Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet - nntp patch vs BCC?

2002-03-25 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 12:09:40:PM -0500 Andre Berger wrote: > * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-22 20:31 -0500: > > well, does this BCC header get posted, too? > > if not then I don't a problem.. *shrug* > Indirectly: > To: undisclosed recipients ; > is generated, but no mail is

Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet - nntp patch vs BCC?

2002-03-24 Thread Andre Berger
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-22 20:31 -0500: > * Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-18 15:51]: > > > Can't you BCC all messages to one address, and filter with procmail? > > that's what I'm doing :) The problem is, when I > > post news (nntp-patch), I don't want a Bcc header.

Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet - nntp patch vs BCC?

2002-03-22 Thread Sven Guckes
* Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-18 15:51]: > > Can't you BCC all messages to one address, and filter with procmail? > that's what I'm doing :) The problem is, when I > post news (nntp-patch), I don't want a Bcc header. well, does this BCC header get posted, too? if not then I don't a

Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet

2002-03-18 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-18 10:50:49 -0500]: > that's what I'm doing :) The problem is, when I post news > (nntp-patch), I don't want a Bcc header. Uh, sorry, I didn't follow the thread closely, it seems I missed the real problem. Nicolas

Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet

2002-03-18 Thread Andre Berger
* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-18 10:17 -0500: > * Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-17 21:50:28 -0500]: > > I'm working on different computers at work and want to save my mail > > on none of them. Bcc is a convenient mail to keep track of all my > > mail in one place, my

Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet

2002-03-18 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-17 21:50:28 -0500]: > I'm working on different computers at work and want to save my mail > on none of them. Bcc is a convenient mail to keep track of all my > mail in one place, my compi at home. Where I use fcc-hooks BTW. Can't you BCC all messages to

Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet

2002-03-17 Thread Andre Berger
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-17 18:26 -0500: > * Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-17 02:05]: [...] > If you just want mutt to keep > a copy of all your messages > depending on Email or Usenet > then why not set FCC instead? > > Why *send* a copy? [...] > fcc-hook'~t .

Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet

2002-03-17 Thread Sven Guckes
* Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-17 02:05]: > What I'm trying to accomplish is more or less the same Jerome (the > original poster) wants. We use mutt with nntp-patch and want to set > headers according to the fact if we are mailing or posting. i got that. however, you did not descri