just like to l
This is my first post to this list so I would be out of line to not
start by saying that Mutt is by far the best mail client I've ever
used. Ok, now on to business.
> Use Inline Signatures:
> set pgp_create_traditional=yes
>
> But note:
> [snip]
> Also note that using the old-style PGP messa
Andre, et al --
...and then Andre Bonhote said...
% Hi fellows
Hello!
%
% Sorry about asking that (again?), but I didn't find a solution to this
% problem searching the web.
You should have searched the archives ;-) Almost a year ago in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Shane Wegner posted his patch to e
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:17:55AM +0200, Christoph Maurer wrote:
> The Problem is not PGP, but Outlook.
Ah? New to me ;)
> I defined two macros in my muttrc, so I can encrypt and sign
> messages in a way MS Outlook (and a lot of other Windows Email
> Clients) understand:
That's what I did to
Am Mon, 03 Sep 2001, schrieb Andre Bonhote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 12:44:33PM +0200, Volker Moell wrote:
> > Two Words: outlook! :-(
>
> You missed one word: sucks!
>
> > Use Inline Signatures:
> > set pgp_create_traditional=yes
>
> Does not work.
>
> > Note that PGP/MIME w
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 12:44:33PM +0200, Volker Moell wrote:
> Two Words: outlook! :-(
You missed one word: sucks!
> Use Inline Signatures:
> set pgp_create_traditional=yes
Does not work.
> Note that PGP/MIME will be used automatically for messages which have
> a character set d
Andre Bonhote wrote:
>
> I just installed GPG 1.0.6 on my linux box and configured mutt to work
> with it. Fine so far. Next, I set up a test win2k box with Outlook
> Express, PGP 6.5.8 and later with 7.0.3. Now, after exchanging keys
> (which are different, for testing purpose), I first tried to
Hi fellows
Sorry about asking that (again?), but I didn't find a solution to this
problem searching the web.
I just installed GPG 1.0.6 on my linux box and configured mutt to work
with it. Fine so far. Next, I set up a test win2k box with Outlook
Express, PGP 6.5.8 and later with 7.0.3. Now, aft
Nils --
FYI, the proper posting address for mutt-users is *NOT* at gbnet, even
though the list is hosted there and the address leaks through sometimes.
...and then Nils Vogels said...
% Hi there!
%
% I have been trying to make gpg dump its keys it fetches while being in mutt in
...
...and then
OK, attempt nr 2.. my previous one didn't get answered at all .. does anyone
have an idea how to get started on mutt + gpg + seperate keyfiles ?
Grtz,
Nils
Hi there!
I have been trying to make gpg dump its keys it fetches while being in mutt in
a seperate file. To make this happen, I set the
Hi, all --
...and then Nils Vogels said...
%
% set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --recv-keys --keyring pubkey.import.gpg %r"
%
% only, for some reason, gpg sends out the error, reporting that the email
% adress where the mail comes from is not a valid key-id. IMHO this error is
% quite correct, sinc
Hi there!
I have been trying to make gpg dump its keys it fetches while being in mutt in
a seperate file. To make this happen, I set the following variable in my rc:
set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --recv-keys --keyring pubkey.import.gpg %r"
only, for some reason, gpg sends out the error, reportin
Hi all,
Does anyone know of a way to get mutt to encrypt mail
to a specific address using _several_ distinct public
keys?
I want to be able to achieve the same effect as you
would expect the following to do:
pgp-hook pattern keyid1 keyid2 keyid3 ...
However, this unfortunately does not
24 matches
Mail list logo
