On 09:41 13 Feb 2002, Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Daniel Farnsworth Teichert wrote:
| > I imagine this has already been thought of, but one option would be to simply
| > let the mono attribute work on top of the color one. Then the desired behavior
| > from this original posting co
Daniel Farnsworth Teichert wrote:
> I imagine this has already been thought of, but one option would be to simply
> let the mono attribute work on top of the color one. Then the desired behavior
> from this original posting could be to set the mono to none, and not specify
> the color attribute, o
And I heard Mike Schiraldi exclaim:
> just the background, but that sounds like a pretty good idea. We're working
> on redesigning mutt's color system, but it's rather difficult to come up
> with something that's simple in syntax yet powerful enough to do what you
> requested. Plus (hopefully) bac
> Is it possible to set the indicator foreground color to none?
> I mark new, old mails with colors and so i don't want to let the
> indicator change it.
The latest CVS version of mutt makes the default indicator (i.e. "mono
indicator reverse") simply the reverse of whatever color the message wou
On Feb 13, Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Feb 13, Marc Bruenink [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > Is it possible to set the indicator foreground color to none?
> > I mark new, old mails with colors and so i don't want to let the
> > indicator change it.
>
> Currently there isn't, but
On Feb 13, Marc Bruenink [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Is it possible to set the indicator foreground color to none?
> I mark new, old mails with colors and so i don't want to let the
> indicator change it.
Currently there isn't, but Mike Schiraldi has a patch which is also in the
CVS version that
hi freaks.
Is it possible to set the indicator foreground color to none?
I mark new, old mails with colors and so i don't want to let the
indicator change it.
TIA
marc(..)
