Hi,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 12:09:40:PM -0500 Andre Berger wrote:
> * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-22 20:31 -0500:
> > well, does this BCC header get posted, too?
> > if not then I don't a problem.. *shrug*
> Indirectly:
> To: undisclosed recipients ;
> is generated, but no mail is
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-22 20:31 -0500:
> * Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-18 15:51]:
> > > Can't you BCC all messages to one address, and filter with procmail?
> > that's what I'm doing :) The problem is, when I
> > post news (nntp-patch), I don't want a Bcc header.
* Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-18 15:51]:
> > Can't you BCC all messages to one address, and filter with procmail?
> that's what I'm doing :) The problem is, when I
> post news (nntp-patch), I don't want a Bcc header.
well, does this BCC header get posted, too?
if not then I don't a
* Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-18 10:50:49 -0500]:
> that's what I'm doing :) The problem is, when I post news
> (nntp-patch), I don't want a Bcc header.
Uh, sorry, I didn't follow the thread closely, it seems I missed the
real problem.
Nicolas
* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-18 10:17 -0500:
> * Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-17 21:50:28 -0500]:
> > I'm working on different computers at work and want to save my mail
> > on none of them. Bcc is a convenient mail to keep track of all my
> > mail in one place, my
* Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-17 21:50:28 -0500]:
> I'm working on different computers at work and want to save my mail
> on none of them. Bcc is a convenient mail to keep track of all my
> mail in one place, my compi at home. Where I use fcc-hooks BTW.
Can't you BCC all messages to
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-03-17 18:26 -0500:
> * Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-17 02:05]:
[...]
> If you just want mutt to keep
> a copy of all your messages
> depending on Email or Usenet
> then why not set FCC instead?
>
> Why *send* a copy?
[...]
> fcc-hook'~t .
* Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-17 02:05]:
> What I'm trying to accomplish is more or less the same Jerome (the
> original poster) wants. We use mutt with nntp-patch and want to set
> headers according to the fact if we are mailing or posting.
i got that. however, you did not descri