Daniel Farnsworth Teichert wrote: > I imagine this has already been thought of, but one option would be to simply > let the mono attribute work on top of the color one. Then the desired behavior > from this original posting could be to set the mono to none, and not specify > the color attribute, of the indicator--which would be understood by mutt to > mean 'leave the colors alone, but apply the color attribute "none" on top of > that'.
I had the same thought at first, but I figure in the end this might cause more confusion than its worth. I worry we will get people complaining that they can't use different attributes for mono vs. color. Also, the way its implemented currently thsi would be difficult. If you have a color term, the mono commands are basically ignored because there is only one table for attributes.
